Lee Harvey Oswald Archives - Common Sense Evaluation

What Ever Happened to the Gun Used to Assassinate JFK?

June 4, 2024May 28, 2024 gags

The assassination of President John F. Kennedy in 1963 remains one of the most puzzling and debated events in American history. From the moment the shots rang out in Dealey Plaza, theories about what truly happened have captivated the public. Central to many of these theories is the weapon purportedly used to kill JFK: a Mannlicher-Carcano rifle. While the official story places this rifle in the hands of Lee Harvey Oswald, some researchers argue that the gun displayed in the National Archives today is nothing but a replica. So, what really happened to the gun used to assassinate JFK?

The Official Story

According to the Warren Commission, the official body that investigated the assassination, Lee Harvey Oswald fired three shots from the sixth floor of the Texas School Book Depository. The weapon identified was an Italian-made Mannlicher-Carcano rifle. This rifle, bearing the serial number C2766, was found on the sixth floor of the depository shortly after the assassination. Oswald, who was apprehended later that day, allegedly ordered this rifle via mail using an alias.

The rifle, along with other pieces of evidence, was thoroughly examined and eventually stored in the National Archives in Washington, D.C. For many, this is where the story ends. However, the world of conspiracy theories suggests a different narrative.

The Replica Theory

Several investigators claim that the rifle currently on display in the National Archives is not the original. They argue that the gun in the archives is a replica, crafted to replace the original, which either vanished or was intentionally hidden. This theory hinges on numerous pieces of supposed evidence and anomalies.

Firstly, theorizers point to inconsistencies in the appearance of the rifle. Some claim that photographs and descriptions of the gun taken in 1963 differ from those of the rifle stored in the archives today. Differences in the wood grain pattern, the condition of the metal parts, and even the scope’s alignment are often cited as proof that the original rifle was swapped out.

The Mysterious Disappearance

One popular theory suggests that the original rifle disappeared shortly after the assassination. Some believe it was stolen, while others argue it was removed as part of a cover-up. If the real rifle could implicate a more complex conspiracy or reveal additional shooters, it would make sense for those behind the plot to replace it with a replica.

There are whispers that individuals connected to the case, perhaps even within the government or law enforcement, played a role in the rifle’s disappearance. These individuals might have had access to evidence rooms and the ability to alter records, facilitating the swap.

The Fingerprint Evidence

Another controversial point is the fingerprint evidence. In 1998, a re-examination of the evidence by fingerprint expert A. Nathan Darby found a palm print on the rifle that matched Oswald’s. However, some argue this print was planted or discovered under suspicious circumstances. They suggest that the existence of this print, and its delayed discovery, adds weight to the idea that the original rifle was tampered with or replaced.

The Role of the National Archives

The National Archives plays a critical role in this mystery. As the official repository for key pieces of evidence from the JFK assassination, it is supposed to ensure the preservation and authenticity of the items it holds. But skeptics question the security measures and protocols in place during the 1960s and 1970s. They argue that the chaotic and politically charged environment of the time might have allowed for a swap to go unnoticed.

Furthermore, the National Archives has been criticized for its handling of other historical artifacts, lending some credence to the idea that something as significant as the JFK assassination rifle could be mishandled or swapped.

Counterarguments and Skepticism

Of course, it’s essential to consider counterarguments. Many experts and historians maintain that the rifle in the National Archives is the original. They argue that the perceived inconsistencies in the rifle’s appearance can be attributed to photographic angles, lighting, and the natural aging process of materials. They also point out that extensive documentation and chain-of-custody records support the rifle’s authenticity.

However, conspiracy theorists remain unconvinced. They argue that any official records or testimonies could have been manipulated as part of a larger cover-up. For them, the lack of definitive, irrefutable proof means that questions will always linger.

Why It Matters

The debate over the rifle’s authenticity might seem like a minor detail in the grand scheme of the JFK assassination. However, it touches on broader themes of trust in government, transparency, and the pursuit of truth. For those who believe in a conspiracy, the alleged replica rifle symbolizes the lengths to which powerful entities will go to maintain their narrative and conceal the truth.

Moreover, the mystery of the rifle represents the enduring fascination with JFK’s assassination. Every new theory, every piece of disputed evidence, keeps the public engaged and ensures that the questions surrounding that fateful day in Dallas remain alive.

Final Thoughts

The question of what happened to the gun used to assassinate JFK is a microcosm of the larger mystery that shrouds his death. While the official story places the Mannlicher-Carcano rifle in the hands of Lee Harvey Oswald and now in the National Archives, conspiracy theorists offer a different narrative—one of deception, disappearance, and replicas.

Whether you believe the rifle in the National Archives is the original or a cleverly crafted replica, the debate itself underscores the lasting impact of JFK’s assassination on American culture and history. The quest for truth continues, and with it, the theories and speculations that keep this historic enigma alive.

