Muslim inbreeding is now a worldwide problem.
Here’s an explanation for Islamic terrorism that’s never suggested. A never-spoken-about problem with Muslims is their inbreeding as a result of their long and deeply ingrained practice of marrying first cousins — a practice that has been prohibited in the Judeo-Christian tradition since the days of Moses.
With the unbridled immigration from Muslim countries to the West increasing, an age-old problem emerged anew. Chronic inbreeding among Muslim populations is now our problem.
Given the new wave of Muslim attacks in Europe, it is worth revisiting a 2010 report by Nicolai Sennels. His investigation, published on PJ Media, has some difficult truths to admit. They may not be politically correct, but they are facts nevertheless.
First, it is important to realize why Muslim inbreeding is even acceptable in Islam.
Massive inbreeding among Muslims has been going on since their prophet allowed first-cousin marriages more than 50 generations (1,400 years) ago. For many Muslims, therefore, intermarriage is regarded as being part of their religion. In many Muslim communities, it is a source of social status to marry one’s daughter or son to his or her cousin. Intermarriage also ensures that wealth is kept within the family. Islam’s strict authoritarianism plays a large role as well: keeping daughters and sons close gives families more power to control and decide their choices and lifestyles.
Muslim Inbreeding has now affected most of the Islamic population.
Today, 70 percent of all Pakistanis are inbred and in Turkey the amount is between 25-30 percent (Jyllands-Posten, 27/2 2009 “More stillbirths among immigrants“). A rough estimate reveals that close to half of everybody living in the Arab world is inbred. A large percentage of the parents that are blood related come from families where intermarriage has been a tradition for generations.
A BBC investigation in Britain several years ago revealed that at least 55% of the Pakistani community in Britain was married to a first cousin. The Times of India affirmed that “this is thought to be linked to the probability that a British Pakistani family is at least 13 times more likely than the general population to have children with recessive genetic disorders.”
The BBC’s research also discovered that while British Pakistanis accounted for just 3.4% of all births in Britain, they accounted for 30% of all British children with recessive disorders and a higher rate of infant mortality. It is not a surprise, therefore, that, in response to this evidence, a Labour Party MP has called for a ban on first-cousin marriage.
Medical evidence shows that one of the negative consequences of inbreeding is a 100 percent increase in the risk of stillbirths. One study comparing Norwegians and Pakistanis shows the risk that the child dies during labor increases by 50 percent. The risk of death due to autosomal recessive disorders — e.g., cystic fibrosis and spinal muscular atrophy — is 18 times higher. Risk of death due to malformations is 10 times higher. Mental health is also at risk: the probability of depression is higher in communities where consanguine marriages are also high. The closer the blood relative, the higher the risk of mental and physical retardation and schizophrenic illness.
And then there are the findings on intelligence. Research shows that if one’s parents are cousins, intelligence goes down 10-16 IQ points. The risk of having an IQ lower than 70 (criterion for being “retarded”) increases 400 percent among children from cousin marriages. An academic paper published in the Indian National Science Academy found that “the onset of various social profiles like visual fixation, social smile, sound seizures, oral expression and hand-grasping are significantly delayed among the new-born inbred babies.” Another study found that Indian Muslim school boys whose parents were first cousins tested significantly lower than boys whose parents were unrelated in a non-verbal test on intelligence.
It is estimated that one third of all handicapped people in Copenhagen have a foreign background. Sixty four percent of school children in Denmark with Arabic parents are illiterate after 10 years in the Danish school system. The same study concludes that in reading ability, mathematics, and science, the pattern is the same: “The bilingual (largely Muslim) immigrants’ skills are exceedingly poor compared to their Danish
classmates.”These problems within Islam bring many detriments to Western countries. Expenses related to mentally and physically handicapped Muslim immigrants, for instance, severely drain the budgets and resources of our societies. Look at Denmark, for example: one-third of the budget for the country’s schools is spent on children with special needs. Muslim children are grossly over represented among these children. More than half of all children in schools for children with mental and physical handicaps in Copenhagen are foreigners — of whom Muslims are by far the largest group. One study concludes that “foreigners inbreeding costs our municipalities millions” because of the many handicapped children and adults.
Previously:
Muslim Behavior/Terrorism Correlated With Population Size
It’s also why they have low IQ
This is largely nonsense. The link about 10-16% doesn’t work. Lower scores can also be attributed to backward cultures; some made so by their religion. There are highly inbred hollows in Appalachia. Some have lower than average IQ; some higher. Inbreeding accentuates whatever is present. Cleopatra was the offspring of several sequential brother sister matings. Peripheral and traditionally isolated cultures like Norway, Finland, Ireland, or Polynesia are highly inbred. Going back 20 generations produced over 1M ancestors at that generation line. if there were, for instance, only 200,000 people in Finland 20 generations ago, the average contemporary Finn has, on average, each of those ancestors showing up five times in his/her ancestry yet Finnish children score as high as east Asians on math tests. Sub-Saharan Africans have the most DNA diversity. Arab Muslims were clever enough to give us 9/11. Don’t let your guard down based on bad science.
It’s the retards doing suicide attacks, which the muslims have a lot of. Idk how you can say this is nonsense.
I was referring to the article’s point that Muslims have low IQ because of inbreeding as nonsense rather than a Muslim proclivity to violence to advance their cause. That is cultural. Most soldiers and some civilians, in any culture, take risks and even die to promote their cause.
I don’t know of anyone since WWII willing to suicide themselves to forward the cause they believe in.
Some military personnel, 9/11 firemen who climbed the towers to save people, and Christian missionaries in some countries, for starters, might not have the goal of suicide but they risk or risked their lives when the odds ware/were against them. Some pregnant women with cancer refuse drugs for the safety of their baby. They are heroes too although their goal is not suicide.
So none since WWII? Risking life to save lives versus strapping yourself to a bomb to kill other people with you is much different.
You are off topic but both are acts of self-sacrifice and bravery. Back on topic, this article did not produce any evidence that Muslim peoples have lower intelligence. People who believe such garbage risk underestimating the enemy allowing things like 9/11 to happen.
Much of this is attributable to politicians and their inward-focus, resulting in no pre-emptive legislation to get ahead of such problems as immigration from nations of deficient culture and genetic complements. They are like firemen who arrive after the house burns down and shout “Fire!” in order to gain notoriety – when real firemen inspect ahead of time to prevent the fire, and rush to the fire early on. Once problems like this arise, it’s nearly impossible to rectify them; what do you do – send second and third generation families back to a homeland they no longer integrate with or speak the language of? They are now in the gene pool of their adopted countries, genetically and culturally polluting it. This is the argument for controlled immigration – acceptance of only those compatible with, and contributory to, the existing pool. But there is no end of PC warriors who will disparage this common-sense management on the false grounds of xenophobia or racism, shaming politicians and voters alike into preposterous beliefs that violate common sense. No field of wheat flourishes that is overwhelmed with weeds.