The 2020 Election: The Facts They Don’t Want You to See

 Conspiracy, Featured, Political  Comments Off on The 2020 Election: The Facts They Don’t Want You to See
Sep 292025
 

The 2020 election had many red flags. Explore the timeline of strange events, cover-ups, and voting irregularities they dismissed.

Let’s be honest. You felt it. That nagging feeling in the back of your mind on election night that something was off. The strange pauses in the vote counting. The flood of headlines telling you everything was fine, to just move on.

What if that feeling was right?

I’m not here to tell you what to think. I’m here to ask the questions that have been swept under the rug. I’m here to look at the pieces that, when put together, form a picture that is deeply troubling for anyone who believes in a government of, by, and for the people.

The Midnight Vote Dumps

Remember watching the returns? In several key states, the counting just… stopped. Officials in places like Detroit and Philadelphia came on camera, looking tired, and said they were going home for the night. They told everyone to get some sleep.

But then, in the dead of night, something strange happened. Vote totals exploded in these specific cities, and the numbers were so one-sided it defied belief. We’re talking about massive batches of votes, all reported at once, with a nearly 100% rate for Joe Biden.

Think about that for a second. In a free country, with a diverse population, do you ever see 100% of any large group agree on anything? It doesn’t happen in your family. It doesn’t happen in your town. So how could it happen in a major American city? This wasn’t a slow and steady climb. It was a vertical spike. That kind of statistical anomaly is a red flag the size of a billboard. It tells you that the input isn’t natural. It’s manufactured.

The Curious Case of the Mail-In Ballots

Now, let’s talk about the mail. In 2020, the rules for voting were changed in unprecedented ways. Secretaries of state and courts, not your elected legislatures, made last-minute decisions that opened the door to mass, unsolicited mail-in voting.

This created a system ripe for confusion and, frankly, manipulation.

We were told there was no evidence of widespread problems. But how could they know? The system was brand new and full of holes.

Think about the chain of custody. A ballot leaves the election office. It goes to a house, maybe one where a former resident moved away years ago. It gets delivered to a mailbox, sitting unattended. Who fills it out? Who returns it? In many states, they removed the basic security step of requiring a signature to be verified against one on file.

They also created something called “ballot harvesting,” where political operatives can go and collect thousands of ballots from people. There is no official oversight. There’s no camera watching. What stops someone from gently suggesting how an elderly person should vote? Or from simply tossing a bundle of ballots they don’t like into a dumpster? The entire process was built on trust in a system that had proven itself untrustworthy.

The Hunter Biden Laptop Cover-Up

This is where the media and the government crossed a line from negligence to active participation.

Just weeks before the election, the New York Post broke a story about a laptop abandoned at a repair shop by Hunter Biden. The emails on that laptop were a bombshell. They suggested that Hunter Biden was selling access to his father, Joe Biden. They detailed meetings with business partners from Ukraine and China, with discussions about multi-million dollar deals.

But instead of investigating the story, the establishment media worked to discredit it. Fifty-one intelligence officials signed a letter claiming it had the classic earmarks of a Russian disinformation campaign. They had no proof. They just said it looked that way. Social media giants, primarily Facebook and Twitter, took the extraordinary step of blocking people from sharing the story or even sending it via private message.

Ask yourself: if the story was false, why not let it be published and debunked in the open? Why use the power of big tech and the shadow of intelligence agencies to suppress it? The act of silencing a story about a candidate’s family, just before an election, is a form of election interference. It prevented voters from having all the information. They decided what you were allowed to know.

The Standalone Voting Machines

This is where it gets technical, but stick with me. It’s important.

Machines counted the votes in many of the contested areas. These machines were not simple calculators. They were complex computers running software. And here’s the first problem: forensic audits found that many were connected to the internet.

Election officials in some areas swore they were not. But we have public records showing these machines had modems and connected to IP addresses. Why does a voting machine need to phone home? The very idea is a security nightmare.

Then there’s the software itself. It was a black box. Independent experts were not allowed to inspect the code to see how it worked. We’re just supposed to trust the company that made it. When affidavits from hundreds of poll watchers described suspicious activity, their testimony was dismissed. The machines were deemed reliable by the very people who bought them.

