The Round Table Group

The Round Table Group was founded in 1891 by British imperialist Cecil Rhodes, who made a fortune in mining and diamond industries in Southern Africa. Rhodes envisioned a secret society that would work towards promoting the British Empire and furthering its influence across the globe. The group took its name from King Arthur's legendary round table, symbolizing equality and collaboration.

Throughout history, secretive organizations have captivated the imagination of many. One such group that has garnered attention and sparked countless conspiracies is the Round Table Group. With its origins rooted in the late 19th century, the Round Table Group has become a subject of fascination and speculation. This article aims to explore the history, objectives, and some of the conspiracies surrounding this enigmatic organization.

The Historical Origins

The Round Table Group was founded in 1891 by British imperialist Cecil Rhodes, who made a fortune in mining and diamond industries in Southern Africa. Rhodes envisioned a secret society that would work towards promoting the British Empire and furthering its influence across the globe. The group took its name from King Arthur’s legendary round table, symbolizing equality and collaboration.

Objectives and Influence

The primary objective of the Round Table Group was to maintain and expand the British Empire’s dominance. The members, consisting of influential figures from various fields, aimed to achieve this through a strategy known as “Anglo-Saxonism.” They sought to unite the English-speaking nations, including Britain, the United States, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand, to form an unbreakable alliance.

The Round Table Group played a significant role in shaping British foreign policy, particularly during the early 20th century. It exerted its influence through various channels, including influential think tanks, educational institutions, and political lobbying. The organization was instrumental in establishing the Royal Institute of International Affairs (RIIA) in London and its American counterpart, the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), in New York City. Both institutions have since played pivotal roles in shaping global affairs and policy.

Conspiracies Surrounding the Round Table Group

As with any secretive organization, the Round Table Group has attracted its fair share of conspiratorial claims. Here are a few notable theories:

  1. Global Domination: According to this theory, the Round Table Group is purported to be an elitist organization striving for global domination through control of world governments, economies, and resources. It alleges that the group influences key decision-makers and orchestrates events to serve its own interests.
  2. New World Order: This conspiracy theory suggests that the Round Table Group is part of a larger plan to establish a “New World Order.” It claims that the organization aims to create a unified global government, eroding national sovereignty and individual freedoms in the process.
  3. Manipulation of World Events: Some theories suggest that the Round Table Group plays a clandestine role in orchestrating significant world events, such as wars, financial crises, and political assassinations. Proponents of these theories argue that the organization operates behind the scenes, pulling the strings of power.
  4. Secretive Control of Media: Another conspiracy alleges that the Round Table Group controls mainstream media outlets, allowing it to shape public opinion, suppress dissent, and control the dissemination of information.

The shadows cast by the Round Table Group stretch far and wide, leaving a trail of suspicion, manipulation, and hidden agendas. While its stated objective was the maintenance of the British Empire’s dominance, there are darker theories that suggest a more sinister motive.

Conspiracy theories surrounding the Round Table Group paint a grim picture of a clandestine organization seeking nothing less than total global control. These theories propose that the group manipulates world events, controls governments and economies, and molds public opinion through its influence over mainstream media. The idea of a hidden elite orchestrating wars, financial crises, and political assassinations to further their own agenda is chilling, to say the least.

The concept of a “New World Order” emerges from the shadows, suggesting that the Round Table Group is just one piece of a larger puzzle—a puzzle that aims to dismantle national sovereignty, erode personal freedoms, and establish a monolithic global government. The implications of such a scenario are dystopian, where individual autonomy is crushed, dissent is silenced, and power lies firmly in the hands of a select few.

While it is vital to approach conspiracy theories with skepticism and critical thinking, dismissing them entirely would be a disservice to the pursuit of truth. The influence wielded by secretive organizations is undeniable, and history has shown that power often rests in the hands of a privileged few. The Round Table Group, with its web of connections and far-reaching influence, remains a compelling subject of speculation, inviting us to question the forces that shape our world.

In the end, the Round Table Group serves as a reminder that the pursuit of power and control can lead down dark paths. As we navigate the complexities of global affairs, it is crucial to remain vigilant, question the motives of those in positions of influence, and strive for a world where transparency, justice, and individual liberties prevail.

 



Treason!

