Under The Cover Of Darkness: The Democratic Congress Removes The Secure Fence Act

 Amusing  Comments Off on Under The Cover Of Darkness: The Democratic Congress Removes The Secure Fence Act
Dec 232007
 

Under The Cover Of Darkness: The Democratic Congress Removes The Secure Fence Act

The Liberal elites in Washington have repeatedly shown their disdain for the wishes of the American people. The only explanation is that they are all totally corrupt. Next year, 2008 promises to see a number of incumbents seeking new employment, and this is just the beginning. When our leaders can’t agree that English is the official language of the USA you can tell they just do not live on the same plane of existence that the common working man does.

It is time to close the door on them. Perhaps they’d all find Mexico more to their liking.

Secure Fence Act of 2006

Congressional Democrats, and some Republicans, gut the Secure Fence Act in the omnibus spending bill against the wishes of the American people. In a bill with 9,000 earmarks, border security takes a back seat.

The Secure Fence Act of 2006 required the construction of 700 miles of border fence, modeled on the success of the border barriers in the San Diego sector of the U.S. border. The operative word is “secure.”

That legislation specifically called for “two layers of reinforced fencing” and listed five specific sections of the border where it should be built. The omnibus spending bill removes the requirement for two tiers and the specific list of locations.

The two-tier fence in San Diego runs 14 miles along the border with Tijuana, Mexico. The first layer is a high steel fence, with an inner high anti-climb fence with a no-man’s land in between.

It has been amazingly effective. According to a 2005 report by the Congressional Research Service, illegal alien apprehensions in the San Diego sector dropped from 202,000 in 1992 to 9,000 in 2004.

As local congressman and presidential candidate Duncan Hunter notes, “The success of the San Diego Border Fence demonstrates the overall effectiveness of the double-layered approach and the importance of extending this infrastructure across the southern land border.”

It is that very success, we suspect, that frightens the open-border crowd and their representatives in Congress. How else to explain that, as the citizen watchdog group Grassfire (grassfire.org) notes, just five miles of fence that meets specifications has been built in the first year after the Secure Fence Act was passed.

The spending bill was written by Democrats and passed 253-154 with mostly their votes. Democrats say they weren’t deliberately dropping the two-tiered fence or the locations specified. They say they were merely adopting language that passed the Senate several times this year.

Indeed, in the Senate version is a curious amendment by Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchinson, R-Texas, that was added on a voice vote. Her amendment reads:

“Nothing in this paragraph shall require the secretary of Homeland Security to install fencing, physical barriers, roads lighting, cameras and sensors in a particular location along an international border of the United States, if the secretary determines that the use or placement of such resources is not the appropriate means to achieve and maintain operational control over the international border at such location.”

Hutchinson’s office says the amendment merely gives DHS flexibility. What it provides, however, is an excuse to do nothing at all and a license for open-border politicians to pressure DHS.

DHS is on record as preferring in many instances “pedestrian fences” or “virtual fences” that are essentially a look-but-can’t-touch version of border security.

“By eliminating the double-fence requirement, the Democratic Congress is going to make it easier for drug and human smugglers to cross our southern land border,” said Hunter.

“This goes against the interests of any family that has been touched by illegal drugs or any American who has seen their job taken by an illegal alien.”

Congress has also made it easier for terrorists to sneak their operatives into the U.S.

This is in a nation that won two world wars and put men on the moon. The border fence would have been farther along if we’d just given the Minutemen a federal grant in the form of a gift certificate to Home Depot. (NYSE:HD)

So the next time you hear candidates for any office say they support border security, give them a post-hole digger and point them toward Mexico.

The Jingle Cats Perform White Christmas

 Amusing  Comments Off on The Jingle Cats Perform White Christmas
Dec 222007
 

And now for your viewing pleasure… This weekend’s entertainment The Jingle Cats.

This is quite possibly the most terrifying music video ever made.

Free Jessica Simpson Mask for Panthers Game Saturday

 Amusing  Comments Off on Free Jessica Simpson Mask for Panthers Game Saturday
Dec 212007
 

Being a Philadelphia Eagles fan, I truly hate the Dallas Cowboys so when I saw this, I put my support behind it.

Milwaukeeworld is offering a free Jessica Simpson cutout mask, for Carolina Panther and Green Bay Packer fans. This Saturday, the 12-2 Dallas Cowboys travel to the Bank of America stadium in Charlotte, N.C. to take on the 6-8 Carolina Panthers. The game will be televised on the NFL Network at 8 p.m. (EST).

