Rudy Giuliani Took Down the Mob. Is He Taking Down the Deep State Next?

 Conspiracy, Featured, Political  Comments Off on Rudy Giuliani Took Down the Mob. Is He Taking Down the Deep State Next?
Jul 282025
 

Rudy Giuliani helped crush the Mafia. Could he be helping Trump clean out Washington next?

The Man Who Took Down the Five Families

Rudy Giuliani doesn’t need an introduction. In the 1980s, when New York was drowning in organized crime, Giuliani stepped into the chaos and did the impossible. He used the law like a scalpel. He didn’t just arrest mobsters—he took down entire crime families. The Gambinos. The Genoveses. The Luccheses. All of them.

Back then, Giuliani didn’t chase headlines. He chased justice. And justice wasn’t popular with the people in charge.

Giuliani proved he could take on complex, powerful organizations that operated in secret and pulled strings behind the scenes. He didn’t blink. He didn’t back down. He knew how to win a war that couldn’t be fought in the open.

Which brings us to now.

What If the Same Skills Are in Play Again?

Let’s fast forward to 2025.

Donald Trump won the 2024 election. He’s back in the White House. And the air in Washington feels electric again. This time, the fight isn’t just about policy. It’s about cleaning house. It’s about exposing what’s been happening in the shadows since 2016—and maybe even before that.

Behind the scenes, whispers are getting louder.

The Department of Justice has just announced the formation of a new Strike Force. Their mission? Investigate Barack Obama and top officials from the Obama administration. People like Hillary Clinton, James Comey, John Brennan, and James Clapper. Names we’ve heard again and again.

The Strike Force is digging into what many have called a silent coup—a coordinated plan to block and remove Donald Trump from power before he could even take the oath of office in 2017.

But here’s the million-dollar question:

Is Rudy Giuliani helping lead this charge from the shadows?

Giuliani’s Playbook: Silence, Strategy, Precision

Let’s think clearly for a moment.

If you were launching a deep, surgical operation to take down powerful people who control media, intelligence, and finance—would you put your best strategist on camera every night?

Of course not.

You’d keep him out of the spotlight. You’d let him operate like he did in the mob trials—quietly, surgically, relentlessly.

That’s exactly what Giuliani might be doing now.

Keeping his name off the front page protects him. It keeps the media from launching daily smear campaigns. It stops the Deep State from turning its weapons on him. And it gives him room to operate with precision—just like he did when taking down the Mafia.

Giuliani doesn’t need attention. He needs results.

A War Much Bigger Than Politics

We’re not talking about a simple political rivalry. This isn’t Democrats vs. Republicans.

This is about a group of people who believe they’re above the will of the voters. People who have used the intelligence community, the media, and global institutions to push their version of control.

Giuliani’s experience makes him uniquely suited to this battle.

He understands how secret networks operate. He understands how they protect each other, how they launder influence, and how they hide in plain sight. He spent years prosecuting people who thought they’d never be touched.

And now, he might be bringing those same skills to Washington.

The Strike Force Has Teeth—And a Target

The DOJ’s new Strike Force isn’t just a political stunt.

It’s a sign that things are shifting.

According to DOJ insiders, the team is already gathering evidence that shows coordination between intelligence officials, political operatives, and media figures to undermine Trump’s first presidency. Documents, emails, texts—none of it looks good for the people involved.

We’re talking about an operation to interfere with an election and sabotage a sitting president.

It’s not a theory. It’s a crime.

If Giuliani is advising the Strike Force, even unofficially, then the people involved should be nervous. Very nervous.

Why the Media Is So Quiet About Giuliani

Let’s address the silence.

Giuliani has been suspiciously absent from mainstream news lately. That’s not because he’s irrelevant. It’s because the media doesn’t want to talk about what he’s doing.

Think about it.

The same media that ran 24/7 coverage during the Russia hoax has gone silent now that investigations are turning the other way. They’re not reporting. They’re protecting.

If Giuliani is working behind the curtain to dismantle the machine, then keeping him out of the news helps the mission. It’s not just strategy—it’s survival.

You don’t expose your knight until he’s ready to strike.

The Pattern Always Repeats

Look at the timeline.

