Taking Rush Limbaugh’s “Operation Chaos” To a New Level

 Amusing  Comments Off on Taking Rush Limbaugh’s “Operation Chaos” To a New Level
Mar 282008
 

In case you haven’t heard by now, Rush Limbaugh has launched a Para-military style public campaign in an effort to affect the outcome of the Democratic Party primary.

Rush has urged his listeners to legally switch party affiliations to participate in “Operation Chaos”, designed to get his listeners to vote for Hillary Clinton which serves two purposes. First, it keeps Hillary Clinton in the race or winning in future primaries and second keeps the Democratic Party involved in what can only be described as political chaos.

Well Bruce Walker has raised an interesting question in his latest article that, if it ever happened, would cause total chaos and possibly destroy the party whose symbol is a Jackass.

Why Don’t We All Become Democrats


Rush Limbaugh’s “Operation Chaos” raises an interesting question. The Left has occupied the Democrat Party, which has purchased the souls of large groups of Americans – blacks, Hispanics, feminists – and yet the word “liberal” is passionately rejected by all Democrats. The political parties have been democratized completely: no one can keep anyone from participating completely in the Republican or Democrat parties.

This raises an interesting theoretical question: Why don’t we all simply become Democrats? The Left has smeared the Republican Party with racism so much that any Republican candidate automatically starts with ten percent of the popular vote against him. Add to the black vote a significant share of the Hispanic and Asian vote, which also has been indoctrinated into believing that Republicans are evil, and the natural electoral advantage of just have “Democrat” in front of your name is worth anywhere from fifteen percent to twenty percent of the national vote. It is amazing that Republicans ever win.

If all Republicans became Democrats, then the stigma of being a “Republican” would go away. That would mean that the electoral battles would become primary battles – and not just in the presidential race. Senators, governors, congressmen and state legislators are chosen by primaries. If the whole American electorate were within a single political party, then primaries would be extremely competitive.

The problem for current Democrats in this situation is that Americans overwhelmingly consider themselves to be conservatives, not liberals. This is why no Democrat, even Obama, calls himself a “liberal.” That would mean that conservatives, as Democrats, could advocate conservative policies without fear. No Democrat is going to say “I am a liberal Democrat and my primary opponent is a conservative Democrat” – at least not in the vast majority of the states.

Conservative Democrats who were also religious could have an enormous edge in winning the black and Hispanic vote in Democrat primaries as well. So, two constituencies which have traditionally been alienated from Republicans and conservatives could find common cause with both if the Republicans became, magically, Democrats and if the social conservative principles of these two strongly religious minorities were joined with the conservative “Democrat” candidate.

Moreover, there conservative “Democrats” could run well against snooty white elites like Clinton, Kerry, Kennedy and Dean, who have nothing in common with ordinary Americans except the fact that they are Democrats, and so are presumed to be the friend of the working man or woman. Imagine, for example, how a charismatic conservative like Michael Steele or J.C. Watts could do if running as Democrats against elitist Leftists like Clinton or Kerry.

These sorts of Democrats have proven enormously popular. Zell Miller, for example, is probably the most popular politician in Georgia. Joe Lieberman, although not exactly a conservative, was nevertheless able to win re-election as an “independent Democrat” even after he lost the Democrat primary.

The whole nature of Congress would change as well. If the Democrat caucuses had conservative majorities, then all the leadership positions would be held by conservatives as well. The committee chairmen, the Speakership and all the other coveted positions would be held by conservatives, albeit Democrats. The same would be true for the national party organization. The DNC would start espousing conservative principles. The battles over ideology and policies would all be fought within the Democrat Party and there would be no “Republicans” to blame at all in those battles. What would Leftists do? How could they fight a real battle on policies, when so few people agree with their policies?

Another consequence would be that the rump Republican Party would survive, and that anytime the Left took over the Democrat Party for one election cycle, the Republican Party could have a miraculous rebirth and all the conservative Democrats could switch and vote Republican.

Republicans are a scapegoat for the failures of Democrat policies; they have been for many decades. Perhaps the best way to defang this toxin in politics is for the good guys to take over the Democrat Party and leave the Democrats with the Green Party or the Liberal Party or the Communist Party as their vehicle for political expression. As Operation Chaos succeeds, it is something worth thinking about.


