Guns Sales Up After Obama Win

Obama is already stimulating the economy with tons of new gun sales before he even takes office. I guess people feel the need to buy guns to ensure a democratic society.

Just a reminder:


On Concerns Over Gun Control, Gun Sales Are Up


Sales of handguns, rifles and ammunition have surged in the last week, according to gun store owners around the nation who describe a wave of buyers concerned that an Obama administration will curtail their right to bear arms.

“He’s a gun-snatcher,” said Jim Pruett, owner of Jim Pruett’s Guns and Ammo in northwest Houston, which was packed with shoppers on Thursday.

“He wants to take our guns from us and create a socialist society policed by his own police force,” added Mr. Pruett, a former radio personality, of President-elect Barack Obama.

Mr. Pruett said that sales last Saturday, just before Election Day, ran about seven times higher than a typical good Saturday.

A spot check by reporters in four other states easily found Mr. Pruett’s comments echoed from both sides of the counter.

David Nelson, a co-owner of Montana Ordnance & Supply in Missoula, Mont., said his buyers were “awake and aware and see a dangerous trend.”

Mr. Nelson said sales at his store had risen about 30 percent since Mr. Obama declared his candidacy. “People are concerned about overreaching legislation from Washington,” he said. “They are educating themselves on the Internet.”

In Colorado, would-be gun buyers set a one-day record last Saturday with the highest number of background check requests in a 24-hour period, according to figures from the Colorado Bureau of Investigation.

“We’re not really sure who is promoting the concept that a change in federal administrations might affect firearms possession rights,” said an agency spokesman, Lance Clem, “but we do know that it’s increased business considerably.”

Federal law-enforcement officials cautioned that gun sales were extremely volatile. Nationally, rifle and handgun sales surged 17 percent, for example, in May, compared with May 2007, according to Federal Bureau of Investigation figures. That was before Mr. Obama had clinched the Democratic nomination. Sales then fell and were essentially flat by September compared with the year before, even as the campaign heated up, before rising 14 percent in October. November figures were not yet available.

What is clear is that every gun seller — not to mention every advocacy group for gun ownership that depends on dues-paying members — has an incentive to stoke the concern that can prompt a gun sale. Political uncertainty, gun dealers say, is great for business.

“Clinton was the best gun salesman the gun manufacturers ever had,” said Rick Gray, owner of the Accuracy Gun Shop in Las Vegas. “Obama’s going to be right up there with him.”

Sales at his shop doubled on Wednesday, Mr. Gray said, to more than 20 guns from three to 10 on a typical day.

Asked if that made him root for Democratic candidates, Mr. Gray said no. “It’s not all about profits; it’s about what’s he going to do for the country,” he said, noting that he had supported Senator John McCain, who was the Republican nominee.

A National Rifle Association spokesman, Wayne LaPierre, dismissed the notion that the group had any incentive to increase gun sales or membership. “Ridiculous,” Mr. LaPierre said. “I hope President-elect Obama keeps his promises and protects gun rights. If he does that, we’ll be cheering.”

The political battle over guns raged fiercely throughout the campaign in many states where gun ownership is common. On Monday, the day before the election, home-delivered copies of The Pittsburgh Post-Gazette arrived in plastic bags that said, “Vote Freedom First” and “Defend Freedom — Defeat Obama.” The bags were paid for by the N.R.A., whose initials were printed on each one.

Democrats fired back all over the country, with mail campaigns in many states with fliers stating flatly that as president, Mr. Obama would respect an individual’s right to own guns.

“Obama will protect our gun rights,” said one flier sent to homes in Minnesota.

In Montana, Gov. Brian Schweitzer, a Democrat, was photographed shooting his guns outdoors.

But some gun buyers and sellers never forgot, or forgave, Mr. Obama’s widely reported comment in April to a group in San Francisco that some Americans “cling to guns or religion” in times of adversity.

“It was an annoying comment, and it showed there’s a lot more to him,” said Mike Warner, 38, of Las Vegas, who was shopping for a gun there on Thursday.

