Barack Hussein Obama Archives - Page 9 of 973

In the whirlwind of the 2020 presidential election, one number that echoes louder than most is 81 million votes cast for Joe Biden. However, a closer examination of the data raises eyebrows and invites us to question the legitimacy of this impressive figure. Let’s delve into the improbability of Biden’s purported 81 million votes by dissecting the bellwether data, scrutinizing Biden’s primary performance, and comparing it to historical precedents set by other presidents like Trump and Obama.

Bellwether Blues: Dissecting Voting Trends in 19 Key Counties

In the realm of election dynamics, the concept of bellwether counties plays a pivotal role. These counties, historically renowned for mirroring the national sentiment, have served as reliable indicators of presidential outcomes since 1980. However, the 2020 election introduced a surprising twist, particularly when we scrutinize the voting trends in 19 key bellwether counties.

Traditionally, these 19 counties have been a reliable compass for predicting the overall election outcome. In 2016, for instance, Donald Trump secured victory in 16 out of the 19 bellwether counties, foreshadowing his triumph in the general election. Fast-forward to 2020, and the script takes an unexpected turn.

In the latest election, Trump managed to win 18 out of the 19 bellwether counties, solidifying his hold on these historically significant areas. This raises a compelling question: If these bellwether counties have consistently reflected the national mood in the past, how did Biden manage to secure a victory despite faltering in the very counties that have traditionally foreshadowed success?

Comparing this to historical data, Barack Obama’s performance in 2012 is noteworthy. He won 17 out of the 19 bellwether counties, aligning with the predictive nature of these areas. The stark contrast between Obama’s success in bellwether counties and Biden’s less convincing performance in the same territories further fuels the skepticism surrounding the 2020 election results.

The intricate dance of numbers in these bellwether counties offers a compelling narrative. Trump’s dominance in these areas in both 2016 and 2020, coupled with Obama’s previous success, challenges the conventional wisdom that these counties accurately reflect the national sentiment. The improbable outcome of Biden’s victory despite faltering in the bellwether counties prompts us to delve deeper into the intricacies of voting trends and question the reliability of these historical indicators.

Lackluster Primary Performance: A Sign of Weakness

Digging deeper into Biden’s journey to the presidency, his lackluster performance in the Democratic primary raises eyebrows. Historically, candidates who struggle in the primary elections face an uphill battle in the general election. Biden’s unimpressive showings in early contests, particularly in Iowa and New Hampshire, should have been a red flag.

The improbable leap from a tepid primary performance to a record-breaking 81 million votes demands scrutiny. Were these votes truly a testament to widespread enthusiasm for Biden, or does the data suggest a more nuanced narrative? Examining the primary results as a precursor to the general election sheds light on the improbability of the final vote count.

Trump’s 76 Million: Setting a Record

In the same arena, it’s crucial to acknowledge the unprecedented 76 million votes garnered by Donald Trump. Trump’s numbers represent the highest vote count for a sitting president in history. The juxtaposition of Trump’s record-breaking achievement with Biden’s 81 million poses a conundrum.

One must question the likelihood of Biden surpassing Trump’s impressive turnout, especially given the historical context. Trump’s ability to rally his base and secure such a significant number of votes creates a challenging benchmark for Biden’s numbers to match. The improbable gap between the two figures demands a closer examination of the factors at play.

Conclusion: Unraveling the Improbable

In the intricate landscape of the 2020 election, the figure 81 million stands out as a puzzle that beckons scrutiny. A closer examination of bellwether data, primary performance, and the staggering contrast with Trump’s record-breaking turnout reveals a complex narrative that challenges the mainstream narrative.

As we navigate the labyrinth of numbers and trends, skepticism emerges not just in the statistics but in the broader arena of media discourse. The mainstream media’s uncritical acceptance of the 81 million vote count without thorough investigation raises eyebrows. The apparent lack of scrutiny and the uniform parroting of “The Big Lie” narrative whenever Trump questions the validity of the results create an atmosphere of suspicion.

