Floating Hourglass

Video Description:

Two perspex tubes, filled with water. (In fact a little bit of water has evaporated over the years, so the tubes are not quite full any more). Each tube contains an hourglass; one is floating at the top of the tube, and the other one has sunk to the bottom of the tube. This is a stable state – everything will stay like this indefinitely.

When you turn the whole mechanism upside down, the hourglass that was floating at the top now stays at the bottom of the tube, and the hourglass that was at the bottom is now at the top of the tube. In other words, the hourglass that was previously floating is now at the bottom of the tube, and the hourglass that had sunk to the bottom is now at the top of the tube. How can this be? Are they in fact not freely floating/sinking at all, but fastened to the sides of the tube?

Even more mysterious is what happens next. After a minute or so, the hourglass that is now at the top of the tube sinks back to the bottom, and the hourglass at the bottom of the tube floats up to the top. In other words, each hourglass is now back in its original position.

How does this happen?

Way back in 1992, one of us sent one of these to Scot Morris in the USA, who wrote an article about it for OMNI Magazine. He explained what happened, and invited readers to come up with an explanation. Four months later, he had received 415 correct answers, and 618 incorrect answers.

Some people thought that heat was a factor – they thought that the falling sand generates heat, which heats the surrounding liquid, and so the hourglass stays down until the water cools down again. Although some people thought the falling sand heated up the air inside the hourglass, making it expand slightly, and thus rise.

Other solutions involved a flexible hourglass – when the sand is falling, it presses down, and causes the hourglass to widen, thus wedging it in position, until the sand stops falling. Some thought it was to do with the ‘impact’ of the falling sand hitting the bottom of the glass.

There were a variety of other explanations, including some that thought the whole thing was an illusion! However the correct answer is as follows.

One hourglass is slightly positively buoyant, and the other one is slightly negatively buoyant. so the starting position is that one glass is at the top of its tube, and the other is at the bottom. However when you turn the device upside down, each inverted hourglass now has sand at the top, and air at the bottom. This makes it top heavy, or bottom buoyant if you like, and it has a tendency to try and flip over. However it cannot do this because it fits fairly snugly within the tube. But the effect is that it wedges itself in, and it is held in place by friction. Technically this is static friction, which is sometimes called ‘ stiction’.

As the sand falls through the hourglass, its tendency to flip over is reduced, until it ‘unsticks’ from the side, and positively buoyant glass floats to the top, and the other descends to the bottom. The trick depends on the two hourglasses being only slightly positively or negatively buoyant. Were this not the case, their natural buoyancy would be strong enough to overcome the ‘stiction’ effect immediately, and the trick would not work.

Riding a Dead Horse

The tribal wisdom of the Dakota Indians, passed on from generation to generation, says that when you discover that you are riding a dead horse, the best strategy is to dismount.

In modern education and government, however, a whole range of far more advanced strategies are often employed, such as:

1. Buying a stronger whip.

2. Changing riders.

3. Threatening the horse with termination.

4. Appointing a committee to study the horse.

5. Visiting other sites to see how others ride dead horses.

6. Lowering the standards so that dead horses can be included.

7. Re-classifying the dead horse as “living, impaired”.

8. Hiring outside contractors to ride the dead horse.

9. Harnessing several dead horses together to increase the speed.

10. Attempting to mount multiple dead horses in hopes that one of them will spring to life.

11. Providing additional funding and/or training to increase the dead horse’s performance.

12. Doing a productivity study to see if lighter riders would improve the dead horse’s performance.

13. Declaring that as the dead horse does not have to be fed, it is less costly, carries lower overhead, and therefore contributes substantially more to the bottom line of the economy than do some other horses.

14. Re-writing the expected performance requirements for all horses.

15. Promoting the dead horse to a supervisory position.

Load More