Mr. Warner said he was an N.R.A. member and an owner of two guns but wanted at least one more.

Other people, even some shopping for guns, said they thought that some gun enthusiasts’ fears about Mr. Obama were unjustified. James Sykes, a gun collector who was shopping at the Gun Room in Lakewood, Colo., called the rush to buy guns “a lot of hysteria about very little.”

Mr. Sykes, who said he had voted mostly Republican in the past but supported Mr. Obama this year, said that issues like war and the global economic crisis were more pressing for him right now and that he imagined the same was true for Mr. Obama.

“My Second Amendment rights are unquestionably important to me, but so is feeding my family,” he said. “In reality, you won’t be able to afford to buy a gun if your job goes overseas.”

But markets, whether for guns or stocks and bonds, tend to move with their own internal dynamics even in — perhaps especially in — gloomy economic times.

Chris Casella, general manager of Federal Firearms Company in Oakdale, Pa., a suburb of Pittsburgh, said he had been fielding about 30 calls a day from people interested in buying assault-type rifles, especially semiautomatic weapons, often with magazines that could hold lots of ammunition.

“A lot of people are buying them as an investment,” Mr. Casella said. “Better than gold.”


The Night We Waved Goodbye to America… Our Last Best Hope on Earth

This is by far the best analysis of the election and its expected aftermath that I’ve read to date. Sometimes it takes the prospective of someone who is detached from a situation to really see the significance of an event.

As someone from Great Britain who has seen what political correctness, multiculturalism, and uncontrolled immigration can do to the moral compass of a country, Peter Hitchens seems uniquely qualified to discuss Obama’s election.

The night we waved goodbye to America… our last best hope on Earth


Anyone would think we had just elected a hip, skinny and youthful replacement for God, with a plan to modernise Heaven and Hell – or that at the very least John Lennon had come back from the dead.

The swooning frenzy over the choice of Barack Obama as President of the United States must be one of the most absurd waves of self-deception and swirling fantasy ever to sweep through an advanced civilisation. At least Mandela-worship – its nearest equivalent – is focused on a man who actually did something.

I really don’t see how the Obama devotees can ever in future mock the Moonies, the Scientologists or people who claim to have been abducted in flying saucers. This is a cult like the one which grew up around Princess Diana, bereft of reason and hostile to facts.

It already has all the signs of such a thing. The newspapers which recorded Obama’s victory have become valuable relics. You may buy Obama picture books and Obama calendars and if there isn’t yet a children’s picture version of his story, there soon will be.

Proper books, recording his sordid associates, his cowardly voting record, his astonishingly militant commitment to unrestricted abortion and his blundering trip to Africa, are little-read and hard to find.

If you can believe that this undistinguished and conventionally Left-wing machine politician is a sort of secular saviour, then you can believe anything. He plainly doesn’t believe it himself. His cliche-stuffed, PC clunker of an acceptance speech suffered badly from nerves. It was what you would expect from someone who knew he’d promised too much and that from now on the easy bit was over.

He needn’t worry too much. From now on, the rough boys and girls of America’s Democratic Party apparatus, many recycled from Bill Clinton’s stained and crumpled entourage, will crowd round him, to collect the rich spoils of his victory and also tell him what to do, which is what he is used to.

Just look at his sermon by the shores of Lake Michigan. He really did talk about a ‘new dawn’, and a ‘timeless creed’ (which was ‘yes, we can’). He proclaimed that ‘change has come’. He revealed that, despite having edited the Harvard Law Review, he doesn’t know what ‘enormity’ means. He reached depths of oratorical drivel never even plumbed by our own Mr Blair, burbling about putting our hands on the arc of history (or was it the ark of history?) and bending it once more toward the hope of a better day (Don’t try this at home).

I am not making this up. No wonder that awful old hack Jesse Jackson sobbed as he watched. How he must wish he, too, could get away with this sort of stuff.