DO-IT-YOURSELF JESSICA SIMPSON MASK


Twenty-first century siren Jessica Simpson threw Tony Romo’s game into turmoil last week because her boyfriend just can’t keep her off his mind. Even Romo’s teammate Terrell Owens said the pulchritudinous blonde should keep her distance so the man from Burlington, Wisconsin can win this game for the Dallas Cowboys.
Those of us who remain true to the Green and Gold feel it would not be fair for the young Rom(e)o to be deprived of the beauty of his inamorata, so milwaukeeworld offers you this do-it-yourself Jessica Simpson cutout mask. Make sure your friends in Ol’ Carolina print these beauties out and wear them to the game at Bank of America Stadium in Charlotte on Saturday at 8 p.m. (EST). You’ll help preserve the Panthers’ playoff chances, and you’ll guarantee home-field advantage for the Pack on the road to the Superbowl. Click on the link below for your very own Jessica mask!


If Someone Triple-Dog Dares You To Stick Your Tongue To A Frozen Metal Pole — Don’t

 Amusing  Comments Off on If Someone Triple-Dog Dares You To Stick Your Tongue To A Frozen Metal Pole — Don’t
Dec 202007
 

Anyone who has ever seen the movie “A Christmas Story” knows that there are two important life lessons in it.

1. Don’t stick your tongue to a frozen pole.

2. BB guns are dangerous.

“Are you kidding? Stick my tongue to that stupid pole? That’s dumb!”


Will Your Tongue Really Stick to a Frozen Flagpole?


The next time someone triple-dog dares you to stick your tongue to a frozen metal pole — don’t. Your tongue will be joined to the pole, and you’ll have plenty of time to ponder the thermal conductivity of metal while you await the rescue squad.

Your tongue is covered with moisture, which beings to freeze if its temperature drops below 32 degrees Fahrenheit. Your body counteracts the freezing by pumping warm blood to your tongue.

Heat from your blood warms the moisture through a process called conduction. Heat energy from the blood excites atoms in your tongue. The atoms absorb energy and vibrate. The more they vibrate, the more their temperatures increase. This incites vibrations in neighboring atoms, which take the energy and pass it up the line like a hot potato and eventually warms the surface moisture.

So why is the Fire Department on its way?

“It’s because of the high thermal conductivity of the pole,” explains Frank J. DiSalvo, director of the Cornell Center for a Sustainable Future and co-director of the Cornell Fuel Cell Institute. “The metal is a much better conductor than your tongue (up to 400 times more powerful). The metal takes heat faster than your body can replenish it.”

The atoms in solid metals are packed tightly and transfer thermal energy more readily. They also have free electrons that boost conductivity. Free electrons are free to move from atom to atom. The electrons absorb heat energy and move through the flagpole, stirring up other atoms.

As your tongue touches the flagpole, the moisture on your tongue is robbed of heat. The temperature of the moisture drops. Water freezes inside tiny pores and surface irregularities on your tongue and the pole. You’re stuck.

So now your thinking, “Maybe if I just pull hard it will come off.” Yes, it will — a piece of your tongue, that is.

Kent Sperry is a 911 dispatcher at a place where people know about cold and snow — Boulder, Colorado. He offers a less painful alternative, assuming you happen to have the necessary remedy at hand: “Pour warm water on the area where the tongue meets the pole, and the tongue should come free.”


Windows Vista Has Fewer Flaws Than Mac OS X

 Amusing  Comments Off on Windows Vista Has Fewer Flaws Than Mac OS X
Dec 192007
 

All of those smug Mac lovers who point to Windows vulnerabilities now have something to worry about. A top security researcher claims that Windows Vista is more secure than Mac OS X.

In my opinion, one reason Apple has such a shiny reputation has nothing to do with its platform, and everything to do with its masterful marketing.

Mac versus Windows vulnerability stats for 2007


So this shows that Apple had more than 5 times the number of flaws per month than Windows XP and Vista in 2007, and most of these flaws are serious. Clearly this goes against conventional wisdom because the numbers show just the opposite and it isn’t even close.

Also noteworthy is that while Windows Vista shows fewer flaws than Windows XP and has more mitigating factors against exploitation, the addition of Windows Defender and Sidebar added 4 highly critical flaws to Vista that weren’t present in Windows XP. Sidebar accounted for three of those additional vulnerabilities and it’s something I am glad I don’t use. The lone Defender critical vulnerability that was supposed to defend Windows Vista was ironically the first critical vulnerability for Windows Vista.