When a President is illegally installed, everything that follows is Treason.


When a President is illegally installed, everything that follows is Treason.

Operation Mockingbird: Its Lingering Influence on State-Run Media

Though Operation Mockingbird is often associated with the Cold War era, its implications and influence continue to resonate in the media today. The legacy of Operation Mockingbird has cast a long shadow on modern media, raising concerns about propaganda, gaslighting, disinformation, and the erosion of journalistic integrity.

Though Operation Mockingbird is often associated with the Cold War era, its implications and influence continue to resonate in the media today. The legacy of Operation Mockingbird has cast a long shadow on modern media, raising concerns about propaganda, gaslighting, disinformation, and the erosion of journalistic integrity.

The Origins of Operation Mockingbird

Operation Mockingbird is believed to have started in the early 1950s, a time when the United States was engaged in a tense ideological battle against the Soviet Union. The primary aim was to counter communist influence and shape public opinion, both domestically and internationally. By infiltrating the media, the CIA sought to promote its own narratives and propaganda, shaping public perceptions in line with its agenda.

Influence and Manipulations

The tactics employed by Operation Mockingbird are multifaceted and are still in effect today. The CIA provides journalists with sensitive information, often presenting it as leaks or exclusives. In return, journalists follow the agency’s guidance on what to cover or how to spin certain stories. Covert funding is also used to support media organizations sympathetic to the CIA’s objectives, ensuring their compliance with the agency’s narrative.

Operation Mockingbird compromised the integrity of journalism and eroded the public’s trust in the media. It created an environment where journalists became unwitting or willing conduits for government propaganda, blurring the line between information and disinformation.

Government-Sponsored Propaganda

One of the key aspects of Operation Mockingbird was the dissemination of government propaganda through media channels. While the explicit control over news organizations may have diminished, government-sponsored messaging remains prevalent today. Governments around the world employ public relations campaigns, strategic leaks, and media manipulation to shape public opinion and advance their agendas. This contemporary manifestation shares similarities with the objectives of Operation Mockingbird.

Embedded Journalism

Embedded journalism, where journalists are granted access to military operations and governmental activities, has become a common practice. While it can provide valuable insights, embedded journalism raises concerns about impartial reporting and the potential for journalists to become unwitting conduits for government narratives. This echoes the manipulation of journalists during Operation Mockingbird, where access to classified information and exclusive interviews was used to influence media coverage.

Corporate Influence on Media

While Operation Mockingbird primarily focused on the alleged infiltration of the CIA, today’s media landscape is also influenced by powerful corporations. The concentration of media ownership in the hands of a few conglomerates raises questions about editorial independence and potential biases. Corporate interests can shape the news through editorial decisions, advertising pressures, and the promotion of specific narratives that align with their agendas. This influence bears resemblance to the concerns raised by Operation Mockingbird about government control over media content.

Disinformation and Psychological Operations

Operation Mockingbird operated in an era prior to the internet and social media. However, the principles of manipulating information and influencing public opinion are still applicable today. The rise of social media platforms has provided new avenues for disinformation campaigns, fake news, and psychological operations. These tactics, used by state actors, political groups, and even individuals, can distort public discourse, sow division, and erode trust in the media, mirroring some effects attributed to Operation Mockingbird.

Whistleblower Revelations

Over the years, whistleblowers and investigative journalists have shed light on government activities, revealing instances of covert influence on the media. These revelations, such as those brought forth by Edward Snowden and WikiLeaks, demonstrate that attempts to shape public perception through media manipulation persist, albeit in different forms. The existence of these whistleblowers shows that aspects of Operation Mockingbird may still be in effect today, even if under different names or through new channels.

While the direct continuation of Operation Mockingbird in its original form is difficult to prove, its legacy casts a long shadow over the modern media landscape. Concerns surrounding media consolidation, political influence, disinformation, and intelligence agency relations persist, reminding us of the importance of a vigilant and independent press. Understanding the historical context of Operation Mockingbird empowers us to scrutinize media narratives and advocate for transparency, journalistic integrity, and the free flow of information in today’s one sided media environment.


The Wrong Gender

There is no way an entire generation decided they were the wrong gender on their own.


There is no way an entire generation decided they were the wrong gender on their own.

Load More