Senators Introduce Bill to Increase Domestic Oil and Natural Gas Production

 Amusing  Comments Off on Senators Introduce Bill to Increase Domestic Oil and Natural Gas Production
May 082008
 

The sad truth is that there is no shortage of oil in the U.S., just a shortage of politicians with enough sense to use it. ANWAR and other sources should have been opened years ago!

John McCain should jump all over this. This would be a HUGE vote getter. If presented wisely, opposition by any Democrat can be used against them given the current concerns of average Americans.

Senators Introduce Bill to Increase Domestic Oil and Natural Gas Production; Coal-Derived Fuel Mandate


US Senator Pete Domenici (R-NM), ranking member of the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee, introduced the American Energy Production Act of 2008 (S.2958) to increase domestic production of oil and natural gas and to fund the development of oil shale and coal-to-liquids technology. Eighteen other senators co-sponsored. Included in the bill is language for a coal-derived fuels mandate.

The bill would open up the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR) as well as the Atlantic and Pacific regions of the Outer Continental Shelf for exploration and production; and lift the one-year moratorium on developing oil shale in Colorado, Wyoming and Utah.

Specific provisions of the bill include:

  • Outer Continental Shelf. The bill allows petitions for leasing activities in the Atlantic and Pacific regions of the Outer Continental Shelf. The bill allows the Governors of coastal states to submit a petition for a lifting of the moratorium within their state boundaries. The bill creates a revenue sharing agreement for participating states in which 37.5% of revenues will go to new producing states, 12.5% to the Land and Water Conservation Fund, and 50% to the Federal Treasury.
  • ANWR. The bill establishes a competitive oil and gas leasing program for the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge Coastal Plain under the Mineral Leasing Act. It provides for a 50/50 share of ANWR revenues between the Federal Government and the State of Alaska. Directs that $35 million of the State share be deposited annually into a “Coastal Plain Local Government Impact Aid Assistance Fund” for Alaska communities.
  • Permitting. Repeals the $4,000 fee for new applications for permits to drill that was established in last year’s Omnibus Appropriations Bill.
  • Refineries. Grants the EPA authority to accept consolidated applications for permits required to construct and operate refineries, and authorizes financial assistance to states and Indian tribes for the hiring of personnel to process permits. Establishes a 360-day deadline for the approval or disapproval of consolidated permit applications for new refineries and a 120-day deadline for applications to expand existing refineries.
  • Strategic Petroleum Reserve. Suspends filling the Strategic Petroleum Reserve for 180 days.
  • Renewable Fuel and Advanced Energy Technology. Amends the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 to strike the definition of renewable biomass and replace it with the Senate-passed definition.
  • Establishes a program of direct loans and grants to accelerate the production of advanced batteries in the United States.
  • Establishes a research program to determine infrastructure needs for the transport of renewable fuel blends, and directs the Secretary of Energy to consider the compatibility of existing infrastructure with intermediate blends of renewable and petroleum based fuels.
  • Studies the environmental and efficiency attributes of diesel-fueled vehicles.
  • Coal-Derived Fuels. Mandates that 6 billion gallons of coal-derived fuels be produced by 2022, starting at 750 million gallons in 2015 and ramping up by that same amount annually. Requires that CTL fuels produced result in lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions not greater than those associated with gasoline and provides waiver authority based on economic or environmental harm.
  • Oil shale. Repeals the one year moratorium on funds to complete final regulations for the commercial leasing of oil shale established in last year’s Omnibus.
  • Increases the current allowable contract duration of five years to 25 years for procurement of synthetic fuels by the Department of Defense.
  • Repeals Section 526 of the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007, which prohibits federal agencies from procuring alternative fuels with lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions greater than those associated with conventional fuels that they replace.

Domenici and thirteen other Senators have asked the US Energy Information Administration (EIA) to analyze the impact the legislation will have on America’s reliance on foreign oil and energy prices as compared to forecasts the agency made in its Annual Energy Outlook 2008.

The EIA has assessed the impact of drilling in ANWR before. In March of 2004, the Energy Information Administration, at the request of Representative Richard W. Pombo, then Chairman of the US House Committee on Resources, published a report using government figures and analyzing the projected effect of drilling in ANWR. The report lays out three scenarios: one for low-oil resources, one the mean case, the other for high oil resources.

Some of the report’s findings:

  • The mean-case estimate is that there are 10.4 billion technically recoverable barrels of oil in ANWR, divided into many discrete fields. This estimate includes oil resources in Native lands and State waters out to a 3-mile boundary within the coastal plain area. The mean estimated size of oil resources in the Federal portion of the ANWR coastal plain is 7.7 billion barrels.
  • It will take approximately 10 years to bring the first field on-line (comparable to other Arctic drilling).
  • Assuming sequential development of the fields, rank ordered by size, ANWR production would peak, in the mean case scenario, in 2024 at 870,000 barrels of oil per day.
  • Assuming that every barrel of ANWR oil is consumed domestically, it would reduce imports on a barrel-for-barrel basis.

