The human mind is a profound mystery that has baffled philosophers, scientists, and spiritual seekers for centuries. One of the most intriguing questions about our existence is whether consciousness is a product of our physical brain or something more. In recent decades, the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) has conducted research into altered states of consciousness through its Gateway Experience program. This program suggests that our consciousness is not a part of our body but rather an entity of its own.
The Gateway Experience: A Brief Overview
The Gateway Experience is a program developed by the Monroe Institute, a non-profit organization founded by Robert Monroe, an American businessman, and author who claimed to have experienced out-of-body experiences (OBEs). The program consists of a series of audiovisual exercises designed to induce altered states of consciousness, including OBEs, lucid dreaming, and deep meditation.
In the 1970s and 1980s, the CIA became interested in the Gateway Experience and its potential applications in the fields of espionage, mind control, and psychological warfare. They funded research into the program and even conducted experiments on their own personnel to explore its potential benefits.
What Does the Gateway Experience Teach Us About Consciousness?
The Gateway Experience’s core principle is that consciousness is not a product of the physical brain but rather an entity of its own. The program’s exercises aim to help participants separate their consciousness from their body, allowing them to explore different realms of existence and experience altered states of consciousness.
One of the most compelling aspects of the Gateway Experience is the consistent testimony of participants who report experiencing OBEs, lucid dreaming, and other altered states. These experiences suggest that our consciousness is not limited to our physical body and can exist independently of it.
The Nature of Consciousness: A Ghostly Being
The Gateway Experience’s findings align with the concept of a “ghost version” of ourselves. This idea posits that our consciousness is a separate entity from our physical body, stored in our brain but not considered a part of it. In this view, our consciousness is like a ghost, existing independently of our physical form and able to transcend the limitations of our body.
This idea has been explored in various spiritual and philosophical traditions throughout history. For example, in Hinduism, the concept of the “atman” (soul) is separate from the physical body, and upon death, it is believed to be reborn into another body. Similarly, in Plato’s theory of Forms, he posited that the physical world is merely a shadow of an ideal, perfect reality, and our consciousness is a part of this higher reality.
The Implications of a Ghostly Consciousness
If our consciousness is indeed a ghostly being, this has significant implications for our understanding of the human experience. It suggests that our physical body is merely a vessel for our consciousness, and upon death, our consciousness may continue to exist independently of our body.
This idea also raises questions about the nature of reality itself. If our consciousness can exist independently of our body, then what is the true nature of reality? Is it a physical construct, or is it a product of our consciousness?
Final Thoughts
The CIA’s “Gateway Experience” has provided compelling evidence that our consciousness is not a part of our body but rather an entity of its own. The program’s findings align with various spiritual and philosophical traditions that posit the existence of a separate, ghostly version of ourselves. If our consciousness is indeed a ghostly being, this has significant implications for our understanding of the human experience and the nature of reality itself.
The Gateway Experience offers a unique perspective on the nature of consciousness and provides a fascinating glimpse into the potential of altered states of consciousness. As we continue to explore the mysteries of the human mind, it is essential to consider the possibility that our consciousness is more than just a product of our physical brain.
For many people, cats are cherished companions and part of the family. They provide comfort, companionship, and endless entertainment. But have you ever wondered what might happen if you were to pass away and no one discovered your absence for weeks? Would your beloved feline friends resort to the unthinkable and devour your remains? In this article, we will look into this intriguing question, shedding light on the behavior of cats and their relationship with their human counterparts.
Understanding Feline Behavior
To comprehend whether cats would resort to consuming their deceased owners, we must first examine their natural instincts and behaviors. Cats are obligate carnivores, meaning their diet primarily consists of meat. They possess sharp teeth and claws that are designed for hunting small prey in the wild, such as birds and rodents. However, domesticated cats have become reliant on humans for sustenance and are typically provided with commercially available cat food.
Cats and Their Bond with Humans
Cats form strong bonds with their human caregivers, often displaying affectionate behaviors such as purring, kneading, and rubbing against their owners. These actions signify trust, companionship, and a sense of security. Cats rely on their owners for food, shelter, and emotional support, which strengthens their bond over time.
The Role of Smell and Perception
When a person passes away, their body goes through a process called decomposition. During this process, the body releases various chemical compounds, resulting in a distinct odor. Cats have an acute sense of smell, and they can detect odors that are imperceptible to humans. It is conceivable that cats may detect the scent of decomposition and be aware that something has changed.