Conspiracy Featured Political Videos

The Jack Ruby Connection: The LBJ Conspiracy in the JFK Assassination

November 13, 2023November 12, 2023 gags

The tragic assassination of President John F. Kennedy remains shrouded in a web of mysteries and conspiracies in the annals of American history. One pivotal figure in this mystery is Jack Ruby, the man who, on live television, shot Lee Harvey Oswald, the alleged assassin of JFK. What unfolded in that chaotic moment, as Ruby pulled the trigger, has since fueled speculations and theories, with some suggesting a deeper conspiracy involving then-Vice President Lyndon B. Johnson (LBJ). Let’s look into the cryptic testimony of Jack Ruby, explore the shadows that hint at a connection between Ruby’s actions and a larger conspiracy involving LBJ, and unravel the mystery surrounding Ruby’s own demise.

The Man Behind the Trigger

Jack Ruby, a nightclub owner with connections in the Dallas underworld, became an unexpected protagonist in the aftermath of Kennedy’s assassination. On November 24, 1963, just days after JFK’s death, Ruby shot Oswald in the basement of the Dallas Police Department. The public spectacle of this act, broadcasted on live television, marked a surreal twist in the already surreal narrative surrounding Kennedy’s murder.

Ruby’s motives for killing Oswald have been a subject of intense scrutiny. While the official explanation proposes that Ruby acted out of grief and a sense of justice, there are tantalizing hints that his actions might have been influenced by forces beyond a simple desire for retribution.

Unraveling Ruby’s Testimony

In the aftermath of the shooting, Jack Ruby faced legal proceedings that sought to uncover the motives behind his impulsive act. During the trial, Ruby’s testimony unfolded like a cryptic script, leaving breadcrumbs that hinted at a deeper narrative.

One notable moment occurred when Ruby was asked about his motivation for shooting Oswald. Instead of providing a straightforward answer, Ruby’s response hinted at a larger conspiracy. He alluded to being a pawn in a game orchestrated by powerful figures, suggesting that he was not acting alone.

The LBJ Connection

The most intriguing aspect of Ruby’s cryptic testimony revolves around his subtle references to Lyndon B. Johnson. While not explicitly implicating LBJ, Ruby’s words and demeanor during the trial raise questions about the extent of Johnson’s involvement in the events surrounding Kennedy’s assassination.

Ruby’s insinuations about being a mere cog in a larger machine aligned with theories circulating at the time that LBJ might have had a motive to eliminate JFK. Some theorists argue that Johnson, eager to ascend to the presidency, had a hand in orchestrating Kennedy’s demise. Ruby’s cryptic testimony adds fuel to this speculative fire.

Jack Ruby Implicates LBJ in JFK’s Assassination:

Connecting the Dots

To understand the potential LBJ connection, we must examine the political climate of the era. Lyndon B. Johnson, a skilled political operator, had ambitions that reached beyond the vice presidency. Some theorists argue that Johnson, fearing exclusion from the political spotlight, may have sought to eliminate JFK to pave his way to the presidency.

Ruby’s cryptic remarks about being a pawn in a larger game align with the notion that powerful forces were at play behind the scenes. While these theories fall short of providing concrete evidence, they underscore the lingering doubts and suspicions surrounding the official narrative of Kennedy’s assassination.

Unanswered Questions

Decades after these events, questions surrounding Jack Ruby’s true motivations persist. The perplexity of his cryptic testimony, coupled with the persistent whispers of a larger conspiracy involving LBJ, leaves the door wide open for alternative narratives and theories.

The legacy of that fateful day in Dallas continues to be a tapestry of uncertainties and unexplored avenues. Jack Ruby’s role, once considered a mere footnote in the larger narrative, emerges as a pivotal piece in the puzzle that is the Kennedy assassination.

Ruby’s Mysterious Demise

Adding another layer of intrigue to the narrative is the mysterious death of Jack Ruby. While in prison awaiting a new trial, Ruby succumbed to a sudden and fatal illness on January 3, 1967. His death, just three years after the shooting of Oswald, fueled speculation that Ruby might have been silenced to prevent him from revealing more about the events surrounding Kennedy’s assassination.

Digging into the details of Ruby’s death, the official cause listed on the death certificate was pulmonary embolism, a condition where a blood clot lodges in the lungs, leading to respiratory failure. However, the circumstances of Ruby’s sudden illness and the rapid progression of his demise have sparked skepticism and fueled conspiracy theories.

Questions linger regarding the timing and nature of Ruby’s illness. Was it a mere coincidence, or did it serve a darker purpose? Some theorists suggest that Ruby’s death may have been orchestrated to silence a potential informant, raising doubts about the official narrative surrounding his demise.

Conclusion

In the dark corridors of history, the shadows of doubt and suspicion persist. Jack Ruby’s cryptic testimony, when viewed through the lens of a potential LBJ connection, adds layers of intrigue to an already complex narrative. While concrete evidence remains elusive, the echoes of that moment in the Dallas Police Department basement reverberate, inviting us to peer into the shadows and question the veracity of the official story. As we continue to unravel the mysteries of the past, the mystery of Jack Ruby’s actions, the potential involvement of Lyndon B. Johnson, and the mystery surrounding Ruby’s own demise remain as elusive and compelling as ever.

