In light of the Seth Rich “Coincidence”, Here is an info-graphic and PDF to refresh people’s memories.
[pdf-embedder url=”https://commonsenseevaluation.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/THE-CLINTON-BODY-COUNT-1.pdf” title=”THE CLINTON BODY COUNT”]
Tag: Debbie Wasserman Schultz
The DNC In Full Attack Mode
DNC IS IN FULL ATTACK MODE!! SETH RICH EVIDENCE EMERGES, WHICH ALSO BRINGS JOE MONTANO AND SHAWN LUCAS’S MURDERS BACK INTO THE SPOTLIGHT, AND AN $85 MILLION LAWSUIT FOR RIGGING THE PRIMARIES; WHICH THEY CANT AFFORD TO PAY!!
Remember, they didn’t just kill Seth Rich, but also Shawn Lucas, and Joe Montano. The link is the rigging of the convention and what that could mean for the survival of the DNC.
Seth Rich (died July 10th, 2016) leaked the Hillary emails to Wikileaks, which contained evidence which could be used to prove fraud at the convention.
Joe Montano (died July 25th, 2016) was the DNC chairman just before Wasserman Schultz took over. He could have been called as a witness.
Shawn Lucas (died Aug 2nd, 2016) spearheaded a class action lawsuit against the Wasserman Schultz rigging the DNC primary, stemming from Guccifer 2.0 leaked emails (prior to Wikileaks).
Wasserman Schultz tried to have the lawsuit delayed for months due to improper service, however video evidence clearly shows proper service:
Lawsuit against Debbie Wasserman moves forward: http://observer.com/2016/08/class-action-lawsuit-against-debbie-wasserman-schultz-moves-forward/
Lawsuit still ongoing, donors seeking repayment: http://www.newsweek.com/bernie-sanders-rigged-hillary-clinton-dnc-lawsuit-donald-trump-president-609582
The fact that the lawsuit is demanding repayment of donations is huge. The DNC doesn’t have that kind of money: $85 million dollars. The DNC currently has $11 million on hand: https://www.opensecrets.org/parties/totals.php?cmte=DNC&cycle=2016
If they are forced to repay they are bankrupt. They can’t expect to legally raise tens of millions of dollars from their supporters, people they have been proven to have defrauded.
THE DEMOCRATS ARE PULLING EVERY DIRTY TRICK THEY HAVE TO DISTRACT THE PUBLIC!! ALOT OF PEOPLE FALL FOR THESE UNSUBSTANTIATED ANONYMOUS SOURCES UNFORTUNATELY… SPREAD THIS INFORMATION, EVICERATE THESE SCUM AND BRING JUSTICE TO THE DECEASED AND THEIR FAMILIES! THEY ARE SCARED; SHILL ARE OUT IN FULL FORCE LIKE I HAVE NEVER SEEN. FIGHT BACK!! THEY WILL NOT REST!
DNC Admits They Had The Legal Right To Rig 2016 Primaries
Screw the people! The lawsuit, filed against the Democratic National Committee, and its former chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz, by Bernie Sanders donors reveals the DNC believes its own rules of impartiality don’t apply, and they can pick whatever candidate they wish.
Last year, the political election process exposed Americans to more corruption and vote rigging than at any time in their history. Now, a recent lawsuit has exposed that this corruption and fraud is actually standard operating procedure. The lawsuit, filed against the Democratic National Committee, and its former chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz, by Bernie Sanders donors reveals the DNC believes its own rules of impartiality don’t apply, and they can pick whatever candidate they wish. “We could have voluntarily decided that, ‘Look, we’re gonna go into back rooms like they used to and smoke cigars and pick the candidate that way,” DNC’s lawyer Bruce Spiva told a Florida court. The lawsuit, originally filed in June, accuses the DNC and its former chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz of seven different violations, including fraud, negligent misrepresentation, unjust enrichment, and negligence. As RT reports,
People paid money in reliance on the understanding that the primary elections for the Democratic nominee—nominating process in 2016 were fair and impartial,” the plaintiff’s lawyer Jared Beck said. “And that’s not just a bedrock assumption that we would assume just by virtue of the fact that we live in a democracy, and we assume that our elections are run in a fair and impartial manner.” “But that’s what the Democratic National Committee’s own charter says. It says it in black and white.” However impartiality was nowhere to be found. Beginning in Iowa and eventually getting blown wide open in Arizona, the fraud and suppression of votes quickly let Americans know that the DNC was set in their rigging ways. Examples of this fraud were captured on video, documented on paper, and even broadcast live on television. The defendants, in their motion to dismiss the lawsuit, argued that a judge cannot determine how the DNC carries out its nomination process, noting that it would “drag the Court right into the political squabbles.” However, Judge Zlock responded by saying, “So you are suggesting that this is just part of the business, so to speak, that it’s not unusual for, let’s say, the DNC, the RNC to take sides with respect to any particular candidate and to support that candidate over another?” And that is exactly what voters witnessed last year. The mainstream media was even complicit in the selection of Hillary Clinton over Sanders. A firestorm exploded when the AP abruptly announced Clinton had garnered sufficient delegates and superdelegates to clinch the nomination — before California even held its primary. Irate voters justifiably condemned the inexplicable announcement as premature, especially in light of California polls showing Clinton outpaced by or neck and neck with Bernie Sanders. Whether or not the judge will rule to dismiss the case remains unknown. However, if it does go to court, Wasserman Schultz and others would be forced to give depositions. And, during these depositions, evidence from WikiLeaks, Guccifer and others will be presented. Make no mistake, the DNC admitting to having the right to rig the 2016 democratic primary is just the tip of the iceberg. If this goes to trial, America will see even more of the dark underbelly that is the Democrat election process. |
Five Pakistani Congressional Staffers In Criminal Probe Over Unauthorized Computer Access
Dozens of House Democrats have collectively paid $4 million since 2009 to Pakistani IT professionals now under criminal investigation who had access to House members’ email and computer files.