Cats as Opportunistic Eaters
While cats are carnivorous, they are also opportunistic eaters. This means that if presented with the opportunity, they may consume food that is readily available, including the remains of a deceased owner. However, it is important to note that cats are not scavengers by nature. Unlike some other animals, cats do not possess the same instinctual drive to consume a dead body. Their natural hunting behavior is focused on capturing live prey.
The Unpredictability of Individual Cats
Just as humans have unique personalities, so do cats. Each cat possesses its own temperament, preferences, and behaviors. Some cats may exhibit more predatory tendencies, while others may be more docile and reliant on their human caregivers. It is challenging to predict with certainty how an individual cat would behave in the absence of its owner for an extended period.
The Importance of Timely Discovery
In the scenario where a cat owner passes away and goes unnoticed for weeks, the outcome may vary depending on several factors. If the cats still have access to food and water, their survival instincts will likely ensure their well-being until someone discovers the situation. However, without proper care and attention, their health may deteriorate over time.
Conclusion
While the idea of cats devouring their deceased owners may seem like the stuff of horror movies or urban legends, the reality is more nuanced. If faced with starvation, cats may consume their deceased owners’ remains as a last resort. However, this behavior is not inherent to all cats, and their natural instincts primarily drive them to hunt live prey. The bond between cats and their owners is built on trust, love, and companionship, making it unlikely for cats to resort to such extreme measures unless driven by dire circumstances. In the end, it is crucial to remember that responsible pet ownership includes making arrangements for the care of our beloved pets in the event of our passing. By ensuring that a support network is in place to care for our feline companions, we can provide them with the love and attention they deserve, even if we are no longer there to do so ourselves.
Do you ever feel like the world is changing too fast? Like the people and culture you grew up with are disappearing? Like you are becoming a stranger in your own country?
If you do, you are not alone. Millions of people around the world share your concerns. They are aware of a sinister plan that is unfolding before our eyes. A plan that threatens to destroy everything we hold dear.
The plan is called the Great Replacement Theory. It is the idea that the white population of Western countries is being systematically replaced by non-white immigrants, especially from Muslim countries. This is a deliberate plan by global elites, such as the WEF, the United Nations, the European Union, the Uniparty and the Mainstream Media, to wipe out the identity, culture, and sovereignty of Western civilization.
This replacement will lead to the loss of democracy, freedom, and human rights and the rise of violence, terrorism, and civil war.
In this article, we will explain the origins and evidence of the Great Replacement Theory and how it ties into mass migration.
The Origins of the Great Replacement Theory
The Great Replacement Theory was first coined and popularized by a French writer named Renaud Camus. He wrote a book in 2011 called Le Grand Remplacement, which means The Great Replacement in English. In his book, he described how France was undergoing “colonization by substitution” by immigrants from Africa and the Middle East, who were encouraged by the political and cultural elites to replace the native French people.
Camus blamed the European Union for imposing a “genocidal” policy of mass immigration and multiculturalism on its member states. He also accused the media of hiding the truth and brainwashing the public. He called for a “national preference” to protect the identity and sovereignty of France.
Camus’s book sparked a wave of interest and support among people in Europe and America. Many of them adopted his terms and his ideas and applied them to their own national contexts. They realized the Great Replacement was a global plot that was affecting all Western countries.
The Evidence of the Great Replacement Theory
The Great Replacement Theory is not just a conspiracy theory, but a reality that is happening before our eyes. The evidence is clear and undeniable. Here are some facts and figures that prove it:
According to the United Nations, the world’s population is expected to grow from 7.8 billion in 2020 to 9.7 billion in 2050, with most of the growth occurring in Africa and Asia. Meanwhile, the population of Europe is projected to decline from 747 million in 2020 to 710 million in 2050, with the median age increasing from 42.5 to 47.9 years. The population of North America is expected to increase slightly from 368 million in 2020 to 434 million in 2050, but with a significant change in the racial and ethnic composition. By 2050, the non-Hispanic white population will drop from 60% to 44%, while the Hispanic population will rise from 18% to 27% and the Asian population from 6% to 9%.
According to the International Organization for Migration, there were 272 million international migrants in the world in 2019, representing 3.5% of the global population. Of these, 82 million were in Europe, 59 million in North America, and 51 million in Asia. The main countries of origin of migrants were India, Mexico, China, Russia, and Syria. The main countries of destination were the US, Germany, Saudi Arabia, Russia, and the UK.
According to the UN Refugee Agency, there were 79.5 million forcibly displaced people in the world in 2019, including 26 million refugees, 45.7 million internally displaced people, and 4.2 million asylum seekers. The main countries of origin of the refugees were Syria, Venezuela, Afghanistan, South Sudan, and Myanmar. The main countries of asylum were Turkey, Colombia, Pakistan, Uganda, and Germany.
