Mar 142017
 
Paul Ryan received funds from a Democratic organization called “ActBlue”. He’s one of two Republicans on the list. The other is Rob Portman of Ohio.

Paul Ryan Received Funds From A Democratic Organization Called "ActBlue"

Quick rundown on ActBlue:
ActBlue bills itself as “the online clearinghouse for Democratic action.” As a federally registered political action committee, it serves as a conduit for online contributions to Democratic candidates and committees. That is, ActBlue bundles and transmits earmarked contributions from individuals raised on their website to specific candidates.

The organization assists Democratic candidates and committees of all ideological persuasion, helping moderates and liberals alike. Through mid-2010, it has helped funnel more than $134 million — and counting — in contributions. Because much of that money comes in donations below the $200 threshold for itemized disclosure, the total amount given by donors via ActBlue is considerably greater than the totals listed below, which are based on FEC filings of candidates and committees that receive this money.

Their summary on Twitter reads:
“Our mission is to democratize power by putting powerful fundraising tools in the hands of grassroots donors across the United States.”

GRASSROOTS

Tied to Shareblue as shown here in a 2015 tweet:
https://twitter.com/Shareblue/status/654335670404653056

This organization is always tagged with things like “resist” and resist accounts on Twitter.
https://twitter.com/Jkineman/status/838848995539599360

Guess who received funds from Act Blue? Hillary Clinton, Nancy Pelosi, Bernie Sanders and..

PAUL RYAN

https://www.opensecrets.org/orgs/recips.php?id=D000021806

This is like one big naughty list.

Paul Ryan Received Funds From A Democratic Organization Called "Act Blue"

Seems they are rewording their apps and website now that people are taking notice.
http://archive.is/bxzZ1
http://archive.is/AzsgF

 
H/T Reddit

Mar 052017
 
Senate Democrats posted her impassioned plea on their Facebook page as ‘Words Of Inspiration’

[arve url=”https://commonsenseevaluation.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/Loretta-Lynch-Need-more-marching-blood-death-on-streets.mp4″ /]

The Obama administration’s former Attorney General Loretta Lynch has made an impassioned video plea for more marching, blood and death on the streets – a video that was later posted on the Facebook page of Senate Democrats as “words of inspiration.”

The video is less than a minute long and begins by stating that people are experiencing “great fear and uncertainty,” with the unstated implication it is due to Donald Trump’s takeover of the White House.

Without offering any specifics, Lynch goes on to say that “our rights” are “being assailed, being trampled on and even being rolled back.”

But the strongest words come in a statement that seems to suggest the answer is street action that will inevitably turn bloody and deadly.

“I know that this is a time of great fear and uncertainty for so many people,” Lynch says. “I know it’s a time of concern for people, who see our rights being assailed, being trampled on and even being rolled back. I know that this is difficult, but I remind you that this has never been easy. We have always had to work to move this country forward to achieve the great ideals of our Founding Fathers.”

Lynch, who is scheduled to receive the Thomas Jefferson Foundation Medal of Law from the University of Virginia, goes on to say: “It has been people, individuals who have banded together, ordinary people who simply saw what needed to be done and came together and supported those ideals who have made the difference. They’ve marched, they’ve bled and yes, some of them died. This is hard. Every good thing is. We have done this before. We can do this again.”

She is officially in violation of Title 18 U.S. Code § 2102. Inciting riots. Time to round her up.

18 U.S. Code § 2102

Click to enlarge

 
via

Study: Mainstream Media Coverage Of Trump’s First Month 88 Percent “Hostile”

 Political  Comments Off on Study: Mainstream Media Coverage Of Trump’s First Month 88 Percent “Hostile”
Mar 032017
 
A “Meticulous” study conducted by the Media Research Center found that 88% of broadcast news coverage on President Trump and his administration was “Hostile” during his first 30 days in office.

Study Mainstream Media Coverage Of Trump’s First Month 88 Percent “Hostile”

The antagonism between Trump and the “Mainstream Media” is no secret, with Trump recently calling corporate-owned news media the “Enemy of the American People.” Now a new study, conducted by the Media Research Center (MRC), has confirmed that the media’s coverage of Trump has been anything but balanced, with 88% of all news coverage of the administration within its first 30 days in office found to be overtly “hostile.” The study analyzed evening newscasts on the “Big Three” networks – ABC, NBC, and CBS – for both tone and content during Trump’s first month in the White House. They found that the three networks had collectively produced around 16 hours of coverage on Trump and his administration, representing 54% of their total coverage for the entire month.

“Our measure of media tone excludes sound-bites from identified partisans, focusing instead on tallying the evaluative statements made by reporters and the nonpartisan talking heads (experts and average citizens) included in their stories,” wrote Rich Noyes – research director for the MRC – along with fellow MRC analyst Mike Ciandella. “Our measure of media tone excludes sound-bites from identified partisans, focusing instead on tallying the evaluative statements made by reporters and the nonpartisan talking heads (experts and average citizens) included in their stories,” the pair added.

Trump bad press 30 days

Despite the study’s focus on allegedly nonpartisan journalists and experts, the networks were found to have filled their stories with quotes largely from citizens angry about Trump’s policies, giving minimal airtime to Trump supporters. It was also found that reporters “often injected their own anti-Trump editorial tone into the coverage. ‘It has been a busy day for presidential statements divorced from reality,’ CBS Evening News anchor Scott Pelley […] began his February 6 broadcast.”

The study also noted that Trump’s so-called “Muslim ban” drew the most negative coverage, netting over three hours in total, though the border wall issue was a close second. The study also reported that “nearly an hour of coverage (56 minutes) was given over to anti-Trump protests on various topics, with nearly one-fifth (82 out of 442) of the Trump stories or briefs aired during these 30 days including at least some discussion of an anti-Trump protest.”

A previous MRC study had found that negative coverage of his campaign was similarly high with 91% of broadcast coverage at the time found to cast the Trump campaign in a negative light. With trust in the media at an all-time low and with a majority of Americans believing that the media is too critical of Trump, this latest study only confirms that the mainstream media remains remarkably out of touch with the average American.

 
By Whitney Webb

Babbling Pelosi

 Political  Comments Off on Babbling Pelosi
Mar 022017
 

Nancy Pelosi, when asked, why exactly she demands that Jeff Sessions resign:
(Sorry, I can’t help myself, I love this clip too much!)

She’s totally lost it!

 

 
H/T Reddit

Propaganda Techniques

 Political  Comments Off on Propaganda Techniques
Mar 012017
 

An educational film to teach viewers about the dynamics of propaganda, made in the in the late 1940’s or early 1950’s.

A teacher dissects the processes in which propaganda works to an eager student. In it are moments of classic hokum, but curiously it all rings true today.

Beware of Propaganda!