In 2016, the Clinton campaign pushed the Russia story. Intelligence agencies played along. The FBI ran with it. The media amplified it.

It was coordinated. It was pre-planned.

Now, in 2025, the people who orchestrated it are being investigated. The same agencies that were used as weapons are being forced to answer for their actions.

And who better to help unravel a criminal network than the man who already did it once?

Giuliani was made for this moment.

What Comes Next?

The public should be watching carefully.

The DOJ Strike Force may be the most important investigation in modern history. It’s not just about politics. It’s about restoring trust. It’s about making sure the country is run by elected leaders, not unelected insiders.

Giuliani’s silence speaks volumes. His past proves he’s not afraid of powerful enemies. And the pieces are falling into place.

This time, the criminals aren’t wearing tracksuits and running numbers. They’re wearing suits and running agencies.

But Rudy’s been here before.

And if he is part of this fight—quietly, strategically, relentlessly—then the Deep State might finally have met its match.

Mar 062017
 
Congresswoman Tulsi Gabbard has chosen to go against the Mainstream Media’s narrative by accusing the Obama Administration of funding and arming terror groups Al-Qaeda and ISIS.

Congresswoman Tulsi Gabbard Proposes Radical Solution To Refugee Crisis

US Representative Tulsi Gabbard is proving to be quite the thorn in the side of the establishment warmongers. In January, Gabbard went on a secret trip to Syria to investigate first hand and to find the truth that the Mainstream Media is covering up about the Syrian war. Since then, this brave congresswoman has remained steadfast in her mission to show Americans how their tax dollars are funding terrorism in the Middle East.

In a press conference this week, Gabbard called on President Trump to “end the regime change in Syria,” adding that this is what is causing the refugee crisis.

“The most important question is, how do we address the cause of these people fleeing their homes,” Gabbard stated before pointing to a bill that she’s submitted to Congress this year that would help in solving this problem.

The bill’s premise to stop the refugee crisis is quite simple — stop arming the terrorists.

“Stop Arming Terrorists Act,” or HR 608, would ban the use of US taxpayers’ funds to aid terrorist groups affiliated with Al-Qaeda or Islamic State (IS, formerly ISIS/ISIL).“For years, our government has been providing both direct and indirect support to these armed militant groups, who are working directly with or under the command of terrorist groups like Al-Qaeda and ISIS, all in their effort and fight to overthrow the Syrian government,” Gabbard said in an interview Wednesday.

During her visit to Syria in January, Gabbard met with refugees and victims of the US-backed Syrian regime change, who all asked the same question — why is the US funding terrorism.

“I’ll tell you what I heard from the Syrian people that I met with, Jake, walking down the street in Aleppo, in Damascus, hearing from them.

They expressed happiness and joy at seeing an American walking through their streets. But they also asked why the U.S. and its allies are providing support and arms to terrorist groups like al-Nusra, al-Qaida or al-Sham, ISIS who are on the ground there, raping, kidnapping, torturing and killing the Syrian people.

They asked me, why is the United States and its allies supporting these terrorist groups who are destroying Syria when it was al-Qaeda who attacked the United States on 9/11, not Syria. I didn’t have an answer for them,” Gabbard said, noting the clear dismay the average Syrian has for the U.S. support of al-Qaeda – a proposition which every American should equally question.

The reality is… every place that I went, every person that I spoke to, I asked this question to them, and without hesitation, they said, there are no moderate rebels. Who are these moderate rebels that people keep speaking of?

Regardless of the name of these groups, the strongest fighting force on the ground in Syria is al Nusra, or al-Qaeda and ISIS. That is a fact,” Gabbard said.

As pro-war neocons — consistently beating the war drum in spite of never actually spending any time in the military — lash out at Gabbard for her Syrian trip and proposed legislation, other members of Congress, who’ve actually been in the military (like Gabbard), are showing their full support of the bill.

Representative Tom Garrett (R-Virginia), a US Army veteran, is one of those supporters who said that the goal in Syria should be peace.

“Tulsi understands that arming the so-called ‘rebels’ in Syria has only led to more bloodshed, more suffering, and created more refugees,” Tima Kurdi said in a statement on Tuesday.A military solution in Syria is not the answer. I hope that President Trump will stop arming terrorists and commit to a political solution in Syria—it is the only way to restore peace.”

