When the entire web is finally brought into the light, there is NO doubt we will see clearly the spider sitting in the middle of it all…
Lerner, Lynch, Holder, Rosenstein, Yates, Page, Comey, McCabe, Ohr, Strzok, Clinton, Rice, and the list goes on and on. Each an individual strand of corruption alone, but together a web that encompasses the entire Administrative Branch under Obama.
Each time a little more of the darkness is discovered we see more and more how the strands intersect and connect, creating a web of corruption like none before seen in the Administrative Branch of the United States.
The LEFT frantically attempts to downplay any strand; trying desperately to divert the public’s attention… Their TRUE fear is that the entire web will see the light of day and there will no longer be any way to hide the spider sitting in the middle.
That will be the day that Washington’s Governing Elite and its scheme for domination and control will end.
This is an absolute BOMBSHELL and needs more coverage: VP of Facebook Ads, Rob Goldman says majority of Russian ads were AFTER THE ELECTION and calls out the Mainstream Media for not covering it.
Facebook vice president of advertising Rob Goldman slammed the media, on Twitter, for their misleading coverage of Russia’s meddling in American politics.
“Very excited to see the Mueller indictment today. We shared Russian ads with Congress, Mueller and the American people to help the public understand how the Russians abused our system. Still, there are keys facts about the Russian actions that are still not well understood”
“Most of the coverage of Russian meddling involves their attempt to effect the outcome of the 2016 US election. I have seen all of the Russian ads and I can say very definitively that swaying the election was *NOT* the main goal”
“The majority of the Russian ad spend happened AFTER the election. We shared that fact, but very few outlets have covered it because it doesn’t align with the main media narrative of Trump and the election”
Very excited to see the Mueller indictment today. We shared Russian ads with Congress, Mueller and the American people to help the public understand how the Russians abused our system. Still, there are keys facts about the Russian actions that are still not well understood.
The majority of the Russian ad spend happened AFTER the election. We shared that fact, but very few outlets have covered it because it doesn’t align with the main media narrative of Tump and the election. https://t.co/2dL8Kh0hof
“I have seen all of the Russian ads and I can say very definitively that swaying the election was *NOT* the main goal.” Rob Goldman Vice President of Facebook Ads https://t.co/A5ft7cGJkE
Newly disclosed texts between Peter Strzok and Lisa Page were exchanged on September 2, 2016. In the text exchange, Page writes to Strzok about preparing talking points for FBI Director James Comey because, “potus wants to know everything we’re doing.” This text raises questions about Obama’s personal involvement in the Clinton email investigation.
We all thought Obama was not supposed to be involved at all in the Clinton email investigation.
Newly revealed text messages between FBI paramours Peter Strzok and Lisa Page include an exchange about preparing talking points for then-FBI Director James Comey to give to President Obama, who wanted “to know everything we’re doing.”
The message, from Page to Strzok, was among thousands of texts between the lovers reviewed by Fox News. The pair both worked at one point for Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s probe of alleged collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia.
Page wrote to Strzok on Sept. 2, 2016 about prepping Comey because, “potus wants to know everything we’re doing.” Senate investigators told Fox News this text raises questions about President Obama’s personal involvement in the Clinton email investigation.
Why nothing, other than the FBI publishing documents relating to its investigation into Hillary Clinton’s use of private email while serving as Secretary of State.
If there’s anything to take away from this, it’s that Peter Strzok is an incredibly stupid person. You would have to be a complete idiot to discuss a criminal conspiracy involving top people in the Democrat Party and the intelligence agencies to overthrow the people’s democratically elected government on a personal phone, but to do it on a government phone? Strzok and Page’s stupidity are going to take them all down.
The House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence issues the “FISA MEMO: CHARGE AND RESPONSE” document to answer the major Mainstream Media and Democrat attacks on it.
The response to all charges against the memo, further cementing its validity and destroying all of the Left’s arguments.
A clear and powerful rebuttal to the attacks!
This needs to be shared far and wide.