Political

JFK Murder Plot “Deathbed Confession” Aired On National Radio

March 21, 2017November 11, 2023 gags

Former CIA agent, Watergate conspirator E. Howard Hunt names the men who killed Kennedy

The “deathbed confession” audio tape in which former CIA agent and Watergate conspirator E. Howard Hunt admits he was approached to be part of a CIA assassination team to kill JFK. It is an astounding development that has gone completely ignored by the establishment media.

Saint John Hunt, son of E. Howard Hunt, appeared on the nationally syndicated Coast to Coast Live radio show in April 2007 to discuss the revelations contained in the tape.

Hunt said that his father had mailed the cassette the tape to him alone in January 2004 and asked that it be released after his death. The tape was originally 20 minutes long but was edited down to four and a half minutes for the Coast to Coast broadcast.

Below is the audio clip of the tape:

E. Howard Hunt names numerous individuals with both direct and indirect CIA connections as having played a role in the assassination of Kennedy, while describing himself as a “bench warmer” in the plot. Saint John Hunt agreed that the use of this term indicates that Hunt was willing to play a larger role in the murder conspiracy had he been required.

Hunt alleges on the tape that then Vice President Lyndon B. Johnson was involved in the planning of the assassination and in the cover-up, stating that LBJ, “Had an almost maniacal urge to become president, he regarded JFK as an obstacle to achieving that.”

The three tramps arrested in the wake of the Kennedy assassination have long been suspected of being conspirators

Asked if his father followed the conspiracy theories about the Kennedy assassination, Saint John said the elder Hunt did follow the work of AJ Weberman, a New York freelance writer, who in the early 70s first accused Hunt of being one of three bums who were arrested in Dealy Plaza. The so-called bums (pictured above) were interrogated and later released by authorities shortly after the assassination. Weberman, one of the founders of the Youth International Party, the Vippies, published photographs of the tramps and found that two of them bore striking similarities to Hunt and Frank Sturgis, also named by Hunt in the tape as having been played a role in the assassination conspiracy.

Asked for his opinion whether his father was indeed one of the Dealy Plaza tramps, Saint John, in a stunning revelation, said one of the tramps indeed looked much like his father did in 1963 (see comparison above).

CIA operative Frank Stugis’ striking resemblance to one of the “tramps”.

Other researchers believe the “Hunt tramp” to really be Chauncey Holt, who apparently later confessed to the fact. Charles Harrelson was allegedly identified as the third tramp.

Saint John Hunt said that shortly before his death, his father had felt “deeply conflicted and deeply remorseful” that he didn’t blow the whistle on the plot at the time and prevent the assassination, but that everyone in the government hated Kennedy and wanted him gone in one way or another. Kennedy’s promise to “shatter the CIA into a thousand pieces and scatter the remnants to the wind” was being carried out and this infuriated almost everyone at the agency.

Hunt also said that his mother’s death in a December 8, 1972, plane crash in Chicago was suspicious and that there was evidence of a White House cover-up surrounding the circumstances of the alleged accident.

Investigators discovered $10,000 dollars in her luggage and Hunt alleged that his mother traveled around the country using Nixon campaign money to pay off the families of the Watergate burglars to keep them quiet about the involvement of the Nixon White House in the Watergate break-in and cover-up.

Hunt cited numerous coincidences surrounding the aftermath of the crash, including Nixon’s appointment of his henchman, Egil Krough, to the National Transportation Safety Board which investigates plane crashes, the very day after the incident.

Eyewitnesses reported that the plane exploded above treetop level before it had even hit the runway.

Hunt said that “at least 20-25 FBI members,” as well as numerous DIA agents were at the scene of the crash within minutes before rescue personnel had even arrived, and that this fact was attested to in a letter sent by the head of the Chicago FBI to investigator Sherman Skolnick.

Hunt said that his safety was guaranteed by the dissemination of the tape and that he had several copies and had mailed others to addresses both abroad and in the U.S.

“Once this information is out, there’s really no point in anyone trying to do me in or do me wrong – someone may try to discredit me, but I have no skeletons in my closet,” said Hunt.

As we have previously reported, the night before the Kennedy assassination, Lyndon Baines Johnson met with Dallas tycoons, FBI moguls and organized crime kingpins – emerging from the conference to tell his mistress Madeleine Duncan Brown that “those SOB’s” would never embarrass him again.

Though Brown first went public on her 21-year relationship with Johnson in the early 80s, to this day her shocking revelations about how he had told her the Kennedy’s “would never embarrass me again” the night before the assassination are often ignored by the media who prefer to keep the debate focused on issues which can’t definitively be proven either way (or at least can be spun and whitewashed).

George Herbert Walker Bush was also pictured at the scene of the crime in Dealy Plaza.

In addition, Barr McClellan, father of former White House press secretary Scott McClellan and a partner in the Austin law firm that represented Johnson, wrote in his 2003 book that LBJ was a key player in the organization of the assassination and its cover-up. McClellan’s revelations were the subject of a subsequent History Channel documentary called The Guilty Men.

The Most Revealing Wink Of The 20th Century

Congressman Albert Thomas winks back at a quickly-smiling LBJ as he is being sworn in to be the next President of the United States on Air Force One while the grief-stricken Jackie Kennedy stands next to him.