And it was interesting how the President-elect failed to lift his admiring audience by repeated – but rather hesitant – invocations of the brainless slogan he was forced by his minders to adopt against his will – ‘Yes, we can’. They were supposed to thunder ‘Yes, we can!’ back at him, but they just wouldn’t join in. No wonder. Yes we can what exactly? Go home and keep a close eye on the tax rate, is my advice. He’d have been better off bursting into ‘I’d like to teach the world to sing in perfect harmony’ which contains roughly the same message and might have attracted some valuable commercial sponsorship.

Perhaps, being a Chicago crowd, they knew some of the things that 52.5 per cent of America prefers not to know. They know Obama is the obedient servant of one of the most squalid and unshakeable political machines in America. They know that one of his alarmingly close associates, a state-subsidised slum landlord called Tony Rezko, has been convicted on fraud and corruption charges.

They also know the US is just as segregated as it was before Martin Luther King – in schools, streets, neighbourhoods, holidays, even in its TV-watching habits and its choice of fast-food joint. The difference is that it is now done by unspoken agreement rather than by law.

If Mr Obama’s election had threatened any of that, his feel-good white supporters would have scuttled off and voted for John McCain, or practically anyone. But it doesn’t. Mr Obama, thanks mainly to the now-departed grandmother he alternately praised as a saint and denounced as a racial bigot, has the huge advantages of an expensive private education. He did not have to grow up in the badlands of useless schools, shattered families and gangs which are the lot of so many young black men of his generation.

If the nonsensical claims made for this election were true, then every positive discrimination programme aimed at helping black people into jobs they otherwise wouldn’t get should be abandoned forthwith. Nothing of the kind will happen. On the contrary, there will probably be more of them.

And if those who voted for Obama were all proving their anti-racist nobility, that presumably means that those many millions who didn’t vote for him were proving themselves to be hopeless bigots. This is obviously untrue.

I was in Washington DC the night of the election. America’s beautiful capital has a sad secret. It is perhaps the most racially divided city in the world, with 15th Street – which runs due north from the White House – the unofficial frontier between black and white. But, like so much of America, it also now has a new division, and one which is in many ways much more important. I had attended an election-night party in a smart and liberal white area, but was staying the night less than a mile away on the edge of a suburb where Spanish is spoken as much as English, plus a smattering of tongues from such places as Ethiopia, Somalia and Afghanistan.

As I walked, I crossed another of Washington’s secret frontiers. There had been a few white people blowing car horns and shouting, as the result became clear. But among the Mexicans, Salvadorans and the other Third World nationalities, there was something like ecstasy.

They grasped the real significance of this moment. They knew it meant that America had finally switched sides in a global cultural war. Forget the Cold War, or even the Iraq War. The United States, having for the most part a deeply conservative people, had until now just about stood out against many of the mistakes which have ruined so much of the rest of the world.

Suspicious of welfare addiction, feeble justice and high taxes, totally committed to preserving its own national sovereignty, unabashedly Christian in a world part secular and part Muslim, suspicious of the Great Global Warming panic, it was unique.

These strengths had been fading for some time, mainly due to poorly controlled mass immigration and to the march of political correctness. They had also been weakened by the failure of America’s conservative party – the Republicans – to fight on the cultural and moral fronts.

They preferred to posture on the world stage. Scared of confronting Left-wing teachers and sexual revolutionaries at home, they could order soldiers to be brave on their behalf in far-off deserts. And now the US, like Britain before it, has begun the long slow descent into the Third World. How sad. Where now is our last best hope on Earth?


“USA!” “USA!” “USA!”


I’ve noticed that the crowds at McCain and Palin campaign stops shout “USA! USA!”, but the Democrats shout “0-bamm-a! 0-bamm-a!”. That says a lot to me. What mentality would you rather live under?

Hang in there people and don’t believe the polls, go out and vote and save our great country!

“USA!” “USA!” “USA!”


