The 2020 Election: The Facts They Don’t Want You to See

 Conspiracy, Featured, Political  Comments Off on The 2020 Election: The Facts They Don’t Want You to See
Sep 292025
 

The 2020 election had many red flags. Explore the timeline of strange events, cover-ups, and voting irregularities they dismissed.

Let’s be honest. You felt it. That nagging feeling in the back of your mind on election night that something was off. The strange pauses in the vote counting. The flood of headlines telling you everything was fine, to just move on.

What if that feeling was right?

I’m not here to tell you what to think. I’m here to ask the questions that have been swept under the rug. I’m here to look at the pieces that, when put together, form a picture that is deeply troubling for anyone who believes in a government of, by, and for the people.

The Midnight Vote Dumps

Remember watching the returns? In several key states, the counting just… stopped. Officials in places like Detroit and Philadelphia came on camera, looking tired, and said they were going home for the night. They told everyone to get some sleep.

But then, in the dead of night, something strange happened. Vote totals exploded in these specific cities, and the numbers were so one-sided it defied belief. We’re talking about massive batches of votes, all reported at once, with a nearly 100% rate for Joe Biden.

Think about that for a second. In a free country, with a diverse population, do you ever see 100% of any large group agree on anything? It doesn’t happen in your family. It doesn’t happen in your town. So how could it happen in a major American city? This wasn’t a slow and steady climb. It was a vertical spike. That kind of statistical anomaly is a red flag the size of a billboard. It tells you that the input isn’t natural. It’s manufactured.

The Curious Case of the Mail-In Ballots

Now, let’s talk about the mail. In 2020, the rules for voting were changed in unprecedented ways. Secretaries of state and courts, not your elected legislatures, made last-minute decisions that opened the door to mass, unsolicited mail-in voting.

This created a system ripe for confusion and, frankly, manipulation.

We were told there was no evidence of widespread problems. But how could they know? The system was brand new and full of holes.

Think about the chain of custody. A ballot leaves the election office. It goes to a house, maybe one where a former resident moved away years ago. It gets delivered to a mailbox, sitting unattended. Who fills it out? Who returns it? In many states, they removed the basic security step of requiring a signature to be verified against one on file.

They also created something called “ballot harvesting,” where political operatives can go and collect thousands of ballots from people. There is no official oversight. There’s no camera watching. What stops someone from gently suggesting how an elderly person should vote? Or from simply tossing a bundle of ballots they don’t like into a dumpster? The entire process was built on trust in a system that had proven itself untrustworthy.

The Hunter Biden Laptop Cover-Up

This is where the media and the government crossed a line from negligence to active participation.

Just weeks before the election, the New York Post broke a story about a laptop abandoned at a repair shop by Hunter Biden. The emails on that laptop were a bombshell. They suggested that Hunter Biden was selling access to his father, Joe Biden. They detailed meetings with business partners from Ukraine and China, with discussions about multi-million dollar deals.

But instead of investigating the story, the establishment media worked to discredit it. Fifty-one intelligence officials signed a letter claiming it had the classic earmarks of a Russian disinformation campaign. They had no proof. They just said it looked that way. Social media giants, primarily Facebook and Twitter, took the extraordinary step of blocking people from sharing the story or even sending it via private message.

Ask yourself: if the story was false, why not let it be published and debunked in the open? Why use the power of big tech and the shadow of intelligence agencies to suppress it? The act of silencing a story about a candidate’s family, just before an election, is a form of election interference. It prevented voters from having all the information. They decided what you were allowed to know.

The Standalone Voting Machines

This is where it gets technical, but stick with me. It’s important.

Machines counted the votes in many of the contested areas. These machines were not simple calculators. They were complex computers running software. And here’s the first problem: forensic audits found that many were connected to the internet.

Election officials in some areas swore they were not. But we have public records showing these machines had modems and connected to IP addresses. Why does a voting machine need to phone home? The very idea is a security nightmare.

Then there’s the software itself. It was a black box. Independent experts were not allowed to inspect the code to see how it worked. We’re just supposed to trust the company that made it. When affidavits from hundreds of poll watchers described suspicious activity, their testimony was dismissed. The machines were deemed reliable by the very people who bought them.

So, Where Do We Go From Here?

They tell you to “trust the process.” They say the courts looked at all this and found no evidence. But many cases were dismissed on technicalities, like “standing,” which just means the judge ruled the person suing didn’t have the right to sue. They never looked at the evidence itself.

This isn’t about Donald Trump or Joe Biden. This is about something much bigger. It’s about the integrity of the system itself. When you have a perfect storm of questionable mail-in ballots, suspect voting machines, and an active media cover-up of a story damaging to one candidate, how can anyone have confidence?

You are not a fool for wanting answers. You are a patriot.

Don’t let them shame you into silence. Talk to your neighbors. Look at the timelines and the data for yourself. Demand that your local election officials provide proof of their processes—hand counts, paper trails, and no internet-connected machines.