Five people employed by members of the House of Representatives remain under criminal investigation for unauthorized access to Congressional computers. Former DNC chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz employed at least one of those under investigation.
The criminal investigation into the five, which includes three brothers and a wife of one of the men, started late last year, as reported by Politico in February. The group is being investigated by US Capitol Police over allegations that they removed equipment from over 20 members’ offices, as well as having run a procurement scheme to buy equipment and then overcharge the House.
House Speaker Paul Ryan said last week Capitol Police are receiving additional help for the investigation. “I won’t speak to the nature of their investigation, but they’re getting the kind of technical assistance they need to do that, this is under an active criminal investigation, their capabilities are pretty strong but they’re also able to go and get the kind of help they need from other sources,” Ryan said.
The brothers, Abid, Jamal and Imran Awan, worked as shared employees for various members of the House, covering committees relating to intelligence, terrorism and cybersecurity, which included the House Committee on Foreign Affairs, the Committee on Homeland Security and the Subcommittee on Tactical Air and Land Forces of the Armed Services Committee.
Imran’s wife, Hina Alvi, and Rao Abbas, both of whom worked as House IT employees, are also under investigation.
Debbie Wasserman Schultz
The group were banned from accessing the computers as a result of the investigation but, as of earlier this month, Imran Awan remains as an “technology adviser” to former Democratic National Committee chair, Debbie Wasserman Schultz, who was forced to resign in July following revelations that she worked to further Hillary Clinton’s chances of winning the Democratic primary at the expense of Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders.
News of the brothers’ investigation has sparked speculation that it may be tied to the hack of the DNC servers, the contents of which were first released by Guccifer 2.0 and later published on WikiLeaks.
Russian actors have been accused of being behind the hack, which Democrats claim contributed to Clinton’s loss to Donald Trump. There have also been reports that the DNC hack came from an insider.
@Cernovich Can’t blame the Russians for Awan brothers, why is no one talking about them since were investigating leaks!
— JCross (@ccross5882) March 21, 2017
@Cernovich Were Dems really hacked? Looks like they’ll give just about anybody access to their computers. No ? asked.
— Sr Admin Official (@Im_Effin_Dunn) March 20, 2017
@TomFitton What is the actual proof specifically that in fact it was Russia doing hack of DNC because Awan Brothers issue disturbs me
— Cheryl Aschenbrenner (@CherylAschenbr2) March 21, 2017
An email between DNC staffers in April 2016, which was released by WikiLeaks, references a staff member named Imran and how this person has access to the passwords for Wasserman Schultz’s iPad.
Garret Bonosky, deputy director of office of the DNC chair, tells Amy Kroll: “I have to get [this iPad] thing figured out. Need to make sure I have her username and password before I delete and reload the app.”
“I do not have access to her ipad password, but Imran does,” Kroll replies, later writing: “Just spoke to Imran, call me whenever GB and I’ll update you, don’t delete anything yet.”
Another email from the DNC hack, dated December 2016, references Imran once again. Wasserman Schultz’s assistant Rosalyn Kumar tells scheduler Anna Stolitzka: “[Nancy] Pelosi is doing [a] closed door meeting. No staff or anyone allowed. Kaitlyn come to Rayburn room and get her iPad for Imran.”
6-Figure Salaries
The brothers were paid high salaries for their work with various House members, above the median salary for Congressional staffers.
Imran, who started working for Wasserman Schultz in 2005, received $164,600 in 2016, with close to $20,000 of that coming from Wasserman Schultz.
Jamal, who started working as a staffer in 2014, was paid $157,350.12 in 2016.