Wherever you are right now, stop and repeat this mantra: “USA!” “USA!” “USA!” Repeat it to your husband before he leaves for the office. Repeat it as your youngsters are bolting down their Cheerios. Repeat it to your mortgage-strapped neighbours and to the postman. Shout it from the rooftops and tell it to the world!

“USA!” “USA!” “USA!” In a sea of confusion complete with the stark reality of being backstabbed by your own mainstream media. Among all the demoralizing things raining down on your head, the most beautiful words on earth are: “USA!””USA!” “USA!”

Think of the violence of houses with `McCain for President’ being shot up. Think of bespectacled, middle-aged ladies attacked with the stick from a ‘McCain for President’ placard.

Think of the violence expected on Election Day, but wipe it out with the chant, “USA! “ “USA”! “USA!”

It’s 11 days on the last mile to the all-important November 4 election, and do you know where your country is?

It’s about to be hijacked by a would-be tinpot dictator posing as “Your Agent for Change”, loaded with good looks and guile-laced charm.

When you cut through the hype, that’s really all that Barack Hussein Obama is.

Sure it’s confusing with one talking head after another talking at you.

Of course you never thought that the editor down at your local newspaper would anoint himself a self-professed “progressive”. Who would ever dream that this “newsman” would climb right into the tank for Obama, then turn around and tell you it’s all over?

But leaving professionalism far behind them, so many mainstream media types ran after the `Pied Piper of Deceit’. Never strong in the first place, they are people who would sell out on America by choosing the path of least resistance.

Sure it’s demoralizing to know that NBC and MSNBC have joined ACORN and other Leftist groups for something called a “nonpartisan” effort at “Election Protection”.
Confusing?

You betcha!

But on the last mile home, don’t think shallow Katie Couric. Think positive. Think Sarah Palin.

They’re telling you that the current economic meltdown is the fault of Republicans like Senator John McCain.

No. It happened courtesy of the Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid Democrats.

Did you think that an economic meltdown coming mere weeks before Election Day was a coincidence?

Every time a nation gets swallowed up by Socialism/Marxism, economic disorder has come first!

Be like the Marxists and beat them at their own game: Keep your eye on the end game: the voting booth.

Remember the picture of Che Guvera prominently displayed in Obama’s office earlier this year? It was there. It wasn’t your imagination.

Where is Obama right now? In Hawaii. Whether he’s there to visit his ailing Granny or to bury birth certificates doesn’t matter. “The Messiah” waiting for Natural Order has left the arena–11 days before Nov. 4.

Like the sound of carpenters driving nails in your coffin in old Western movies, the hammers ring out in Chicago’s Grant Park for the multi-million dollar victory bash.
That’s how sure Obama is that ACORN has this election in the bag for him.

They’re bragging every day now that it’s over. But nothing’s changed. Obama and his ilk have been fomenting for change down where you couldn’t see them for decades. At the end of the day, they’ll still be down in the basement fomenting for change.

Jump out of the mental state of the endlessly yakking talking heads, saying McCain should be doing this or should be doing that.

This is not the time to second-guess the only antidote to Obama. This is the time to listen to Rush Limbaugh who says, “Don’t ever let anybody demoralize you.”
Why McCain?

Because he gets it. He gets the big picture.

McCain got it right when he said he looked into the eyes of Vladimir Putin and saw “KGB”.

Will the free world see KGB in Obama’s eyes AFTER he’s president?

Obama doesn’t have “the righteous wind” at his back, but the American people always had it.

Don’t let them kid you, it’s not over until the fat lady sings, and this time, you are the fat lady.

Legions of average people are writing to websites like Canada Free Press asking, “How do we stop him?”

It’s simple. The only way for No Obama is to vote for his opponent.

You can send Obama hobbling back to the drawing board and sideline him later where he works in public education with anti-American Bill Ayers.
Yes you can!

Don’t take a chance on future generations on Nov. 4, 2008.

Like El Rushbo says, “This is not the time to give up!”

Obama and his agents of change want to turn the USA over to a Socialist agenda, while you want “USA! “USA!” “USA!”

Go out and get it!


Load More