Democrats Fabricated “Russia Hacked The DNC” To Justify Spying On Trump

 Political  Comments Off on Democrats Fabricated “Russia Hacked The DNC” To Justify Spying On Trump
Mar 052017
 

They started setting Trump up as soon as the primaries were over.

Democrats Fabricated "Russia Hacked The DNC" To Justify Spying On Trump

The FISA request to spy on Trump was originally filed in June 2016. The Wikileaks of the DNC hacked emails were released July 22, 2016. The entire “Russia hacked the DNC” story was created to justify DNC spying on Trump before the election.

Look at the timeline:

May 26, Trump reaches enough delegates to unofficially win Republican Presidential nomination.

June 2016, FISA request rejected against Trump.

July 22, 2016 Wikileaks releases the emails against the DNC.

August 2016, DNC claims the emails are Russian propaganda and some are fake with the goal of harming Hillary Clinton’s Presidency.

The media runs with this story, this creates suspicion against Trump to suggest that Russia is trying to influence the election.

October a month before the election, another FISA request is accepted. This time because of “probable cause” no evidence actually needing to be required.

This allows the current federal government to spy on a Presidential candidate a month before the election, one who is a part of the opposing political party ( while Obama himself is actively campaigning with Hillary and the DOJ is working to help Hillary pass her investigation with no issues ).

The plan the Democrats had for the election was to rig it for Hillary by using dirty tactics by the Mainstream Media to destroy Bernie’s chance and to make Trump look bad, and also to potentially spy on him to find negative stories to run in the month lead up to the election. They were probably hoping to leak audio clips of Trump having private conversations saying politically incorrect things, like how they had the hot mic tape of him saying “grab her by the pussy” and used that to find 15+ random women to claim that he sexually assaulted them a few weeks before the election.

A more comprehensive timeline put together by a user a Reddit:

Obama creates office of Chief Technology Officer – Aneesh Chopra ties to Tim Kaine/Terry McAuliffe (DNC Virginia strategy), Todd Park (Healthcare.gov fiasco), Megan Smith (VP Google X)

10 Oct 2012 – Directive 19 (Protect whistleblowers just before election – failsafe?)

==2013== New term. Uranium One, wiretapping (journalists/Merkel/France), slush fund projects, BLM, ISIS rebranded / Syria mobilization, Euromaidan (Ukraine)

2014 – Fancy Bear attacks Germany, Ukraine. (coincidence?)

19 Mar 2015 – Obama appoints David Recordon (Facebook) as White House IT director.

8 April 2015 – Fancy Bear (ISIS fakeout) attacks France. (coincidence?)

16 June 2015 – Trump enters presidential race.

?? June 2016 – FISA request – denied.

7 June 2016 – Final GOP primary.

14 June 2016 – Reported that DNC servers hacked (after “one year” – coincides with Trump entering race – setup begins). Research dossier on Trump stolen, Hillary campaign data untouched. Peskov denies Russian interference.

15 June 2016 – CrowdStrike (Russian expat Dmitri Alperovitch ties to Atlantic Council) blames Fancy Bear(coincidence?)

6 Jul 2016 – Senate bill to revoke Hillary security clearance.

11 Jul 2016 – House bill to revoke Hillary security clearance.

22 Jul 2016 – Wikileaks – Hillary.

7 Oct 2016 – Wikileaks – Podesta. Press release.

9 Oct 2016 – Trump campaign alleges Clinton ties to Russia.

12 Oct 2016 – Putin denies hacking.

15 Oct 2016 – FISA warrant issued.

19 Oct 2016 – Hillary calls Trump a puppet at final presidential debate. (Civilian – who is leaking her information?)

20 Oct 2016 – Esquire details hacking operation.

31 Oct 2016 – FBI: No direct link to Trump.

24 Nov 2016 – Scary Russian trolls! (CTR/Shareblue?)

10 Jan 2017 – Trump intelligence allegations dossier “leaked”. (Dates curious – reports follow damaging press – retaliation?)

11 Jan 2017 – Clapper denies dossier came from IC.

12 Jan 2017 – Obama modifies E.O. 12333. (Another fail-safe?)

Isn’t it amazing how quickly the Mainstream Media ran and accepted the Russian narrative? Almost like they were fed orders for it and didn’t care how no connection to Russia existed.

Previously:
Loretta Lynch’s Final Order Allows The NSA To Give Spying Data To Other Federal Agencies
Hillary Set Up The ‘Russian Hack’ Excuse During The Debates
In 2013 Obama Legalized The Use Of Propaganda On The US Public

 

President Trump: Obama Wire Tapped Trump Tower

 Political, Quotes  1 Response »
Mar 042017
 
President Trump accuses Obama of overseeing ‘Nixon/Watergate’ style intervention

President Trump: Obama Wire Tapped Trump Tower
Donald Trump has accused Barack Obama of “wire tapping” his offices in New York City before the presidential election in November last year.

Launching a series of tweets at 5.35am eastern time on Saturday morning, the US president said: “Terrible! Just found out that Obama had my ‘wires tapped’ in Trump Tower just before the victory. Nothing found. This is McCarthyism!”