So, Where Do We Go From Here?

They tell you to “trust the process.” They say the courts looked at all this and found no evidence. But many cases were dismissed on technicalities, like “standing,” which just means the judge ruled the person suing didn’t have the right to sue. They never looked at the evidence itself.

This isn’t about Donald Trump or Joe Biden. This is about something much bigger. It’s about the integrity of the system itself. When you have a perfect storm of questionable mail-in ballots, suspect voting machines, and an active media cover-up of a story damaging to one candidate, how can anyone have confidence?

You are not a fool for wanting answers. You are a patriot.

Don’t let them shame you into silence. Talk to your neighbors. Look at the timelines and the data for yourself. Demand that your local election officials provide proof of their processes—hand counts, paper trails, and no internet-connected machines.

The truth about the 2020 election has been buried under a mountain of dismissals and censorship. But it has a way of coming out. It may take time, but people are waking up. This isn’t over. It’s just beginning. Your voice matters. Use it.

The Tattooed Map: Hunter Biden’s Connection to the Finger Lakes Region

 Conspiracy, Featured, Political  Comments Off on The Tattooed Map: Hunter Biden’s Connection to the Finger Lakes Region
Apr 162024
 

A map, a memory, or a message? Explore the implications of Hunter Biden’s Finger Lakes back tattoo.

Intrigue and curiosity often whirl around public figures, weaving stories that range from inspiring to bewildering. Among these is Hunter Biden, a name that frequently graces the headlines, not just for his connection to the person presently occupying the White House, Joe Biden, but also for his personal choices that frequently attract public interest. Of the various stories and rumors that surround him, one particular detail stands out with a peculiar charm: his back tattoo. This isn’t just any tattoo. It’s a detailed, map-like representation of the Finger Lakes region in upstate New York. Now, why would someone get such a specific geographic area inked on their body? The answer might be more layered than we think.

The Finger Lakes: Not Just a Tourist Destination

Before diving into the depths of Hunter Biden’s ink, let’s paint a picture of the Finger Lakes region. This area, known for its serene beauty, is a sprawling canvas of 11 narrow lakes that stretch like fingers across upstate New York. It’s a haven for nature lovers, wine enthusiasts, and those seeking a tranquil escape. But beneath its picturesque surface, some whisper tales that flicker with shadows, suggesting that the region might not be just about picturesque trails and vineyard tours.

Among these whispers are claims that the Finger Lakes area is a hotspot for child trafficking and missing persons. Although these allegations are often met with skepticism and require a critical eye, they add an eerie layer to Hunter Biden’s choice of tattoo. It begs the question: Is there a deeper message or a connection, or is it merely a coincidence?

The Tattoo: A Map or a Message?

Hunter Biden’s back tattoo captures the intricate layout of the Finger Lakes with surprising accuracy. For those unaware, Hunter has openly shared his struggles with addiction and personal turmoil. It’s not uncommon for individuals to embed personal stories or symbols of significance into their tattoos. Could this tattoo be a cartographic memoir of a place with personal importance, or is it an enigmatic nod to the darker tales tied to the region?

Theories abound, but without a clear statement from Hunter himself about the tattoo’s significance, we’re left to navigate a maze of speculation and symbolism. Some see it as a bold statement, a piece of art etched in skin that carries a personal meaning known only to its bearer. Others can’t help but link it to the rumors that cast long shadows over the Finger Lakes.

The Conversation: From Ink to Inkling

Hunter Biden’s back tattoo has stirred more than just curiosity; it has ignited conversations about the intertwining of personal choices with public perceptions. Tattoos are often seen as expressions of self, a way to own one’s story, or perhaps to rewrite it. Yet, when the tattoo in question involves a public figure and a map of a region shadowed by controversy, the conversation shifts. It moves from personal aesthetics to potential symbolism, from individual choice to collective interpretation.

This controversy reflects the broader dynamics of how we view and interpret the actions of those in the public eye. In Hunter Biden’s case, his tattoo becomes more than skin deep—it’s a puzzle piece in the complex picture of a life lived under scrutiny.

