Harvard Study Reveals Huge Anti-Trump Media Bias

 Political  Comments Off on Harvard Study Reveals Huge Anti-Trump Media Bias
May 192017
 

Harvard Study Proves Trump Was Right About Negative Media Coverage

Harvard Study Reveals Huge Anti-Trump Media Bias

The Mainstream Media isn’t even pretending to be objective anymore. Fox news at 52% negative and 48% positive… sounds almost balanced in their reporting. They still lean negative though.

From Heat Street:

A major new study out of Harvard University has revealed the true extent of the mainstream media’s bias against Donald Trump.

Academics at the Shorenstein Center on Media, Politics and Public Policy analyzed coverage from Trump’s first 100 days in office across 10 major TV and print outlets.

It found that the tone of some outlets was negative in as many as 98% of reports, significantly more hostile than the first 100 days of the three previous administrations:

Harvard Study Reveals Huge Anti-Trump Media Bias

In America they analyzed CNN, NBC, CBS, Fox News, the New York Times, the Washington Post and the Wall Street Journal.

They also took into account the BBC, the UK’s Financial Times and the German public broadcaster ARD.

Every outlet was negative more often than positive.

Only Fox News, which features some of Trump’s most enthusiastic supporters and is often given special access to the President, even came close to positivity.

Fox was ranked 52% negative and 48% positive.

The study also divided news items across topics. On immigration, healthcare, and Russia, more than 85% of reports were negative.

On the economy, the proportion was more balanced – 54% negative to 46% positive:

The study highlighted one exception: Trump got overwhelmingly positive coverage for launching a cruise missile attack on Syria.

Around 80% of all reports were positive about that.

The picture was very different for other recent administrations. The study found that President Obama’s first 100 got positive good overall – with 59% of reports positive.

Bill Cinton and George W Bush got overall negative coverage, it found, but to a much lesser extent than Trump. Clinton’s first 100 days got 40% positivity, while Bush’s got 43%:

Trump has repeatedly claimed that his treatment by the media is unprecedented in its hostility. This study suggests that, at least in recent history, he’s right.

 
 

HRC Camp Plotted To Smear Trump For A Putin “Bromance” Way Back In 2015

 Political  Comments Off on HRC Camp Plotted To Smear Trump For A Putin “Bromance” Way Back In 2015
May 172017
 

Is this the SMOKING GUN in the Trump Russia Fake News narrative?

HRC Camp Plotted To Smear Trump For A Putin Bromance Way Back In 2015

A Wikileaks email shows that Hillary Clinton’s campaign team was advised to link Russian President Vladimir Putin with Donald Trump in an apparent bid to distract voters from her strategy on ISIS.

The exchange of emails between Clinton campaign chair John Podesta and Clinton ally and columnist Brent Budowsky was among the batch of around 1,000 emails from Podesta’s account released by WikiLeaks on October 22, 2016.

In a December 21, 2015 email, Budowsky criticizes Clinton’s position on fighting ISIS before advising Podesta to draw Putin into her attacks on Donald Trump.

Wikileaks Email ID 25621 Brent Budowsky advises Podesta – to smear Trump with a Putin “Bromance”:

Russia Setup

Budowsky’s email follows a discussion with Podesta on how to best position the former secretary of state on the issue of tackling ISIS.

Budowsky warns that Clinton is not coming down strongly enough on fighting ISIS and that her support for Obama’s approach is a potential “death ray to her candidacy in a general election.”

“Walk back and escape from her statement that ‘finally we are where we need to be’ against ISIS. We are not where we need to be, we are far from it, most voters do not believe it, and when the next terror attack comes in America – which it certainly will – she will be branded in hot iron with that statement,” Budowski warns.

“She will never state what I believe we need to do – at least 20,000 ground troops with 3,000 American and at least 10,000 from Sunni Muslim nations – because she is consumed with keeping Obama’s goodwill and afraid of liberal backlash.”

Podesta counters: “Her reference was not to ISIS but to going after Assad diplomatically because of UNSC resolution passed Friday. We will make that clear. She has given two major speeches about how we are NOT where we need to be on ISIS.”