These numbers show that the Great Replacement is not a myth but a fact. They show that the white population of Western countries is shrinking, aging, and losing its cultural and religious identity. They show that the non-white population of Western countries is growing, young, and asserting its cultural and religious identity. Likewise, they show that as Western countries become more diverse, they are becoming more divided and more unstable.
The Consequences of the Great Replacement Theory
The Great Replacement Theory is not just a demographic phenomenon but a political and cultural one. It has profound and alarming implications for every aspect of our society, such as the economy, politics, culture, and security. Here are some of the consequences that we can expect:
Politics will become more polarized, more fragmented, and more corrupt. The white population will lose its political power and influence, while the non-white population will gain more representation and influence. The immigrants will form their own ethnic and religious parties or join the existing left-wing and liberal parties, while the natives will form their own nationalist and populist parties. The political system will become more unstable and dysfunctional, unable to reach consensus or solve problems.
The culture will become more diluted, more confused, and more hostile. The population will lose its cultural identity and heritage, while the immigrant population will retain or impose its cultural identity and heritage. The immigrants will refuse to assimilate or integrate into the host society and demand that the host society accommodate their values and customs. The natural citizens will resist or resent the changes in their society and retreat into their own enclaves and bubbles. The cultural diversity will turn into cultural clashes and conflicts.
Security will become more threatened, more vulnerable, and more chaotic. The natural citizen population will face more attacks and threats from the “refugee” population, especially from the radical and extremist elements. The immigrants will bring with them their own conflicts and grievances, and create new ones in their host countries. The natives will react with fear and anger. The security forces will be overwhelmed and outnumbered, or infiltrated and corrupted. The law and order will break down, and civil wars will break out.
These consequences show that the Great Replacement is not a blessing but a curse. They show that the citizen population of Western countries is facing an existential crisis and a mortal danger. They show that Western civilization is on the verge of collapse and destruction.
The Resistance to the Great Replacement Theory
The Great Replacement Theory is not inevitable, but preventable. It is not a natural process but a man-made plan. It is not a fait accompli, but a challenge to overcome.
We can and must resist the Great Replacement. We must stop the globalist agenda that seeks to erase our heritage and values. Furthermore, we can, and we must, stop the mass immigration that threatens to overwhelm and replace us. We must stop the multiculturalism that dilutes and divides us. We must stop the censorship and propaganda that silences and brainwashes us. Likewise, we must stop the tyranny and oppression that threaten to enslave and destroy us.
We have every right to preserve our identity, culture, and sovereignty. We have a right to defend our liberty, freedom, and human rights. Likewise, we have a right to secure our future and our children’s future.
In the midst of war’s uncertainty and a young nation’s fragile hope, a story surfaced that would reach almost mythical status. This is the story of George Washington’s vision, a prophetic dream that was said to have been experienced by the very man who led America in its infancy. This tale wasn’t spread far and wide in the days right after it happened, but it waited nearly a century before becoming known when it was published in the National Tribune in December 1880.
The narrative of George Washington’s vision has intrigue, suspense, and a glimpse into what the future might hold. It’s a curious piece of American folklore that offers both a warning and a promise—it’s a story of America’s trials and its potential triumphs through the eyes of its first President.
A Glimpse into the Unknown
The vision, according to the storytelling, took place in the bitter winter of 1777, a winter that saw Washington and his troops weathering hard times at Valley Forge. Washington, worn by the weight of war and leadership, supposedly found some solitude and fell into a state of contemplation. It is here, at this moment of quiet reflection, that the vision is said to have occurred.
According to the tale, Washington saw a mysterious figure, perhaps an angel, who led him through a series of scenes showing the future of America. This shadowy visitor showed him three great events that would come to pass.
The Three Perils of America
The first scene revealed to Washington was America embroiled in another great struggle, this time within its own borders. It was the Civil War, where brother would fight against brother. In this vision, the young country was tested mightily but emerged united, a stronger nation forged from the flames of conflict.
Entranced by the vividness of the angelic vision, Washington then saw a second scene. This time, vast oceans separated America from its new adversary. Across these waters, he witnessed America at war once more, engaged in tremendous battles on foreign soil. This part of the vision rings true to what we now recognize as World Wars, where America played a crucial role in the victories over nations that threatened peace and democracy.