The Finger Lakes Beyond the Ink

Putting aside the mystery of Hunter Biden’s tattoo for a moment, the Finger Lakes region does deserve attention for its own story, not just the tales whispered about it. This area is a testament to the power of nature, history, and culture meshing together to create a destination that calls to many. Whether it’s the natural beauty, the rich history, or the acclaimed wine country, the Finger Lakes are worth exploring in their own right, beyond the backdrop of any controversy.

It’s a region that tells many stories, from the indigenous peoples who first called it home to the modern communities that thrive there today. It holds within it the potential for adventure, reflection, and even a touch of mystery. But most importantly, it’s a reminder of the layers and complexities that exist in places, just as they do in people.

Conclusion: A Tattoo With Tales to Tell

In the end, the true significance of Hunter Biden’s Finger Lakes tattoo remains tucked away, perhaps known only to him. Whether it’s a personal homage to a beloved region, a cryptic message, or simply a piece of art that caught his fancy, it’s a choice that has sparked more questions than answers.

Yet, this tattoo—like all tattoos—serves as a testament to the power of ink to tell stories, evoke emotions, and, yes, sometimes, stir controversy. In a world where public and private lives blur, Hunter Biden’s back tattoo stands as a compelling reminder of how personal narratives, intentionally or not, can intertwine with broader societal tales. This leaves us all to wonder about the stories etched not just on skin but within the fabric of our collective consciousness.

There are no coincidences!

More for Ukraine

 Featured, Political, View Point  Comments Off on More for Ukraine
Feb 172024
 

Biden has done more for Ukraine in a single term than he's done for America in 50 years.


Biden has done more for Ukraine in a single term than he’s done for America in 50 years.

Follow the Money: Corruption and Ukraine

 Conspiracy, Featured, Political  Comments Off on Follow the Money: Corruption and Ukraine
Feb 132024
 

Discover the hidden truths behind Ukraine's leaders and their involvement in corruption.

As we delve into the murky world of corruption, Ukraine emerges as a prime example of how power and money can distort the best of intentions. The country has long been plagued by political and financial scandals, with billions of dollars in foreign aid disappearing without a trace. In this article, we will explore the history of corruption in Ukraine, focusing on the current leader, Volodymyr Zelenskyy, and the involvement of U.S. political figures. We will examine Zelenskyy’s net worth and multiple luxury homes as potential indicators of corruption. We will discuss why sending billions of dollars in foreign aid to Ukraine may not be the wisest decision due to the lack of transparency and accountability.

The History of Corruption in Ukraine

Corruption in Ukraine has been a persistent issue since the country gained independence from the Soviet Union in 1991. The country’s political and economic systems were built on a foundation of corruption, with bribery, cronyism, and embezzlement becoming the norm. The lack of transparency and accountability in the government allowed for widespread corruption to flourish, with politicians and businessmen enriching themselves at the expense of the Ukrainian people.

The Orange Revolution of 2004 was a turning point in Ukraine’s history, as it brought to light the extent of corruption within the government. The revolution was sparked by widespread allegations of electoral fraud, with then-President Viktor Yanukovych accused of rigging the election in his favor. The revolution led to the election of Viktor Yushchenko, who promised to tackle corruption and improve the country’s democratic institutions. However, despite some progress, corruption remained a significant issue in Ukraine, with the country consistently ranking low in global corruption rankings.

The Current Leader and His Alleged Corruption

The current leader of Ukraine is Volodymyr Zelenskyy, who was elected president in 2019 with a landslide victory of 73% of the vote. Zelenskyy is a former comedian and actor, who rose to fame with his TV show “Servant of the People,” where he played a teacher who becomes president after his anti-corruption rant goes viral. Zelenskyy ran on a platform of anti-corruption, anti-establishment, and pro-European integration, promising to end the war in the east, fight the oligarchs, and bring new faces and fresh ideas to politics.

