Dec 182016
 

What's Really Going On In Syria?

What’s really happening in Syria? Hint: Barack Hussein Obama, Hillary Clinton, John Kerry and the Mainstream Media have been lying to us.

Eva Bartlett is an independent journalist from Canada. She has traveled to Syria many times to investigate human rights violations and terrorism against Syrians. What she has found out is a truth completely opposite of what the Mainstream Media and governments claim, i.e. “Fake News”.

During a United Nations press conference, Bartlett sharply criticized Western governments, particularly the United States, for their efforts to effect regime change in Syria. Contrary to the Western narrative, she said, the people of Syria do not want a regime change. During her travels to and around the country, she had talked to Syrians, who widely expressed support for President Bashar al-Assad, whose army is battling a number of Western-backed terrorist groups.

Watch the video below to hear the true about what is really going on in Syria.

(NSFW Language)

[arve url=”https://youtu.be/Z9F-cHc5Qog” /]

This is what a real journalist looks like. You forget that living here in the US!

Western mainstream media’s coverage of the Syrian war is “compromised” as their local sources are “not credible” and, in the case of Aleppo, not even there, a Canadian journalist said in an emotional speech at the UN.

“I’ve been many times to Homs, to Maaloula, to Latakia and Tartus [in Syria] and again, Aleppo, four times. And people’s support of their government is absolutely true. Whatever you hear in the corporate media is completely opposite,” Eva Bartlett, a Canadian journalist and rights activist, told a press conference arranged by the Syrian mission to the UN.

“And, on that note, what you hear in the corporate media, and I will name them – BBC, Guardian, the New York Times etc. – on Aleppo is also the opposite of reality,” she added. The mainstream media narrative, she argued, is meant to mislead the public about what is really happening in Syria by demonizing President Bashar Assad’s government and altering the facts on Russia’s support for Damascus.

Bartlett’s statements did not seemingly play well with everyone in the room. A reporter from Aftenposten, Norway’s largest print newspaper, challenged her and demanded Bartlett explain what she thought was the “agenda” of Western mainstream media. “Why should we lie, why the international organizations on the ground should lie? How can you justify calling all of us liars?” he said.

Bartlett, who has been covering Syrian events for several years since the outbreak of the civil war, noted that while there are “certainly honest journalists among the very compromised establishment media,” many respected media agencies simply seem to avoid doing a fact-check.

She then asked her Norwegian colleague to name humanitarian organizations operating in eastern Aleppo. As the Aftenposten reporter stayed silent, Bartlett added that “there are none.”

“These organizations are relying on the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights [SOHR], which is based in Coventry, UK, which is one man. They’re relying on compromised groups like the White Helmets. Let’s talk about the White Helmets,” she went on.

Members of the controversial group “purport to be rescuing civilians in eastern Aleppo and Idlib … no one in eastern Aleppo has heard of them.” Meanwhile, she noted, “their video footage actually contains children that have been ‘recycled’ in different reports; so you can find a girl named Aya who turns up in a report in say August, and she turns up in the next month in two different locations.”

“So they [the White Helmets] are not credible. The SOHR are not credible. ‘Unnamed activists’ are not credible. Once or twice maybe, but every time? Not credible. So your sources on the ground – you don’t have them,” Bartlett concluded.

A journalist from Italian newspaper Corriere della Sera took a more measured tone and asked Bartlett to explain the difference between the Western and Russian media coverage, saying that Russian television channels report on humanitarian efforts and reconciliation instead of overt naming and blaming.

“You ask why we aren’t seeing this,” Bartlett said. “This relates to the other gentleman’s question about why most of the corporate media are telling lies about Syria. It’s because this is the agenda; if they had told the truth about Syria from the beginning, we wouldn’t be here now. We wouldn’t have seen so many people killed.”

Source…

Unedited video:

[arve url=”https://youtu.be/g1VNQGsiP8M” /]

Not only has Trump’s victory turned America around (it’s certain, even though he’s not in office yet), but Syrians can finally have their home, neighborhood, city, and country back.