“That’s good, sooner it’s clarified the better, and the stronger the better,” Budowski replies, later adding: “Best approach is to slaughter Donald for his bromance with Putin, but not go too far betting on Putin re Syria.”

 
 

Hillary Clinton Gave The Russians 20 Percent Of The U.S.’ Uranium Supply

 Political  Comments Off on Hillary Clinton Gave The Russians 20 Percent Of The U.S.’ Uranium Supply
May 162017
 

Hillary Clinton approved the transfer of 20 percent of U.S. uranium to Russia and nine investors in the deal funneled $145 million to the Clinton Foundation.

Hillary Clinton Gave The Russians 20 Percent Of The U.S.’ Uranium Supply

While Hillary Clinton’s State Department was one of eight agencies to review and sign off on the transfer of 20 percent of U.S. uranium to Russia — then-Secretary of State Clinton herself was the only agency head whose family foundation received $145 million in donations from multiple people connected to the uranium deal, as reported by the New York Times.

The reason that the Mainstream Media and the Washington Elite continue the false narrative of Trump colluding with the Russians is to distract from the Clinton’s dealings with the Russians, Bill’s speaking fees and Hillary’s uranium deal. That is the real Russian scandal and has been from the beginning.

Donations to the Clinton Foundation, and a Russian Uranium Takeover

Uranium investors’ efforts to buy mining assets in Kazakhstan and the United States led to a takeover bid by a Russian state-owned energy company. The investors gave millions to the Clinton Foundation over the same period, while Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton’s office was involved with approving the Russian bid.

Real News as reported by the New York Times
Cash Flowed to Clinton Foundation Amid Russian Uranium Deal

 

 

 

 

The Party Of Projection

 Political  Comments Off on The Party Of Projection
May 152017
 

The Party Of Projection

Isn’t it interesting how the very things Democrats accuse President Trump of are what define them:
  • Mentally Unstable (Trump Derangement Syndrome)
  • Collusion (DNC + Hillary Clinton + Mainstream Media)
  • Inciting Violence (ANTIFA, DNC, George Soros, Obama and Hillary Clinton hired agitators)
  • Overstepping Authority (Obama)
  • Lying (their default on seemingly everything)

 
 

Potential Conflicts In Top FBI Official’s Role In Russia Collusion Probe

 Political  Comments Off on Potential Conflicts In Top FBI Official’s Role In Russia Collusion Probe
May 132017
 

Is this why James Comey was really fired?

Potential Conflicts In Top FBI Official’s Role In Russia Collusion Probe

This PDF from Senator Grassley’s website is a must read but the last 4 pages are GOLD. If anyone questions you on the timing of Comey’s firing send them this.

McCabe is NEXT!

An additional bombshell here – as of Match 28 2017 the Clinton Foundation is still under investigation!

A snippet:

Mr. McCabe is already under investigation by the Department of Justice Office of Inspector General for failing to recuse himself from the Clinton investigation due to his meeting with McAuliffe. After that meeting, McAuliffe-aligned political groups donated about $700,000 to Mr. McCabe’s wife, Dr. McCabe, for her campaign to become a Democrat state Senator in Virginia.

This is alarming. McCabe gets away with this without any questions from the media regarding ethics.

You won’t find anything that is informative in the Mainstream Media. That’s a given at this point. If it’s being trumpeted in the Mainstream Media, you can automatically assume one of two things.

  1. It’s a bold faced lie for some agenda
  2. Whatever is being touted has been cherry picked from a barrel of other related facts and spun to benefit the elite somehow.

If the Mainstream Media is not talking about any given subject, and you see a lot of rumblings about it online, you can almost guarantee it’s probably true and/or important… It’s a sad state of affairs, not that this should be a shock to anyone in the know.

Archived link.
[pdf-embedder url=”https://commonsenseevaluation.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/2017-05-02-CEG-to-DOJ-McCabe-Continuing-Conflicts.pdf” title=”2017-05-02 CEG to DOJ (McCabe Continuing Conflicts)”]

 
 
h/t reddit

 Older Entries  Newer Entries