The media’s role in shaping public perception is profound, yet the apparent reluctance to delve into the nuances of the 81 million votes raises questions about the thoroughness of the election coverage. In a healthy democracy, skepticism is a crucial tool for ensuring transparency and accountability. The hesitancy to apply this skepticism uniformly, especially when confronted with challenges to the narrative, underscores the need for a more nuanced exploration of the events surrounding the 2020 election.

In unraveling the improbable nature of 81 million votes cast for Joe Biden, it becomes evident that the narrative extends beyond statistical analysis. It encompasses a critical evaluation of media responsibility and the importance of fostering a climate where questions are met with rigorous investigation rather than dismissal. As we grapple with the complexities of this historic election, the call for a comprehensive, unbiased examination echoes louder than ever.

Featured Political View Point

Before You Vote

November 22, 2023 gags

Before you vote. Go grocery shopping, gas up your car, pay your bills, look at your 401k. Then vote.

Conspiracy Featured Political

The Mystery of Obama’s Social Security Number

November 18, 2023November 17, 2023 gags

Obama’s Social Security Number starts with 042. This may seem like a trivial detail, but it actually raises some serious questions about his identity and eligibility to be president. In this article, I will explain why this is a problem and what it means for our country and our future.

How Social Security Numbers Work

Social Security numbers are issued by the Social Security Administration (SSA) based on the state where the applicant lives or requests the card be mailed to. The first three digits of the number, called the area number, indicate the geographic region of the applicant. For example, numbers starting with 001 to 003 are assigned to New Hampshire, while numbers starting with 600 to 626 are assigned to Arizona.

The SSA has a list of all the area numbers and their corresponding states on its website. You can check it yourself and see that area number 042 is assigned to Connecticut, a state in the northeastern region of the US.

Why Obama’s Number is Suspicious

Obama was born in Hawaii, a state in the Pacific Ocean, and he never lived in or had any associations with Connecticut. So how did he get a Connecticut-based Social Security number?

This is not a conspiracy theory or a hoax. This is a fact that can be verified by anyone who has access to the SSA’s database or the public records of Obama’s life. In fact, several private investigators and researchers have done so and found some disturbing anomalies.

The Case of John Paul Ludwig

One of them is Susan Daniels, a licensed private investigator from Ohio who has been investigating Obama’s Social Security number since 2009. She discovered that the number Obama is using, 042-68-4425, was issued in March 1977, when Obama was 15 years old and living in Hawaii. She also found out that the number was originally assigned to an elderly man named John Paul Ludwig, who was born in 1890 in France and immigrated to the US in 1924. Ludwig died in Hawaii in 1981, but his death was either never reported to the SSA or deleted from the database by someone.

Daniels claims that Obama’s grandmother, Madelyn Dunham, who worked as a volunteer in the probate office in the Honolulu courthouse, had access to Ludwig’s estate files and stole his Social Security number for her grandson. She says that this was done to conceal Obama’s foreign birth and make him eligible for federal benefits and programs.

The Multiple Identities of Obama

Another investigator is Neil Sankey, a former British police officer who now works as a private detective in California. He compiled a list of 49 Social Security numbers and 16 different names that are associated with Obama in various databases. He says that this indicates a pattern of identity fraud and manipulation.

Sankey also found that Obama used a different Social Security number, 364-01-9662, when he registered for the selective service in 1980. This number was issued in Michigan, another state where Obama never lived. Sankey says that this shows that Obama was trying to avoid being tracked by the SSA and the IRS.

The Implications and Consequences

These findings are not only shocking but also illegal. According to federal law, it is a crime to use a false or stolen Social Security number or to use more than one number. The penalty for such offenses can range from a fine of up to $250,000 to imprisonment for up to five years or deportation for non-citizens.

So why hasn’t Obama been held accountable for these violations? Why hasn’t the media investigated this issue and exposed the truth? Why hasn’t Congress or the courts challenged Obama’s eligibility and demanded to see his original birth certificate and other documents?