CHARGE: The Majority failed to comply with House and Committee Rules. RESPONSE: All House and Committee rules were complied with and followed, as prescribed, from the requirement to notice a business meeting, to make available classified executive session material to the House, and to publically disclose the material. i
CHARGE: The memo is intended to undermine the Special Counsel’s ongoing Russia investigation. RESPONSE: The memo has nothing to do with the Special Counsel’s investigation, and is intended to expose past abuses of the FISA process, namely Senior DOJ and FBI officials’ use of unverified opposition research. That research was financed by a presidential candidate, Hillary Clinton, and resulted in a surveillance warrant on an American citizen. Further, consistent with its bipartisan commitment not to impede any ongoing investigation, the Committee has not sought documents or information post-dating the appointment of the Special Counsel in May 2017.
CHARGE: The memo is intended to undermine DOJ and FBI. RESPONSE: The memo is intended to hold some senior DOJ and FBI officials accountable for abuses of the FISA process, consistent with the Committee’s constitutional responsibilities. The Committee has not only the right, but the responsibility, to conduct rigorous oversight of potential abuses—including by making information publicly available— on behalf of the American people.
CHARGE: The memo is intended to undermine the men and women of DOJ and FBI. RESPONSE: The memo is focused on abuses by a small number of senior leaders. The Committee’s fulfillment of its constitutional duty supports the hard working men and women of law enforcement and the intelligence community by enabling effective, efficient and constitutional oversight of their agencies.
CHARGE: The memo unfairly targets government officials like Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein and former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe. RESPONSE: This is patently false. The memo simply states that Deputy Attorney General Rosenstein and former FBI Deputy Director McCabe were among the senior DOJ and FBI officials who signed off on a FISA application that included, as a substantial and essential part, the DNC and Clinton campaign-funded Steele dossier.
CHARGE: The memo undermines recently-reauthorized FISA Section 702. RESPONSE: The memo has nothing to do with Section 702, which targets foreigners located overseas. As specified in the memo, the FISA order authorizing surveillance on Carter Page was not obtained under Title VII.
CHARGE: DOJ and FBI did nothing wrong by using the Steele dossier in a FISA application. RESPONSE: DOJ and FBI senior leaders had four separate opportunities, but failed each time, to adequately investigate or disclose to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC) the role of the DNC and Clinton campaign as the funders and beneficiaries of the Steele dossier—even though its political origins were known to numerous senior DOJ and FBI officials. Additionally, FBI’s reliance on Steele’s past credibility was misplaced, since he concealed from the FBI unauthorized media contacts with numerous outlets and his anti-Trump bias, which was known by a senior DOJ official.
CHARGE: The memo, and DOJ and FBI’s use of the Steele dossier in a FISA application, are no big deal. RESPONSE: It is important for the American people to judge the facts presented in the memo, which Members of the Committee and House assessed to be of substantial public interest. But it is simply astonishing that Democrats would argue the memo is insignificant given the extreme lengths they went to prevent its release.
CHARGE: The memo is nothing more than a collection of partisan talking points. RESPONSE: The memo is the result of a nearly year long investigative effort by the Committee, including document review and witness interviews. As the public can see, it sets forth a series of facts uncovered by Committee investigators in the face of attempts efforts by senior DOJ and FBI officials to stonewall the Committee’s, and contains no partisan rhetoric or personal attacks.
CHARGE: The memo represents an irresponsible release of highly-sensitive classified information. RESPONSE: The complaints from the left about Congress doing its job, and Democrats’ sudden opposition to transparency, represent a hypocritical and partisan attempt to prevent the public from learning about the memo’s contents. Contrary to unauthorized leaks of classified information so prevalent in Washington today, the memo’s release occurred pursuant to the Committee’s oversight function and a process laid out in House Rules that balances the public and national interests. Some have falsely claimed that the memo contains “an immense amount of classified information.” However, it was specifically crafted to exclude information that might damage national security and has now been declassified following an executive branch review. This authorized, limited release of formerly classified information serves the public interest, and the only “source or method” specifically mentioned is Christopher Steele—who was terminated as an FBI source for unauthorized disclosures to the press.