Joke Of The Day

 Jokes  Comments Off on Joke Of The Day
Mar 102008
 

Barack Obama is out jogging one morning, notices a little boy on the corner with a box. Curious, he runs over to the child and says, “What’s in the box, kid?” The little boy says, “Kittens, they’re brand new kittens.” Barack Obama laughs and says, “What kind of kittens are they?” “Democrats,” the child says. “Oh, that’s cute,” Barack Obama says and he runs off. A couple of days later, Barack Obama is running with his buddy Ted Kennedy and he spies the same boy with his box just ahead. Barack says to Ted, “You got to check this out,” and they both jog over to the boy with the box. Barack says, “Look in the box Ted, isn’t that cute? Look at those little kittens. Hey, kid, tell my friend Ted what kind of kittens they are.” The boy replies, “They’re Republicans.”

“Whoa!” Barack says, “I came by here the other day and you said they were Democrats. What’s up?” “Well,” the kid says, “Their eyes are open now.”

America: A Time for Choosing

 Amusing  Comments Off on America: A Time for Choosing
Feb 212008
 

Just words…. that you will never hear Barack Obama or Hillary Clinton utter.

This speech by Ronald Reagan is a must read for all Americans. I do not think Barack Obama or Hillary Clinton will be “stealing” any of these lines and ideas for their speeches. Their vision for America more closely resembles those tested in Italy and Germany from 1933 to 1945.

Read the following wisdom spoken by Ronald Reagan. Let this be our path: one that endorses God-given liberties and the opportunities for freedom laid down in our Constitution.

I, for one, do not want the Democrat Party’s vision of a coercive, state-imposed dependency with it’s deceptive promises of “prosperity” under a form of fascist socialism.

As Reagan says, study the issues and make your choice.

A Time for Choosing

I am going to talk of controversial things. I make no apology for this.

It’s time we asked ourselves if we still know the freedoms intended for us by the Founding Fathers. James Madison said, “We base all our experiments on the capacity of mankind for self government.”

This idea—that government was beholden to the people, that it had no other source of power—is still the newest, most unique idea in all the long history of man’s relation to man. This is the issue of this election: Whether we believe in our capacity for self-government or whether we abandon the American Revolution and confess that a little intellectual elite in a far-distant capital can plan our lives for us better than we can plan them ourselves.

You and I are told we must choose between a left or right, but I suggest there is no such thing as a left or right. There is only an up or down. Up to man’s age-old dream–the maximum of individual freedom consistent with order—or down to the ant heap of totalitarianism. Regardless of their sincerity, their humanitarian motives, those who would sacrifice freedom for security have embarked on this downward path. Plutarch warned, “The real destroyer of the liberties of the people is he who spreads among them bounties, donations and benefits.”

The Founding Fathers knew a government can’t control the economy without controlling people. And they knew when a government sets out to do that, it must use force and coercion to achieve its purpose. So we have come to a time for choosing.

Public servants say, always with the best of intentions, “What greater service we could render if only we had a little more money and a little more power.” But the truth is that outside of its legitimate function, government does nothing as well or as economically as the private sector.

Yet any time you and I question the schemes of the do-gooders, we’re denounced as being opposed to their humanitarian goals. It seems impossible to legitimately debate their solutions with the assumption that all of us share the desire to help the less fortunate. They tell us we’re always “against,” never “for” anything.

We are for a provision that destitution should not follow unemployment by reason of old age, and to that end we have accepted Social Security as a step toward meeting the problem. However, we are against those entrusted with this program when they practice deception regarding its fiscal shortcomings, when they charge that any criticism of the program means that we want to end payments….

We are for aiding our allies by sharing our material blessings with nations which share our fundamental beliefs, but we are against doling out money government to government, creating bureaucracy, if not socialism, all over the world.

We need true tax reform that will at least make a start toward restoring for our children the American Dream that wealth is denied to no one, that each individual has the right to fly as high as his strength and ability will take him…. But we cannot have such reform while our tax policy is engineered by people who view the tax as a means of achieving changes in our social structure….

Have we the courage and the will to face up to the immorality and discrimination of the progressive tax, and demand a return to traditional proportionate taxation? . . . Today in our country the tax collector’s share is 37 cents of every dollar earned. Freedom has never been so fragile, so close to slipping from our grasp.