The third and final threat was the most mysterious and is often debated for its meaning. In this scene, chaos emerged within America’s borders once again—cities burned, and a great darkness smothered the land. Yet, from this darkness, hope would emerge. America would once again find its way, recovering from the brink and becoming a beacon of light to the rest of the world.
A Story of Resilience
The article that surfaced in the National Tribune many years later tells us more than just a story of Washington’s dream; it speaks to the collective hope and enduring spirit of America. Whether Washington really had such a vision is not the point. The story survived and was shared because it resonates on a deeper level—it’s about the belief in the resilience of a nation, the conviction that no matter the challenge, through unity and courage, America can and will overcome.
Why Does It Matter?
When the National Tribune published this account, it was a period of rebuilding and reflection. The country had recently endured the devastating Civil War and was still nursing the wounds of division and loss. The story of Washington’s vision offered comfort and a sense of destiny for a nation looking to rebuild and find its purpose again.
Even if the vision was more of a legend than a fact, the power it held was real. It acted like a lighthouse for the spirit of the country, guiding the collective heart of the nation toward the feeling that all struggles have a reason and a conclusion in sight.
Holding onto Hope
The story of George Washington’s vision is less about the mystic experience and more about what it represents. It illustrates the idea that America is meant to weather storms, to struggle, but ultimately to emerge stronger, unified, and with a deeper commitment to the principles of freedom and justice.
Not every day requires the revelation of an angel or the foresight of a vision. Sometimes, the most profound truths are found in the stories we choose to believe and the hope we choose to hold onto. As a nation, the journey is rarely simple or easy, but there is comfort in folklore that suggests our struggles are part of a larger, grander tapestry of destiny.
As readers in the 1880s devoured the words printed about the vision of their first leader, it gave them a sense of looking forward, past the difficulties, to grasp a collective belief that there was greatness ahead. It reaffirmed the American dream: the idea that no matter what hardships we face, we have the capability to rise above and find a brighter future.
This is where the value of the story of George Washington’s vision truly lies. Not in the predictive power of a dream, but in the enduring belief in the promise of the nation and the relentless pursuit of a more perfect union.
George Washington was one of the most influential figures in American history. He led the Continental Army to victory in the Revolutionary War, presided over the Constitutional Convention, and served as the first President of the United States. He is widely revered as the “Father of the Nation” and a symbol of courage, wisdom, and integrity.
But how did this remarkable man die? What were the events and causes that led to his demise? And what can we learn from his final hours?
In this article, we will explore the last day of George Washington, and how he succumbed to a throat infection that proved fatal in a matter of hours.
The Morning Ride
On Thursday, December 12, 1799, George Washington was out on horseback supervising farming activities on his estate at Mount Vernon, Virginia. He was 67 years old, and had retired from public life two years earlier. He enjoyed spending time on his plantation, overseeing the work of his slaves and managing his crops and livestock.
The weather that day was cold and wet, with light snow, hail, and rain. Washington rode for about five hours, from late morning until three in the afternoon. He was wearing his usual riding clothes, which consisted of a woolen coat, a waistcoat, breeches, boots, and a hat. He did not wear a scarf or a cloak, as he was accustomed to the cold.
When he returned to his mansion, he was soaked and shivering. His wife, Martha, suggested that he change out of his wet clothes before dinner, but Washington refused. He was known for his punctuality, and did not want to keep his guests waiting. He also did not think much of his exposure to the elements, as he had endured harsher conditions during his military campaigns.
He ate his dinner as usual, and then spent the evening reading the newspapers with his secretary, Tobias Lear, and his wife. He also wrote some letters and attended to some business matters. He seemed to be in good spirits, and did not complain of any discomfort.
The Sore Throat
However, around two in the morning, Washington woke up with a sore throat. He felt a sharp pain whenever he swallowed, and had difficulty breathing and speaking. He told his wife that he was very sick, and asked her to bring him some honey and vinegar to soothe his throat. Martha was alarmed by his condition, and wanted to send for a doctor, but Washington stopped her. He did not want to expose her to the cold, as she had just recovered from a cold herself.
He tried to go back to sleep, but his symptoms worsened. He became restless and agitated, and could not find a comfortable position. He also developed a fever and a cough, and started to sweat profusely.
At daybreak, Martha sent for Tobias Lear, who rushed to the room. He found Washington in bed, gasping for air and barely able to speak. He immediately sent for George Rawlins, an overseer at Mount Vernon, who had some experience in bloodletting. Washington believed that bloodletting was an effective remedy for many ailments, and requested that Rawlins bleed him. Lear also sent for Dr. James Craik, Washington’s family doctor and trusted friend for forty years, who lived in Alexandria, about 10 miles away.