Co-sponsors of S.2958 include Senators Allard (R-CO); Barrasso (R-WY); Bennett (R-UT); Bond (R-MO); Bunning (R-KY); Chambliss (R-GA); Cornyn (R-TX); Enzi (R-WY); Hutchinson (R-TX); Inhofe (R-OK); Isakson (R-GA); McConnell (R-KY); Murkowski (R-AK); Sessions (R-AL); Stevens (R-AK); Thune (R-SD); Voinovich (R-OH); and Wicker (R-MS).


Tax Rebate Explained

 Amusing  Comments Off on Tax Rebate Explained
May 072008
 

If you don’t understand the Democrats’ version of tax refunds, maybe this will help explain it:

50,000 people went to a baseball game, but the game was rained out.
A refund was then due.

The team was about to mail refunds when a group of Congressional
Democrats stopped them and suggested that they send out the ticket
refunds based on the Democrat National Committee’s interpretation of
fairness.

Originally the refunds were to be paid based on the price each person
had paid for the tickets. Unfortunately that meant most of the refund
money would be going to the ticket holders that had purchased the most
expensive tickets. This, according to the DNC, is considered totally
unfair. A decision was then made to pay out the refunds in this manner:

People in the $10 seats will get back $15. After all, they have less
money to spend on tickets to begin with. Call it an “Earned Income Ticket
Credit.” Persons “earn” it by having few skills, poor work habits, and
low ambition, thus keeping them at entry-level wages

People in the $25 seats will get back $25, because it “seems fair.”

People in the $50 seats will get back $1, because they already make a
lot of money and don’t need a refund. After all, if they can afford a
$50 ticket, they must not be paying enough taxes.

People in the $75 luxury box seats will each have to pay an
additional $25 because it’s the “right thing to do”.

People walking past the stadium that couldn’t afford to buy a ticket
for the game each will get a $10 refund, even though they didn’t pay
anything for the tickets. They need the most help. Sometimes this is
known as Affirmative Action.

Now do you understand ?

If not, contact Representative Nancy Pelosi, Senator Ted Kennedy or
Senator Hillary Clinton for assistance.

Show Support For The Candidate Of Your Choice

 Amusing  Comments Off on Show Support For The Candidate Of Your Choice
May 052008
 

There are less than eight months until the election, an election that will decide the next President of the United States. The person elected will be the President of all Americans, not just the Democrats or the Republicans.

To show our solidarity as Americans, let’s all get together and show each other our support for the candidate of our choice. It’s time that we all came together, Democrats and Republicans alike.

If you support the policies and character of John McCain, please drive with your headlights on during the day.

If you support Barack Obama or Hillary Clinton, please drive with your headlights off at night.

When Democrats Are In Control

 Amusing  Comments Off on When Democrats Are In Control
May 022008
 


Do you remember the election in 2006 when the Democrats took over Congress? Well I thought you might like to know what has happened since Pelosi and pals have been in control.

A little over one year ago:
1) Consumer confidence stood at a 2 1/2 year high;
2) Regular gasoline sold for $2.19 a gallon;
3) The unemployment rate was 4.5%.

Since voting in a Democratic Congress in 2006 we have seen:
1) Consumer confidence plummet;
2) The cost of regular gasoline soar to over $3.50 a gallon;
3) Unemployment is up to 5% (a 10% increase);
4) American households have seen $2.3 trillion in equity value evaporate (stock and mutual fund losses);
5) Americans have seen their home equity drop by $1.2 trillion dollars;
6) 1% of American homes are in foreclosure.

America voted for change in 2006, and we got it! Remember, it’s Congress that makes law not the President. He has to work with what’s handed to him.

Joke Of The Day

 Jokes  Comments Off on Joke Of The Day
Apr 192008
 

A man walked into a very high-tech bar. As he sat down on a stool, he noticed that the bartender was a robot.

The robot clicked to attention and asked, “Sir, what will you have?”

The man thought a moment, then replied, “A martini, please”.

The robot clicked a couple of times and mixed the best martini the man had ever had.

The robot then asked, “Sir, what is your IQ?”

The man answered, “Oh, about 164. “

The robot then proceeded to discuss the theory of relativity, inter-stellar space travel, the latest medical breakthroughs, etc.

The man was most impressed. He left the bar, but thought he would try different tactic. He returned and took a seat.

Again, the robot clicked and asked what he would have.

A martini, please.”

Again it was superb.

The robot again asked, “What is your IQ, sir?”

This time the man answered, “Oh, about 100”. So the robot started

discussing NASCAR racing, bass fishing and what to expect the

Steelers to do this weekend.

The guy had to try it one more time. So he left, returned and took a stool . . . Again a martini, and the question

“What is your IQ?”

This time the man drawled out “Uh . . . ’bout 50.”

The robot clicked, then leaned close and very slowly asked,

“A-r-e y-o-u-r p-e-o-p-l-e r-e-a-l-l-y g-o-i-n-g t-o

n-o-m-i-n-a-t-e O-B-A-M-A ?