Are you willing to spend time studying the issues, making yourself aware, and then conveying that information to family and friends? Will you resist the temptation to get a government handout for your community? Realize that the doctor’s fight against socialized medicine is your fight. We can’t socialize the doctors without socializing the patients. Recognize that government invasion of public power is eventually an assault upon your own business. If some among you fear taking a stand because you are afraid of reprisals from customers, clients, or even government, recognize that you are just feeding the crocodile hoping he’ll eat you last.

If all of this seems like a great deal of trouble, think what’s at stake. We are faced with the most evil enemy mankind has known in his long climb from the swamp to the stars. There can be no security anywhere in the free world if there is no fiscal and economic stability within the United States. Those who ask us to trade our freedom for the soup kitchen of the welfare state are architects of a policy of accommodation.

They say the world has become too complex for simple answers. They are wrong. There are no easy answers, but there are simple answers. We must have the courage to do what we know is morally right. Winston Churchill said that “the destiny of man is not measured by material computation. When great forces are on the move in the world, we learn we are spirits–not animals.” And he said, “There is something going on in time and space, and beyond time and space, which, whether we like it or not, spells duty.”

You and I have a rendezvous with destiny. We will preserve for our children this, the last best hope of man on earth, or we will sentence them to take the first step into a thousand years of darkness. If we fail, at least let our children and our children’s children say of us we justified our brief moment here. We did all that could be done.

Original Artical

You Decide: Are You a Democrat, Republican or Southerner?

 Amusing  Comments Off on You Decide: Are You a Democrat, Republican or Southerner?
Feb 212008
 

Are you a Democrat, Republican or Southerner? You decide. Here is a little test that will help you decide. The answer can be found by posing the following question: You’re walking down a deserted street with your wife and two small children. Suddenly, an Islamic Terrorist with a huge knife comes around the corner, locks eyes with you. He screams obscenities, praises Allah, raises the knife, and charges at you. You are carrying a Glock 40 cal pistol, and you are an expert shot. You have mere seconds before he reaches you and your family.

What do you do?


Democrat’s Answer:


Well, that’s not enough information to answer the question!
Does the man look poor? Or oppressed?
Have I ever done anything to him that would inspire him to attack?
Could we run away?
What does my wife think?
What about the kids?
What does the law say about this situation?
Why am I carrying a loaded gun anyway, and what kind of message does this send to society and to my children?
Does he definitely want to kill me, or would he be content just to wound me?
Should I call 9-1-1?
Why is this street so deserted?
What can I do to understand his behavior, to relate to his concerns?
We need to raise taxes, have paint and weed day and make this a happier, healthier street that would discourage such behavior.


Republican’s Answer:


BANG!


Southerner’s Answer:


BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG! Click….. (Sounds of reloading) BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG! Click

Daughter: ‘Nice grouping, Daddy! Were those the Winchester Silver Tips or Hollow Points?’

Son: ‘Can I shoot the next one?!’

Wife: ‘You ain’t taking that to the taxidermist!

Taxes: Comparing Democrats to Republicans

 Amusing  Comments Off on Taxes: Comparing Democrats to Republicans
Feb 212008
 

Here is some very interesting information that was passed on to me. You might want to consider this before you vote.

The data was gathered from The Tax Foundation.

Taxes under Clinton 1999 : Taxes under Bush 2008

Single making 30K – tax $8,400 : Single making 30K – tax $4,500

Single making 50K – tax $14,000 : Single making 50K – tax $12,500

Single making 75K – tax $23,250 : Single making 75K – tax $18,750

Married making 60K – tax $16,800 : Married making 60K- tax $9,000

Married making 75K – tax $21,000 : Married making 75K – tax $18,750

Married making 125K – tax $38,750 : Married making 125K – tax $31,250

If you want to know just how effective the mainstream media is, it is
amazing how many people that fall into the categories above think
Bush is screwing them and Bill Clinton was the greatest President
ever. If any Democrat is elected, ALL of them say they will repeal
the Bush tax cuts and a good portion of the people that fall into the
categories above can’t wait for it to happen. This is like the movie
The Sting with Paul Newman; you scam somebody out of some money and
they don’t even know what happened.