Here are some updates from the Aleppo liberation from the Obama/Hillary/Kerry-backed ISIS terrorists. Residents are overjoyed.

If this is true, it’s is CHILLING! It means that all the Syrian refugees coming here and migrating throughout Europe are being dispersed for a reason. Can you say Trojan Horse?

 

Germany Tried To Influence The Election In Favor Of Hillary

 Political  Comments Off on Germany Tried To Influence The Election In Favor Of Hillary
Dec 172016
 

Germany Tried To Influence The Election In Favor Of Hillary

Germany funded the Clinton Campaign and therefore acted as an external influence during the Election.

Angela Merkel has been caught funneling up to $5 million of German taxpayers money to the Clinton Foundation in an underhanded effort to try to influence the U.S. Election.

Between July and September 2016, Merkel gave millions of German taxpayers money to the Clinton Foundation, according to German newspaper Die Welt.

In the latest list of donors published on the Clinton Foundation website, the name of Germany’s Federal Ministry for the Environment (BMU) appears among those which gave between $1 million and $5 million.

Germany Influence Election - Germany Tried To Influence The Election In Favor Of Hillary

The Federal Ministry for the Environment (BMU) transferred the money to the Clinton Foundation in the third quarter of 2016, at the height of Clinton’s campaign.

The German government has some explaining to do for the donation. Why would a Federal German Ministry support the election campaign of a U.S. presidential candidate? It seems German taxpayers unwittingly financed Hillary Clinton’s election campaign.

 

Obama Birth Certificate Was Faked In Adobe Illustrator (PROOF)

 Political  Comments Off on Obama Birth Certificate Was Faked In Adobe Illustrator (PROOF)
Dec 162016
 

Obama Birth Certificate was Faked In Adobe Illustrator (PROOF)

Sheriff Joe Arpaio is right. Obama’s birth certificate has been “Fake News” all along.

The fake certificate was created in Adobe Illustrator by someone who forgot to flatten the document.

Check out this video:

[arve url=”https://commonsenseevaluation.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/Obama-Birth-Certificate-was-Faked-In-Adobe-Illustrator-PROOF-6f0_1304406608.mp4″ /]

 

Here is the original the press release: President Obama’s Long Form Birth Certificate

Download the official birth certificate PDF here.

Open the document in Adobe Illustrator.

In Adobe Illustrator, make sure in “Window” the “Layers” box is checked.

In the “Layers” box (bottom right by default) you can go through the countless separate layer pieces one by one. (You can do this because the document was created using Adobe Illustrator, and the person who created the final PDF left the Adobe Illustrator Layers and Editing capabilities box checked).

Un-check the eyeball on the left of each layer to hide individual pieces.

Zoom in and see how digital pieces were added on top of it with no anti-aliasing (that would have somewhat covered the trickery. It would have smoothed the edges out).

Notice that some pieces are scans of a real document. Others were added via a digital source. Either way, both are added to the document after scanning.

Scanned documents cannot have multiple layers. They are flat 1 layer documents.

There are programs that can vectorize text etc, but they do not create that many different layers, nor do they overlay pieces all over each other of different opacity and anti-aliasing attributes. Even if that was the case, they White House claims it was a “scanned” document and not edited.

This document is heavily edited, that is unquestionable. However one can only wonder why it was edited in such a poor and traceable manner. Was this task given to the most unskilled graphic designer on Obama’s payroll, or was this done with the intent of destroying Obama’s credibility?

Please pass this on, especially if you know a graphic designer. If they don’t believe you, tell them to examine it for themselves. Then watch their mouth drop!

More evidence:

When the PDF file given from WhiteHouse.gov is opened in Adobe Illustrator it shows up in different layers.

[arve url=”https://commonsenseevaluation.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/President-Obamas-Birth-Certificate-PDF-has-Layers.mp4″ /]

Update:

Something to ponder!