Trump Assassination Attempt In Reno Was Pre-Planned To Make Trump Supporters Violent

fearless
Fearless – This is the face of a man who will never back down.

What happened last night was pre-planned to make Trump look like the bad guy and Trump supporters violent, but it backfired.

Here’s why:
In the video below you can see the journalists go along with the narrative they were given by the Clinton campaign, they were ready to make this story into “Trump supporters BRUTALLY ASSAULT protester at Nevada rally”; they had their prepared lines, “Trump incites violence” “This is all his fault” etc.

What they didn’t count on were two things:

1 – Somebody shouting “GUN!” and Trump being rushed off stage by the SS, which made everything look like an assassination attempt more than anything else.

2 – Trump supporters keeping the slimey CNN cameraman from getting close to the action as seen here so he was unable to get good shots of the man being hit by supporters/police, which was supposed to make him look like the victim (despite Wikileaks proof of him working for the DNC).

The original script was ruined by these two occurrences, that’s why the journalists’ narration of the incident sounds so contrived and counter-intuitive.

The videos were supposed to paint Trump as the culprit, instead they show Trump as the victim of an assassination attempt. Never mind the guy didn’t have a gun, that’s irrelevant: when people see the images from what happened it looks 100% like a genuine assassination attempt, no amount of talk from the journalists can change that.

This was supposed to be the last big hit on Trump, instead he came off looking once again like Donald Reagan, and the MSM as complete liars. Thanks KeK, crisis averted.

Edit: I meant Ronald Reagan, not Donald Reagan. Freudian slip? :D

Keep this in mind. Trump continued the rally after a credible assassination attempt. Hillary cut her rally to 7 minutes because of RAIN.

 
via

New Wikileaks Release: Inside ‘Bill Clinton Inc.’

A 2011 memo made public by Wikileaks revealed details of how Bill Clinton made tens of millions of dollars for himself and Hillary through an opaque, ethically messy amalgam of philanthropic, business and personal activities.

God bless Wikileaks. They’re doing the job the State-Run media won’t do.

When top Bill Clinton aide Douglas Band wrote the memo, he was a central player at the Clinton Foundation and president of his own corporate consulting firm. Over the course of 13 pages, he made a case that his multiple roles had served the interests of the Clinton family and its charity.

In doing so, Band also detailed a circle of enrichment in which he raised money for the Clinton Foundation from top-tier corporations such as Dow Chemical and Coca-Cola that were clients of his firm, Teneo, while pressing many of those same donors to provide personal income to the former president.

The system has drawn scrutiny from Republicans, who say it allowed corporations and other wealthy supporters to pay for entree to a popular former president and a onetime secretary of state who is now the Democratic presidential nominee.

Band wrote the memo in 2011 to foundation lawyers conducting a review of the organization amid a brewing feud with the Clintons’ daughter, Chelsea Clinton, who was taking a stronger role in leading the foundation and had expressed concerns about Teneo’s operations.

Read more…

 
Source…

Load More