H.R.608 — 115th Congress (2017-2018)

 
James Mattis

Previously:
Congresswoman Exposes Damning Truth After Visit To Syria: “There Are No Moderate Rebels”

 
 
via

Jan 312017
 
Congresswoman Tulsi Gabbard didn’t hold anything back in her interview on CNN.

Congresswoman Tulsi Gabbard Exposes Damning Truth After Visit To Syria: “There Are No Moderate Rebels”

Congresswoman Tulsi Gabbard, a Democratic Representative from Hawaii, recently visited Syria in secret for four days and returned to the U.S. with a message based on what she saw. She appeared on CNN to speak with Jake Tapper on Wednesday and essentially brief him on what Syrian people told her and also to discuss her impromptu meeting with Syria’s President Assad. In the interview, Gabbard said,

“[The Syrian people] expressed happiness and joy at seeing an American walking through their streets. But they also asked why the U.S. and its allies are providing support and arms to terrorist groups like al-Nusra, al-Qaida or al-Sham, ISIS who are on the ground there, raping, kidnapping, torturing and killing the Syrian people.”

For several years, Obama’s Administration has been touting their financial and armaments backing of ‘moderate rebels,’ who are supposed to be rebel forces that are not as bad or inhumane as al-Qaida, ISIS, and the like. Though the idea that moderate rebels exists has been essentially debunked by video footage of these rebels beheading people and blowing up evacuation buses for humanitarians, there have been no U.S. officials that have visited the area since the war broke out to discuss these groups. That’s what makes Gabbard’s visit so unique and important.

Gabbard said that the plight of Syrian people and their country has weighed on her heart for several years and that this is what prompted her to make a secret trek to the suffering nation. The U.S. has been backing these so-called ‘moderate rebels’ for years as a way to show support for overthrowing Assad as president, but many of the provided weapons have made their way to extreme groups, like ISIS. Gabbard said of her discussions with citizens,

“They asked me, why is the United States and its allies supporting these terrorist groups who are destroying Syria when it was al Qaida who attacked the United States on 9/11, not Syria. I didn’t have an answer for them…. There is a number of different, other groups — all of them essentially are fighting alongside, with, or under the command of the strongest group on the ground that’s trying to overthrow Assad.”

According to Gabbard, what’s most frightening to the Syrian people is the rebels winning the war and taking over the government, only to wreak more havoc with continuous assaults against citizens. Though Gabbard recognized that President Assad has done horrible things, such as using chemical weapons against his own citizens in an effort to put out the fires of their protesting and hostility, she acknowledged that his power means it’s necessary to open up a dialogue with him. As Tapper pointed out, Assad has killed hundreds of thousands of his own people rather than listening to their wants and needs and is, in the end, responsible for the breakout of the civil war and the fleeing of his people. Gabbard responded by saying,

“Whatever you think about President Assad, the fact is that he is the president of Syria,” Tulsi replied. “In order for any peace agreement, in order for any possibility of a viable peace agreement to occur, there has to be a conversation with him,” she said. “The Syrian people will determine his outcome and what happens with their government and their future, but our focus, my focus, my commitment is on ending this war that has caused so much suffering to the Syrian people.”

What she means is that it’s unfair for the U.S. to intervene and take the side of the people that all of the civilians are against. In the end, it’s the Syrians that will decide theirs and Assad’s fate when the civil war is over and that an agreement can be reached after the war has come to a stop, not during. Though her opinion may be unpopular, they are based on her very real experiences with Syrian civilians, who are extremely confused at the term ‘moderate rebels’ and affirm that “there are no moderate rebels.”

The war is far from over, but a new administration could mean an entirely different approach to the war for the U.S. This could mean siding with Russia and Iran by backing President Assad’s attack on the rebels or it could, however unlikely it may be, mean pulling support for either side of the war whatsoever.

Watch the full interview below.

 

Previously:
What’s Really Going On In Syria? Are We Being Lied To?
Leaked John Kerry Audio Reveals Obama Intentionally Allowed The Rise Of ISIS
Syrians in Aleppo Chanting: “Clinton, you cow, leave us alone”

Source…