How the Great Replacement Theory Explains the World

The Great Replacement Theory. It is the idea that the white population of Western countries is being systematically replaced by non-white immigrants, especially from Muslim countries. This is a deliberate plan by global elites, such as the WEF, the United Nations, the European Union, the Uniparty and the Mainstream Media, to wipe out the identity, culture, and sovereignty of Western civilization.

Do you ever feel like the world is changing too fast? Like the people and culture you grew up with are disappearing? Like you are becoming a stranger in your own country?

If you do, you are not alone. Millions of people around the world share your concerns. They are aware of a sinister plan that is unfolding before our eyes. A plan that threatens to destroy everything we hold dear.

The plan is called the Great Replacement Theory. It is the idea that the white population of Western countries is being systematically replaced by non-white immigrants, especially from Muslim countries. This is a deliberate plan by global elites, such as the WEF, the United Nations, the European Union, the Uniparty and the Mainstream Media, to wipe out the identity, culture, and sovereignty of Western civilization.

This replacement will lead to the loss of democracy, freedom, and human rights and the rise of violence, terrorism, and civil war.

In this article, we will explain the origins and evidence of the Great Replacement Theory and how it ties into mass migration.

The Origins of the Great Replacement Theory

The Great Replacement Theory was first coined and popularized by a French writer named Renaud Camus. He wrote a book in 2011 called Le Grand Remplacement, which means The Great Replacement in English. In his book, he described how France was undergoing “colonization by substitution” by immigrants from Africa and the Middle East, who were encouraged by the political and cultural elites to replace the native French people.

Camus blamed the European Union for imposing a “genocidal” policy of mass immigration and multiculturalism on its member states. He also accused the media of hiding the truth and brainwashing the public. He called for a “national preference” to protect the identity and sovereignty of France.

Camus’s book sparked a wave of interest and support among people in Europe and America. Many of them adopted his terms and his ideas and applied them to their own national contexts. They realized the Great Replacement was a global plot that was affecting all Western countries.

The Evidence of the Great Replacement Theory

The Great Replacement Theory is not just a conspiracy theory, but a reality that is happening before our eyes. The evidence is clear and undeniable. Here are some facts and figures that prove it:

These numbers show that the Great Replacement is not a myth but a fact. They show that the white population of Western countries is shrinking, aging, and losing its cultural and religious identity. They show that the non-white population of Western countries is growing, young, and asserting its cultural and religious identity. Likewise, they show that as Western countries become more diverse, they are becoming more divided and more unstable.

The Consequences of the Great Replacement Theory

The Great Replacement Theory is not just a demographic phenomenon but a political and cultural one. It has profound and alarming implications for every aspect of our society, such as the economy, politics, culture, and security. Here are some of the consequences that we can expect:

  • The economy will suffer from lower productivity, higher unemployment, and higher welfare costs. Immigrants will compete with the natives for scarce resources and opportunities, leading to social unrest and violence.
  • Politics will become more polarized, more fragmented, and more corrupt. The white population will lose its political power and influence, while the non-white population will gain more representation and influence. The immigrants will form their own ethnic and religious parties or join the existing left-wing and liberal parties, while the natives will form their own nationalist and populist parties. The political system will become more unstable and dysfunctional, unable to reach consensus or solve problems.
  • The culture will become more diluted, more confused, and more hostile. The population will lose its cultural identity and heritage, while the immigrant population will retain or impose its cultural identity and heritage. The immigrants will refuse to assimilate or integrate into the host society and demand that the host society accommodate their values and customs. The natural citizens will resist or resent the changes in their society and retreat into their own enclaves and bubbles. The cultural diversity will turn into cultural clashes and conflicts.
  • Security will become more threatened, more vulnerable, and more chaotic. The natural citizen population will face more attacks and threats from the “refugee” population, especially from the radical and extremist elements. The immigrants will bring with them their own conflicts and grievances, and create new ones in their host countries. The natives will react with fear and anger. The security forces will be overwhelmed and outnumbered, or infiltrated and corrupted. The law and order will break down, and civil wars will break out.

These consequences show that the Great Replacement is not a blessing but a curse. They show that the citizen population of Western countries is facing an existential crisis and a mortal danger. They show that Western civilization is on the verge of collapse and destruction.

The Resistance to the Great Replacement Theory

The Great Replacement Theory is not inevitable, but preventable. It is not a natural process but a man-made plan. It is not a fait accompli, but a challenge to overcome.

We can and must resist the Great Replacement. We must stop the globalist agenda that seeks to erase our heritage and values. Furthermore, we can, and we must, stop the mass immigration that threatens to overwhelm and replace us. We must stop the multiculturalism that dilutes and divides us. We must stop the censorship and propaganda that silences and brainwashes us. Likewise, we must stop the tyranny and oppression that threaten to enslave and destroy us.

We have every right to preserve our identity, culture, and sovereignty. We have a right to defend our liberty, freedom, and human rights. Likewise, we have a right to secure our future and our children’s future.

 

Quatrain 3 – Barry’s Secret Army

In the shadows of time, behold as Barry's secret army, akin to a Trojan steed, breaches the Southern Gateway. A multitude of 100,000 souls concealed amidst the labyrinthine streets of New York, bides its moment, awaiting the celestial decree to unveil their assault upon the core of the Big Apple from its very heart. ~ The Modern Nostradamus


In the shadows of time, behold as Barry’s secret army, akin to a Trojan steed, breaches the Southern Gateway. A multitude of 100,000 souls concealed amidst the labyrinthine streets of New York, bides its moment, awaiting the celestial decree to unveil their assault upon the core of the Big Apple from its very heart. ~ The Modern Nostradamus

 

Quatrain 2 – An Apocalyptic Maelstrom

In the shadowy realm, a cabal of mysterious figures shall unfurl the grand tapestry of a global dominion, ushering forth an apocalyptic maelstrom. Meanwhile, the masses, ensnared by handheld contrivances, shall remain oblivious, like moths captivated by ephemeral flames. ~ The Modern Nostradamus


In the shadowy realm, a cabal of mysterious figures shall unfurl the grand tapestry of a global dominion, ushering forth an apocalyptic maelstrom. Meanwhile, the masses, ensnared by handheld contrivances, shall remain oblivious, like moths captivated by ephemeral flames. ~ The Modern Nostradamus

 

The Benefits of World Hunger – United Nations

The article “The Benefits of World Hunger” was written by George Kent, a retired professor of political science at the University of Hawaii, and was originally published in the UN Chronicle in 2008. The article argued that hunger is not an issue to be solved, rather “it is fundamental to the working of the world’s economy”. The article sparked outrage among Twitter users and was taken down from the UN Chronicle website. After criticism of the article, UN Chronicle tried to say that the 14-year-old article was “an attempt at satire”. However, Kent himself denies that the article was intended as a form of satire. In an interview with Climate Depot, Kent explains he was not advocating global hunger but was intending to be “provocative” by saying certain individuals and institutions benefit from global hunger.

The original article:

The article “The Benefits of World Hunger” was written by George Kent, a retired professor of political science at the University of Hawaii, and was originally published in the UN Chronicle in 2008. The article argued that hunger is not an issue to be solved, rather “it is fundamental to the working of the world’s economy”.



Load More