He followed up that initial tweet with a string of others in the following 30 minutes that claimed Obama had defied a court rejection to tap his office, and invited a “good lawyer” to make a case against the alleged process.




The president then compared the alleged surveillance of his communications to Watergate – the scandal in the early 1970s that brought down Republican president Richard Nixon after he ordered a break-in of the Democrats’ Washington headquarters.

Obama Nixon

Lock this Seditious Bastard up!

It now appears that Obama, Hillary Clinton, the FBI, the CIA, the DOJ, and the NSA were all a much greater threat to this past election than the Russians.

What this “scandal-free” Obama administration did before leaving… to try to set in place within our federal government, an apparatus to take down the incoming President & his administration, has the potential to be one of the greatest scandals in American History. This is NOT hyperbole. ~ Mark Levin

 

President Trump Signs Bills Targeted At Recruiting More Women In STEM Careers

 Political  Comments Off on President Trump Signs Bills Targeted At Recruiting More Women In STEM Careers
Mar 032017
 
President Trump signed two executive orders aimed at recruiting more women in the fields of Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math.
President Trump Signs Bills Targeted At Recruiting More Women In STEM Careers

Photo Credit: Zach Gibson

February 2017 ended on a positive note, as President Trump used his power as President to sign two bills which are designed to recruit more women into science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) jobs. At the Oval Office, Trump mentioned that it is unfair that only 1 in 4 women with a degree in one of these areas works in the field.

The first bill, HR321, authorizes NASA to actively ramp up its attempts to recruit and encourage more young women into going into STEM careers. It also requires the space organization to report to Congress on its plans for achieving the goals outlined in the legislation.

Bill HR 255 authorizes the National Science Foundation (NSF), the source of nearly one-fourth of all federally supported scientific research, to boost its recruitment efforts. Females who graduate in STEM subjects will be assisted in taking up STEM careers, particularly in the worlds of both academia and industry.

Though some fine details of the bills are somewhat lacking, both received bipartisan support in Congress, reports the Chicago Tribune.

As IFLScience points out, in 2012, a US census discovered that just 25% of men and women with a bachelor’s in a STEM subject find work in a STEM field. The main issue seems to be the lack of funding and career support for science-based fields.

Though most of the Executive orders signed by President Trump have outraged die-hard Obama and Hillary Clinton loyalists across the U.S., this latest move is being applauded by nearly everyone.

Empowered Women - Ivanka Trump

 
Source…

Study: Mainstream Media Coverage Of Trump’s First Month 88 Percent “Hostile”

 Political  Comments Off on Study: Mainstream Media Coverage Of Trump’s First Month 88 Percent “Hostile”
Mar 032017
 
A “Meticulous” study conducted by the Media Research Center found that 88% of broadcast news coverage on President Trump and his administration was “Hostile” during his first 30 days in office.

Study Mainstream Media Coverage Of Trump’s First Month 88 Percent “Hostile”

The antagonism between Trump and the “Mainstream Media” is no secret, with Trump recently calling corporate-owned news media the “Enemy of the American People.” Now a new study, conducted by the Media Research Center (MRC), has confirmed that the media’s coverage of Trump has been anything but balanced, with 88% of all news coverage of the administration within its first 30 days in office found to be overtly “hostile.” The study analyzed evening newscasts on the “Big Three” networks – ABC, NBC, and CBS – for both tone and content during Trump’s first month in the White House. They found that the three networks had collectively produced around 16 hours of coverage on Trump and his administration, representing 54% of their total coverage for the entire month.

“Our measure of media tone excludes sound-bites from identified partisans, focusing instead on tallying the evaluative statements made by reporters and the nonpartisan talking heads (experts and average citizens) included in their stories,” wrote Rich Noyes – research director for the MRC – along with fellow MRC analyst Mike Ciandella. “Our measure of media tone excludes sound-bites from identified partisans, focusing instead on tallying the evaluative statements made by reporters and the nonpartisan talking heads (experts and average citizens) included in their stories,” the pair added.

Trump bad press 30 days

Despite the study’s focus on allegedly nonpartisan journalists and experts, the networks were found to have filled their stories with quotes largely from citizens angry about Trump’s policies, giving minimal airtime to Trump supporters. It was also found that reporters “often injected their own anti-Trump editorial tone into the coverage. ‘It has been a busy day for presidential statements divorced from reality,’ CBS Evening News anchor Scott Pelley […] began his February 6 broadcast.”

The study also noted that Trump’s so-called “Muslim ban” drew the most negative coverage, netting over three hours in total, though the border wall issue was a close second. The study also reported that “nearly an hour of coverage (56 minutes) was given over to anti-Trump protests on various topics, with nearly one-fifth (82 out of 442) of the Trump stories or briefs aired during these 30 days including at least some discussion of an anti-Trump protest.”

A previous MRC study had found that negative coverage of his campaign was similarly high with 91% of broadcast coverage at the time found to cast the Trump campaign in a negative light. With trust in the media at an all-time low and with a majority of Americans believing that the media is too critical of Trump, this latest study only confirms that the mainstream media remains remarkably out of touch with the average American.

 
By Whitney Webb

 Older Entries  Newer Entries