The truth about the 2020 election has been buried under a mountain of dismissals and censorship. But it has a way of coming out. It may take time, but people are waking up. This isn’t over. It’s just beginning. Your voice matters. Use it.

The Case for Military Tribunals in a Broken Republic

 Conspiracy, Featured, Political  Comments Off on The Case for Military Tribunals in a Broken Republic
Jul 292025
 

Ex-presidents, betrayal, and a broken system: Why military tribunals become the last defense against internal coup attempts.

Let’s start with a simple question: What do you do when the people in charge of enforcing the law are the ones breaking it? We’re not talking about petty crimes here. Imagine a scenario where powerful figures—those with access to secrets, soldiers, and the machinery of government—use their positions to destabilize the very nation they swore to protect. When ordinary courts can’t—or won’t—hold them accountable, what’s left?

This is where military tribunals come into play. These are special courts, separate from civilian systems, designed to handle cases involving national security breaches, espionage, or threats to the structure of government itself. They’re not the first option. They’re the last.

The Unseen Line Between Order and Chaos

Military tribunals exist for one reason: to address failures in the normal legal process. Think of them as an emergency brake. If a group inside the government—say, high-ranking officials or even a former leader—works to sabotage elections, spread disinformation to incite violence, or manipulate foreign alliances to weaken the sitting president, the fallout could collapse public trust overnight.

But why not let regular courts handle it? Because influence spreads like poison. A former president might still control loyalists in key positions—judges, lawmakers, agency heads. Evidence could “disappear.” Witnesses might fear retaliation. In extreme cases, the threat isn’t just to individuals but to the integrity of the nation’s survival.

A Hypothetical That’s Closer to Home Than You Think

Picture this: A former president secretly collaborates with mid-level military officers, sympathetic media figures, and bureaucrats to destabilize the current administration. Fake documents leak, suggesting the new president plans to dissolve Congress. Protests erupt, funded by offshore accounts tied to the former leader. Key defense personnel “lose” communication with command chains during a critical moment.

This isn’t just rebellion. It’s a calculated strike at the heart of democracy. Ordinary courts might stall for years arguing over jurisdiction, evidence rules, or free speech protections. Meanwhile, the country burns. Military tribunals, operating under stricter secrecy and swift procedures, could isolate the perpetrators, protect whistleblowers, and neutralize the threat before it escalates to widespread violence.

History Shows Precedent—And Pitfalls

The U.S. has used military tribunals before, but sparingly. During the Civil War, President Lincoln suspended habeas corpus to detain Confederate sympathizers plotting to sabotage Union supply lines. In World War II, Nazi spies captured on U.S. soil faced military justice to prevent public trials from becoming propaganda tools.

These examples worked because the threats were obvious and existential. Critics argue tribunals risk bypassing civil liberties, and they’re right. But in cases where the corruption is systemic—when the rot is inside the house—the alternative is worse. Waiting for a broken system to fix itself is like hoping a shattered window will reglaze.

How Would It Actually Work?

First, the president or Congress would declare a state of emergency, citing specific actions that threaten national security. A panel of military judges, screened for neutrality, would review evidence behind closed doors. Charges might include treason, sedition, or conspiracy to overthrow the government. Proceedings would prioritize speed and secrecy to prevent further attacks.

Critics say this skips due process. Supporters argue that in rare cases, survival trumps tradition. To balance this, safeguards could include independent oversight (think retired judges or international observers) and strict limits on tribunal power—say, a 90-day window to try cases before reverting to civilian courts.

The Thin Edge of the Wedge: Could This Backfire?

Absolutely. Handing the military unchecked power is a recipe for tyranny. That’s why transparency matters after the crisis passes. All tribunal records would eventually be made public. Officials involved would face audits. Laws could sunset tribunal authority automatically unless renewed by Congress.

But let’s flip the script: If a shadow network inside the government successfully rigs elections, silences opponents, and seizes control of the military, what then? Tribunals aren’t perfect, but inaction guarantees collapse. Sometimes you have to fight fire with fire—just don’t let it burn down the neighborhood.

The Bottom Line: Fearless Questions, Uncomfortable Answers

Ask yourself: How much faith do you have in the people running the show? If your answer is “not much,” you’re not alone. Systems fail. People lie. Power corrupts. But in moments where deception becomes a weapon, and loyalty to a person outweighs loyalty to the constitution, extraordinary tools are needed.

Military tribunals are a danger… and sometimes a necessity. The key is knowing when to use them—and when to walk away. Because once you cross that line, there’s no easy return. But in the words of a general who once saved a republic: “The price of greatness is responsibility… and occasionally, getting your hands dirty.”

Rudy Giuliani Took Down the Mob. Is He Taking Down the Deep State Next?

 Conspiracy, Featured, Political  Comments Off on Rudy Giuliani Took Down the Mob. Is He Taking Down the Deep State Next?
Jul 282025
 

Rudy Giuliani helped crush the Mafia. Could he be helping Trump clean out Washington next?