CHARGE: It is irresponsible to release the memo over DOJ and FBI’s objections. RESPONSE: It is disappointing that senior officials at DOJ and FBI would continue to attempt to obstruct the Committee’s efforts to share with the American people information related to surveillance abuses at these agencies. The Committee notes that both DOJ and FBI—along with other stakeholders—had an opportunity to provide input into the executive branch review process, which resulted in the President’s decision to declassify the document in full.
CHARGE: DOJ and FBI had good reason to suspect Carter Page of being a Russian agent. RESPONSE: While many unverified claims have been made by both Christopher Steele and Committee Democrats, the focus of the memo is not Carter Page. The focus of the memo is the Steele dossier—funded by the DNC and Clinton campaign, and described as “salacious and unverified” by former FBI Director Comey—that formed a substantial and essential part of a secret court application for a warrant on an American citizen.
CHARGE: According to FBI, there are “material omissions of fact that fundamentally impact the memo’s accuracy.” RESPONSE: No one, including the FBI officials who reviewed the memo, has identified any factual errors, and the Committee encourages DOJ and FBI to make publicly available, to the greatest extent possible, documents in those agencies’ possession that would shed additional light on the abuses uncovered by the Committee. Also, the memo does not purport to be exhaustive: it is focused on DOJ and FBI’s use of the DNC- and Clinton campaign-funded Steele dossier to obtain a warrant on an American citizen.
CHARGE: Most members have not reviewed the documents underlying the memo. RESPONSE: As part of stonewalling the Committee’s investigation, senior officials at DOJ and FBI initially placed burdensome and unreasonable restrictions on the Committee’s access to documents responsive to its subpoenas. Chairman Nunes designated Chairman Gowdy, an experienced prosecutor and investigator, to lead the Committee’s review. All Republican members participated in weekly briefings on the results of the Committee’s investigative efforts, and the Committee does not believe there are—or should be—current restrictions on the Committee’s access to this important information.
CHARGE: The memo’s release violated an agreement with DOJ. RESPONSE: DOJ and FBI placed no limits on disseminating the information made available to the Committee which—contrary to false claims—is not highly classified or limited to the so-called “Gang of 8.”
CHARGE: The Committee drafted the memo in coordination with the White House. RESPONSE: This is patently false. No one outside the Committee played any role in drafting or compiling the memo. The Committee had no communications with the White House about the contents of the memo until after the Committee voted to make it publicly available, and it was transmitted to the President’s representatives in accordance with House rules.
CHARGE: The memo was materially altered after the Committee’s vote to make it public. RESPONSE: The Committee’s vote to release the memo was procedurally sound, and in accordance with House and Committee Rules. The version transmitted to the White House included minor edits, made before the Committee voted to make the memo public, to the version previously made available to all members of the House. The minor edits included technical and grammatical changes, along with the deletion of one piece of information in response to FBI’s last-minute suggestion—which was in accordance with national security protocols, but had no bearing on the memo’s substance. The memo also includes a more precise characterization of the FISA application’s use of a Yahoo News article, in response to feedback from Committee Democrats. Complaints about these edits from Committee Democrats—none of whom voted to release any version of the memo—represent the latest example of the minority’s consistent efforts to obstruct the Committee’s efforts to collect and share information about FISA abuses. The minority opposed all efforts to obtain the underlying documents, including issuing subpoenas for them in August 2017.
CHARGE: The Committee blocked release of the Democrats’ memo. RESPONSE: The Committee elected to follow the same process and timing for the Majority and Minority memos by first making each available for all members of the House to review. The Majority voted unanimously to make the Minority’s memo available to all House members, even though all Democrats voted against making the Majority’s memo similarly available. The Committee is planning a business meeting next week to address the Minority’s memo, and is soliciting feedback from Members of both parties who have reviewed it.