Abid, who started working in 2005, was paid $160,943 in 2016.
Hina Alvi, who was employed as a staffer from February 2007, was paid 168,300 in 2016.
Rao Abbas was paid $85,049 in 2016.
The Daily Caller reports that Imran received $1.2 million in salary since 2010, while Abid and Alvi received over $1 million each.
House Democrats supporting the employees have suggested that the Pakistani nationality of the suspects may have inspired the investigation.
Democrats Fabricated “Russia Hacked The DNC” To Justify Spying On Trump
They started setting Trump up as soon as the primaries were over.
The FISA request to spy on Trump was originally filed in June 2016. The Wikileaks of the DNC hacked emails were released July 22, 2016. The entire “Russia hacked the DNC” story was created to justify DNC spying on Trump before the election.
Look at the timeline:
May 26, Trump reaches enough delegates to unofficially win Republican Presidential nomination.
June 2016, FISA request rejected against Trump.
July 22, 2016 Wikileaks releases the emails against the DNC.
August 2016, DNC claims the emails are Russian propaganda and some are fake with the goal of harming Hillary Clinton’s Presidency.
The media runs with this story, this creates suspicion against Trump to suggest that Russia is trying to influence the election.
October a month before the election, another FISA request is accepted. This time because of “probable cause” no evidence actually needing to be required.
This allows the current federal government to spy on a Presidential candidate a month before the election, one who is a part of the opposing political party ( while Obama himself is actively campaigning with Hillary and the DOJ is working to help Hillary pass her investigation with no issues ).
The plan the Democrats had for the election was to rig it for Hillary by using dirty tactics by the Mainstream Media to destroy Bernie’s chance and to make Trump look bad, and also to potentially spy on him to find negative stories to run in the month lead up to the election. They were probably hoping to leak audio clips of Trump having private conversations saying politically incorrect things, like how they had the hot mic tape of him saying “grab her by the pussy” and used that to find 15+ random women to claim that he sexually assaulted them a few weeks before the election.
A more comprehensive timeline put together by a user a Reddit:
Obama creates office of Chief Technology Officer – Aneesh Chopra ties to Tim Kaine/Terry McAuliffe (DNC Virginia strategy), Todd Park (Healthcare.gov fiasco), Megan Smith (VP Google X)
10 Oct 2012 – Directive 19 (Protect whistleblowers just before election – failsafe?)
==2013== New term. Uranium One, wiretapping (journalists/Merkel/France), slush fund projects, BLM, ISIS rebranded / Syria mobilization, Euromaidan (Ukraine)
2014 – Fancy Bear attacks Germany, Ukraine. (coincidence?)
19 Mar 2015 – Obama appoints David Recordon (Facebook) as White House IT director.
8 April 2015 – Fancy Bear (ISIS fakeout) attacks France. (coincidence?)
16 June 2015 – Trump enters presidential race.
?? June 2016 – FISA request – denied.
7 June 2016 – Final GOP primary.
14 June 2016 – Reported that DNC servers hacked (after “one year” – coincides with Trump entering race – setup begins). Research dossier on Trump stolen, Hillary campaign data untouched. Peskov denies Russian interference.
15 June 2016 – CrowdStrike (Russian expat Dmitri Alperovitch ties to Atlantic Council) blames Fancy Bear(coincidence?)
6 Jul 2016 – Senate bill to revoke Hillary security clearance.
11 Jul 2016 – House bill to revoke Hillary security clearance.
22 Jul 2016 – Wikileaks – Hillary.
7 Oct 2016 – Wikileaks – Podesta. Press release.
9 Oct 2016 – Trump campaign alleges Clinton ties to Russia.
12 Oct 2016 – Putin denies hacking.
15 Oct 2016 – FISA warrant issued.
19 Oct 2016 – Hillary calls Trump a puppet at final presidential debate. (Civilian – who is leaking her information?)
20 Oct 2016 – Esquire details hacking operation.
31 Oct 2016 – FBI: No direct link to Trump.
24 Nov 2016 – Scary Russian trolls! (CTR/Shareblue?)
10 Jan 2017 – Trump intelligence allegations dossier “leaked”. (Dates curious – reports follow damaging press – retaliation?)
11 Jan 2017 – Clapper denies dossier came from IC.
12 Jan 2017 – Obama modifies E.O. 12333. (Another fail-safe?)
Isn’t it amazing how quickly the Mainstream Media ran and accepted the Russian narrative? Almost like they were fed orders for it and didn’t care how no connection to Russia existed.
Previously:
Loretta Lynch’s Final Order Allows The NSA To Give Spying Data To Other Federal Agencies
Hillary Set Up The ‘Russian Hack’ Excuse During The Debates
In 2013 Obama Legalized The Use Of Propaganda On The US Public
Load More