The answer is simple: because they are afraid of the consequences. They are afraid of being labeled as racists, birthers, or conspiracy theorists. They are afraid of losing their jobs, their reputations, or their lives. Not only that, but they are afraid of facing the wrath of the powerful forces that are behind Obama and his agenda.

But we, the people, should not be afraid. We should not let our rights and freedoms be trampled on by a fraud and a usurper. We should demand the truth and justice. Likewise, we should expose the mystery of Obama’s Social Security number and reveal his true identity and history.

We should do it for ourselves, for our country, and for our future.

Featured Political View Point

Trump Isn’t Running Against Biden

November 3, 2023November 3, 2023 gags

Trump isn’t running against Biden – he’s running against The Clinton’s, Obama’s, CNN, MSN, NBC, ABC, CBS, NPR, Soros, BLM, ANTIFA, etc…

It’s Trump vs. Satan and his minions.

Conspiracy Featured Political

The Hidden Economy of Corrupt Politicians: Money Laundering Exposed

November 1, 2023October 31, 2023 gags

There’s a term in politics that often lurks in the shadows, whispered in hushed tones: money laundering. It’s a concept that, while sounding complex, can be broken down into simpler terms for you to understand. Money laundering isn’t just something from a gangster movie – it happens in the world of politics too. In this article, we’ll explore the art of political money laundering, demystifying the process and shining a light on the methods corrupt politicians use in funneling ill-gotten gains back to themselves.

The Basics: What is Money Laundering?

Money laundering is like a magic trick that makes dirty money look clean. Imagine a criminal wants to buy a fancy car with the cash they earned from illegal activities. They can’t just waltz into the dealership with a briefcase full of cash, right? That’s where money laundering comes into play. It’s the process of making that dirty money seem legit, like it was earned through legal means.

Shell Companies: A Corrupt Politician’s Best Friend

One of the favorite tools in a politician’s arsenal is the creation of shell companies. These are companies that exist on paper but don’t do much real business. The trick is to hide the origin of the money by funneling it through these entities. Imagine having a secret bank account that nobody knows about – a shell company is like that, but on a grander scale.

Politicians often set up these shell companies in tax havens or places with lax financial regulations. These offshore accounts provide an added layer of secrecy, making it difficult for authorities to trace the money back to its source.

Real Estate Shenanigans

Have you ever wondered how a corrupt politician with a modest salary ends up owning luxurious mansions and properties? Real estate is a popular destination for laundered money. Here’s how it works:

Corrupt politicians might purchase properties using illicit funds through shell companies or intermediaries. Once they own these properties, they can either sell them for a hefty profit, generating clean money, or use the properties as collateral for loans. The borrowed money then appears to be a legitimate income source.

The Casino Caper

Another trick up their sleeves is to launder money through casinos. Here’s the scoop: a politician walks into a casino with a bag full of dirty cash and converts it into chips. They can then play a few hands, lose some chips, and cash out the rest. The money they receive in return appears to be winnings from gambling – a seemingly clean source of income.

Cryptocurrency: The New Frontier

As technology advances, so do the methods of money laundering. Cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin offer politicians a new avenue to launder their ill-gotten gains. It’s like digital cash that can be moved around the world with relative ease and anonymity.

They might buy cryptocurrencies using dirty money, and then trade or transfer them to other accounts. With some digital sleight of hand, the money can be made to look clean. It’s a challenge for law enforcement agencies to trace these transactions due to the decentralized nature of cryptocurrencies.

Smurfing and Structuring: The Money Laundering Twins

Smurfing and structuring are like two sides of the same coin when it comes to money laundering. Politicians employ these techniques to fly under the radar and avoid suspicion.

Smurfing involves breaking down large sums of money into smaller, less noticeable transactions. Imagine if you had $50,000 in dirty cash – instead of depositing it all at once, you’d make multiple smaller deposits, like $5,000 each, in different accounts. This makes it less likely to trigger alarm bells at the bank.