However, after more than two years in office, Zelenskyy has failed to deliver on his promises and expectations. Instead of breaking the cycle of corruption, he has become part of it. Some allegations and evidence of his corruption are:

  • His net worth is estimated to be between $20 million and $30 million, which is far more than what he earned as a comedian or declared as his income. He has not explained the source of his wealth or how he acquired it.
  • He owns multiple luxury homes in Ukraine and abroad, including a mansion in Kyiv, a villa in Italy, and an apartment in London. He has not disclosed the value or ownership of these properties, or how he paid for them.
  • He is linked to Ihor Kolomoisky, one of the most notorious oligarchs in Ukraine, who is accused of embezzling billions of dollars from PrivatBank, the largest bank in the country, which was nationalized in 2016. Kolomoisky was the owner of the TV channel that aired Zelenskyy’s show and supported his presidential campaign. Zelenskyy has appointed several of Kolomoisky’s associates to key positions in his administration, and has resisted the efforts of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the United States to recover the stolen funds and bring Kolomoisky to justice.
  • He has interfered with the work of the anti-corruption agencies and the judiciary, which are supposed to be independent and impartial. He has dismissed, replaced, or pressured the heads of the National Anti-Corruption Bureau, the Specialized Anti-Corruption Prosecutor’s Office, and the Constitutional Court, who were investigating or ruling on cases involving him, his allies, or his opponents.
  • He has used his power to benefit his friends and family, who have gained access to lucrative contracts, positions, and privileges from the state. For example, his childhood friend and former lawyer, Andriy Yermak, is his chief of staff and one of the most influential figures in his administration. Yermak’s brother, Denys, is the deputy head of the Security Service of Ukraine, the main intelligence agency in the country. Yermak’s son, Oleksandr, is a member of parliament from Zelenskyy’s party and the head of the parliamentary committee on law enforcement.

The involvement of U.S. Political Figures

U.S. political figures have also been implicated in the corruption scandals surrounding Ukraine. One notable example is former Vice President Joe Biden, who has been accused of using his influence to help his son, Hunter Biden, secure a lucrative position on the board of a Ukrainian energy company. Biden allegedly threatened to withhold $1 billion in U.S. loan guarantees unless the Ukrainian government removed a prosecutor who was investigating the company.

Another example is former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, who was accused of using her position to secure favorable business deals for her family’s foundation. Clinton allegedly approved the sale of a uranium company with ties to Russia, despite concerns about potential conflicts of interest. In return, the company donated millions of dollars to the Clinton Foundation, raising questions about the influence of money in politics.

Why Sending Billions in Foreign Aid is a Bad Idea

Despite the rampant corruption in Ukraine, the United States has continued to send billions of dollars in foreign aid to the country. In 2020 alone, the U.S. provided $400 million in aid to Ukraine, with much of it going towards military and security assistance. However, without proper oversight and accountability measures, there is no guarantee that this aid will be used effectively or reach its intended recipients.

The lack of an audit trail in Ukraine makes it difficult to track the flow of funds and ensure that they are being used for their intended purposes. This has led to concerns that U.S. taxpayer dollars may be going towards corrupt politicians and businessmen, rather than supporting the Ukrainian people.

Conclusion

The history of corruption in Ukraine is a cautionary tale about the dangers of unchecked power and the importance of transparency and accountability in government. Despite the election of a new leader, Volodymyr Zelenskyy, who promised to tackle corruption, the country continues to struggle with political and financial scandals. The involvement of U.S. political figures in these scandals only serves to highlight the global nature of corruption and the need for greater oversight and accountability in all aspects of government. Until these issues are addressed, sending billions of dollars in foreign aid to Ukraine may not be the best use of resources, as there is no guarantee that the money will be used effectively or reach its intended recipients.



Things That Are NOT

 Featured, Political, View Point  Comments Off on Things That Are NOT
Jan 112024
 

The Earth is NOT overpopulated. Climate Change is NOT man-made. The jab is NOT a vaccine. Hunter's laptop is NOT Russian Disinformation. And Joe Biden is NOT president.

Things That Are NOT

The Earth is NOT overpopulated.
Climate Change is NOT man-made.
The jab is NOT a vaccine.
Hunter’s laptop is NOT Russian Disinformation.
And Joe Biden is NOT president.