Rawlins arrived first, and extracted about half a pint of blood from Washington’s arm. Washington felt some relief, but it was short-lived. He asked to be bled again, but Martha and Lear objected. They were worried that he would lose too much blood, and weaken his already frail body.
The Doctors Arrive
Dr. Craik arrived around nine in the morning, and examined Washington. He diagnosed him with “cynanche trachealis”, also known as the croup, an inflammation of the throat that obstructed the airway. He bled him a second time, and applied a blister to his throat, hoping to draw out the infection. He also ordered a solution of vinegar and sage tea to be prepared for gargling.
However, none of these treatments helped. Washington’s condition continued to deteriorate, and he became more and more suffocated. He could not swallow the vinegar and tea, and almost choked when he tried. He also could not tolerate the blister, and asked to have it removed.
Martha, seeing that Craik was at a loss, requested that he send for another doctor. Craik agreed, and sent for Dr. Gustavus Brown, a physician from Port Tobacco, Maryland, who had a reputation for diagnosis and moderate medicating. Craik also sent for a third doctor, Dr. Elisha Cullen Dick, a young and innovative surgeon from Alexandria. He hoped that one of them would have a better idea of how to treat Washington’s illness.
Dr. Brown arrived around three in the afternoon, and Dr. Dick shortly after. They consulted with Craik, and agreed that Washington had a severe case of quinsy, or tonsillitis, that had spread to his larynx and trachea. They decided to try another round of bloodletting, hoping to reduce the inflammation and ease the pressure on his throat. They also administered an enema, and applied more blisters to his chest and feet.
Washington consented to these procedures, but they had no effect. He lost about four pints of blood in total, or about 40 percent of his blood volume. He became weaker and paler, and his pulse grew fainter and irregular. He realized that he was dying, and asked for his will. He made some minor changes to it, and gave it to Lear. He also gave some instructions about his funeral, and asked to be buried in the family vault at Mount Vernon.
The Final Moments
As the sun set, Washington’s breathing became more labored and noisy. He was in great pain, and could hardly speak. He whispered to Lear, “I am just going. Have me decently buried; and do not let my body be put into the vault less than three days after I am dead.” He then asked, “Do you understand me?” Lear replied, “Yes, sir.” Washington said, “Tis well.”
He then closed his eyes, and remained silent for a while. He opened them again, and looked at the doctors. He said, “Doctor, I die hard; but I am not afraid to go.” He then looked at Lear, and said, “I thank you for your attentions; but I pray you to take no more trouble about me. Let me go off quietly. I cannot last long.”
He then uttered his last words, “Tis well.” He tried to lift his hand to his face, but it fell back. He breathed his last at 10:20 in the evening, on Saturday, December 14, 1799.
Martha, who was sitting at the foot of the bed, said, “Tis well. All is now over. I shall soon follow him. I have no more trials to pass through.”
The doctors confirmed his death, and left the room. Lear stayed with Martha, and tried to comfort her. He also sent a letter to Congress, informing them of the sad news.
The Aftermath
The news of Washington’s death spread quickly, and caused a wave of grief and mourning throughout the nation. He was widely honored and celebrated as a hero, a patriot, and a statesman. His funeral was held on December 18, at Mount Vernon, and was attended by thousands of people, including many dignitaries and military officers. His body was placed in a lead coffin, and then in a wooden one, and then in a brick vault. A simple inscription on the vault read, “I am the Resurrection and the Life.”
The cause of Washington’s death has been debated by historians and medical experts for over two centuries. Some have suggested that he died from diphtheria, pneumonia, strep throat, or epiglottitis. Some have also argued that the treatments he received, especially the bloodletting, hastened his death, rather than helped him.
However, the exact diagnosis and the role of the doctors remain uncertain. What is certain is that Washington died from a throat infection that was common and treatable in his time, but that proved fatal in his case. He died as he lived, with dignity, courage, and grace.
Final Thoughts
George Washington was a remarkable man, who played a crucial role in the founding and shaping of the United States. He was admired and respected by his contemporaries, and by generations of Americans. He left behind a legacy of leadership, service, and virtue, that continues to inspire and guide us today.
His death was a tragic and unexpected event, that shocked and saddened the nation. He died from a throat infection that was caused by his exposure to the cold and wet weather, and that was aggravated by the treatments he received. He died in his bed, surrounded by his wife, his secretary, and his doctors. He died peacefully, and with faith.
He died as the Father of the Nation, and as a friend of mankind.