Structuring is the flip side. It’s about keeping deposits under a certain threshold to avoid raising suspicion. For example, if a dirty career politician wants to launder $100,000, they might make ten separate deposits of $9,000 each to avoid hitting the $10,000 reporting limit.

The Importance of Offshore Accounts

Offshore bank accounts are like secret treasure chests for these politicians. They use these accounts to stash their dirty money away from prying eyes. The laws and regulations in some countries make it challenging for authorities to access information about offshore accounts, allowing the corrupt to operate in secrecy.

Political Campaigns: A Convenient Cover

Ever wondered why some politicians pour an incredible amount of their own money into their campaigns? It’s not just a show of support; it can be a way to launder money. Here’s how it works:

A politician injects their dirty money into their election campaign fund, and then, like magic, the money is clean. Donations to political campaigns are heavily regulated, but this technique allows them to legitimize their ill-gotten gains.

Book Deals: The Written Cover-Up

Now, let’s talk about a relatively new and trendy method of money laundering among politicians – book deals. Politicians author books and secure hefty advances from publishing houses. While this may seem like a legitimate endeavor, it can also serve as a convenient cover to launder money.

Here’s how it works: A corrupt politician writes a book or hires someone to ghostwrite it. A publishing house offers them a substantial advance – a large sum of money upfront. This money may come from legitimate book sales, but it can also serve as a way to legitimize dirty funds. The book can be sold, or even given away, to supporters and organizations associated with the politician, effectively returning the money to the corrupt author in a seemingly legal manner.

Foreign Aid: The Unaudited Path

In the intricate world of political money laundering, foreign aid often becomes a shadowy conduit for politicians to further their illicit schemes. Recent events, notably involving unaudited funds sent to Ukraine, shed light on this covert avenue that allows politicians to exploit financial aid intended for nations in need.

Ukraine’s Mysterious Funds: The Unseen Trail

The tale of unaudited money sent to Ukraine is one that highlights the dark side of foreign aid. Funds allocated for humanitarian aid and national development are meant to uplift struggling nations. However, when those funds are sent without proper oversight and auditing, they become a playground for corruption.

In this context, politicians can exploit the lack of accountability and transparency to divert foreign aid into their personal coffers. It’s like a magician’s trick; they move the money from one pocket to another, making it disappear from the public’s view.

The Consequences of Misused Aid

When foreign aid is misappropriated or siphoned off through unaudited channels, the intended beneficiaries suffer the most. Funds that should be dedicated to infrastructure, healthcare, and education are instead used for personal gain or concealed in offshore accounts.

This misuse erodes trust in the system and jeopardizes the lives of those who depend on foreign aid for their survival and well-being. It’s a betrayal of the trust placed in politicians to act in the best interests of their countries and the international community.

The Need for Oversight

The case of unaudited money sent to Ukraine underscores the importance of robust oversight and transparency in foreign aid distribution. It’s a call to action for governments and international organizations to ensure that aid reaches its intended recipients and is used for its designated purpose.

In an age where technology and information can provide real-time tracking of financial transactions, there is no excuse for funds to go unaudited and unaccounted for. We must demand accountability from our “representatives” to ensure that foreign aid serves its true purpose: helping those in need.

Conclusion

Corrupt politicians employ a shadowy arsenal of clever tricks and techniques to launder their ill-gotten money. While this may seem like a tale out of a thriller movie, it’s a stark reality that casts a long, dark shadow over the political landscape. Understanding these methods is crucial, as it reveals the sinister underbelly of corruption and how it infiltrates our most trusted institutions.

The fight against political money laundering is an ongoing battle, often waged in the shadows. Transparency and diligence are our best tools, but the darkness of greed and deception perpetually threatens to engulf the light of accountability. As we unveil these intricate webs of deceit, we must remain vigilant, for it is in the dark corners of corruption that the true extent of its damage becomes horrifyingly clear.

Tag: Barack Hussein Obama

Debunking the 81 Million Votes Cast for Joe Biden