The Man Who Took Down the Five Families

Rudy Giuliani doesn’t need an introduction. In the 1980s, when New York was drowning in organized crime, Giuliani stepped into the chaos and did the impossible. He used the law like a scalpel. He didn’t just arrest mobsters—he took down entire crime families. The Gambinos. The Genoveses. The Luccheses. All of them.

Back then, Giuliani didn’t chase headlines. He chased justice. And justice wasn’t popular with the people in charge.

Giuliani proved he could take on complex, powerful organizations that operated in secret and pulled strings behind the scenes. He didn’t blink. He didn’t back down. He knew how to win a war that couldn’t be fought in the open.

Which brings us to now.

What If the Same Skills Are in Play Again?

Let’s fast forward to 2025.

Donald Trump won the 2024 election. He’s back in the White House. And the air in Washington feels electric again. This time, the fight isn’t just about policy. It’s about cleaning house. It’s about exposing what’s been happening in the shadows since 2016—and maybe even before that.

Behind the scenes, whispers are getting louder.

The Department of Justice has just announced the formation of a new Strike Force. Their mission? Investigate Barack Obama and top officials from the Obama administration. People like Hillary Clinton, James Comey, John Brennan, and James Clapper. Names we’ve heard again and again.

The Strike Force is digging into what many have called a silent coup—a coordinated plan to block and remove Donald Trump from power before he could even take the oath of office in 2017.

But here’s the million-dollar question:

Is Rudy Giuliani helping lead this charge from the shadows?

Giuliani’s Playbook: Silence, Strategy, Precision

Let’s think clearly for a moment.

If you were launching a deep, surgical operation to take down powerful people who control media, intelligence, and finance—would you put your best strategist on camera every night?

Of course not.

You’d keep him out of the spotlight. You’d let him operate like he did in the mob trials—quietly, surgically, relentlessly.

That’s exactly what Giuliani might be doing now.

Keeping his name off the front page protects him. It keeps the media from launching daily smear campaigns. It stops the Deep State from turning its weapons on him. And it gives him room to operate with precision—just like he did when taking down the Mafia.

Giuliani doesn’t need attention. He needs results.

A War Much Bigger Than Politics

We’re not talking about a simple political rivalry. This isn’t Democrats vs. Republicans.

This is about a group of people who believe they’re above the will of the voters. People who have used the intelligence community, the media, and global institutions to push their version of control.

Giuliani’s experience makes him uniquely suited to this battle.

He understands how secret networks operate. He understands how they protect each other, how they launder influence, and how they hide in plain sight. He spent years prosecuting people who thought they’d never be touched.

And now, he might be bringing those same skills to Washington.

The Strike Force Has Teeth—And a Target

The DOJ’s new Strike Force isn’t just a political stunt.

It’s a sign that things are shifting.

According to DOJ insiders, the team is already gathering evidence that shows coordination between intelligence officials, political operatives, and media figures to undermine Trump’s first presidency. Documents, emails, texts—none of it looks good for the people involved.

We’re talking about an operation to interfere with an election and sabotage a sitting president.

It’s not a theory. It’s a crime.

If Giuliani is advising the Strike Force, even unofficially, then the people involved should be nervous. Very nervous.

Why the Media Is So Quiet About Giuliani

Let’s address the silence.

Giuliani has been suspiciously absent from mainstream news lately. That’s not because he’s irrelevant. It’s because the media doesn’t want to talk about what he’s doing.

Think about it.

The same media that ran 24/7 coverage during the Russia hoax has gone silent now that investigations are turning the other way. They’re not reporting. They’re protecting.

If Giuliani is working behind the curtain to dismantle the machine, then keeping him out of the news helps the mission. It’s not just strategy—it’s survival.

You don’t expose your knight until he’s ready to strike.

The Pattern Always Repeats

Look at the timeline.

In 2016, the Clinton campaign pushed the Russia story. Intelligence agencies played along. The FBI ran with it. The media amplified it.

It was coordinated. It was pre-planned.

Now, in 2025, the people who orchestrated it are being investigated. The same agencies that were used as weapons are being forced to answer for their actions.

And who better to help unravel a criminal network than the man who already did it once?

Giuliani was made for this moment.

What Comes Next?

The public should be watching carefully.

The DOJ Strike Force may be the most important investigation in modern history. It’s not just about politics. It’s about restoring trust. It’s about making sure the country is run by elected leaders, not unelected insiders.

Giuliani’s silence speaks volumes. His past proves he’s not afraid of powerful enemies. And the pieces are falling into place.

This time, the criminals aren’t wearing tracksuits and running numbers. They’re wearing suits and running agencies.

But Rudy’s been here before.

And if he is part of this fight—quietly, strategically, relentlessly—then the Deep State might finally have met its match.

A Short Story About The FBI

 Political  Comments Off on A Short Story About The FBI
Jul 302022
 

Once upon a long time ago, the FBI was created to fight organized crime. Then the FBI became organized crime. THE END