Tag: Election 2016
Flashback: Hillary Clinton; “Some People Are Sore Losers”
Remember this?
“To say you won’t respect the results of the election — that is a direct threat to our Democracy. The peaceful transfer of power is one of the things that makes America, America. And look, some people are sore losers, and we just got to keep going.” ~ Hillary Clinton Charlotte, North Carolina October 23, 2016
Not accepting the results of the election is “a direct threat to our Democracy!” Because fixing the election against Bernie Sanders was an homage to Democracy, right?
And can somebody tell Hillary to read the Pledge of Allegiance. America is not a Democracy. America is a Republic.
Shoot The Panda
Shoot the panda – 5 months before the Seth Rich murder!An article from Vanity Fair January 24, 2016 titled Hillary Clinton Cannot Be Stopped contains an eerie reference to “Shoot the Panda”. There is more evidence in this article that Hillary Clinton and the DNC murdered Seth Rich than there is that Trump colluded with Russia. Where is the Special Prosecutor looking into this? I’m just sayin’. Panda was Seth Rich’s nickname. |
HRC Camp Plotted To Smear Trump For A Putin “Bromance” Way Back In 2015
Is this the SMOKING GUN in the Trump Russia Fake News narrative?
A Wikileaks email shows that Hillary Clinton’s campaign team was advised to link Russian President Vladimir Putin with Donald Trump in an apparent bid to distract voters from her strategy on ISIS.
The exchange of emails between Clinton campaign chair John Podesta and Clinton ally and columnist Brent Budowsky was among the batch of around 1,000 emails from Podesta’s account released by WikiLeaks on October 22, 2016.
In a December 21, 2015 email, Budowsky criticizes Clinton’s position on fighting ISIS before advising Podesta to draw Putin into her attacks on Donald Trump.
Wikileaks Email ID 25621 Brent Budowsky advises Podesta – to smear Trump with a Putin “Bromance”:
Budowsky’s email follows a discussion with Podesta on how to best position the former secretary of state on the issue of tackling ISIS.
Budowsky warns that Clinton is not coming down strongly enough on fighting ISIS and that her support for Obama’s approach is a potential “death ray to her candidacy in a general election.”
“Walk back and escape from her statement that ‘finally we are where we need to be’ against ISIS. We are not where we need to be, we are far from it, most voters do not believe it, and when the next terror attack comes in America – which it certainly will – she will be branded in hot iron with that statement,” Budowski warns.
“She will never state what I believe we need to do – at least 20,000 ground troops with 3,000 American and at least 10,000 from Sunni Muslim nations – because she is consumed with keeping Obama’s goodwill and afraid of liberal backlash.”
Podesta counters: “Her reference was not to ISIS but to going after Assad diplomatically because of UNSC resolution passed Friday. We will make that clear. She has given two major speeches about how we are NOT where we need to be on ISIS.”
“That’s good, sooner it’s clarified the better, and the stronger the better,” Budowski replies, later adding: “Best approach is to slaughter Donald for his bromance with Putin, but not go too far betting on Putin re Syria.”
It's pretty clear that Vladimir Putin would rather have a puppet in the White House than a president. #DebateNight
— Hillary Clinton (@HillaryClinton) October 20, 2016