Photo Shows Putin in Disguise During Reagan Visit

 Amusing  Comments Off on Photo Shows Putin in Disguise During Reagan Visit
Mar 202009
 


I have my doubts that is Putin in disguise. For one thing the guy is taller than the 10 year old boy.

A picture has emerged apparently showing Russia’s Prime Minister Vladimir Putin in his former days as a KGB officer.

The 20-year old photo depicts two world leaders – US President Ronald Reagan and the Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev – in Moscow.
But, according to the man who took the photo, it also captures Mr Putin disguised as a tourist.

Pete Souza, now President Obama’s official photographer, captured the moment when he worked for President Reagan during the political thaw that soon ended the Cold War.
Mr Reagan took a stroll around Red Square accompanied by the Russian leader, who then introduced him to a group of tourists.

In an interview, Mr Souza recounted being surprised at the “pointed” questions these supposed tourists asked the US leader.

They included searching enquiries on the state of human rights in the US.
The identity of the man on the left of the photo – complete with camera round his neck – was later revealed and “verified” to Mr Souza as none other than Mr Putin.
The planting of KGB officers as bystanders was a common practice in Soviet times.
During the tense stand-off of the Cold War, they would be used to challenge foreign leaders during visits to Russia.

But, while acknowledging this practice, a Russian political analyst and author of books on Vladimir Putin dismissed Mr Souza’s claims as “nonsense”.

“Vladimir Putin was a major serving in Dresden and he wasn’t important enough at that time to be brought to Moscow”, said Andrey Piontkovsky.

Mr Putin served as a KGB officer in the East German city of Dresden.
He was stationed there from 1985 until the fall of the Berlin Wall. He was later called back to Russia.

Not a huge amount is known about his work there, but it is widely believed he was a middle-ranking agent on his first and only foreign posting.

Source…

The Economy: Bailouts and Bull with John Stossel

 Amusing  Comments Off on The Economy: Bailouts and Bull with John Stossel
Mar 192009
 

John Stossel is one of the few reporters who are not afraid to tell the truth. In this clip he explains that the current recession is being made worse, by the Democrats in Washington. They’re telling Americans that things are desperate, and that the only solution is more Government. The reality is that the Economy isn’t as bad as they claim, and if left alone, would run it’s course and start recovering much sooner than it would by throwing more money into failing companies.


John Stossel discusses how government spends/waste taxpayer money and the consequence of intervention in the economy.

The Bernie Madoffs in Congress

 Amusing  Comments Off on The Bernie Madoffs in Congress
Mar 192009
 

This can all be solved with two words… Term Limits!

Throw the bums out!

Everyone hates Bernie Madoff. He is the new face of what’s wrong in America. He has been called an evil monster, but, according to his victims, these words are inadequate.

You have to hand it to Madoff. He lived large – no, huge – off this Ponzi scheme. It was great while it lasted and no one, including Madoff, thought it would go on as long as it did.

While Madoff was considered a financial genus, his plan was surprisingly simple: Take money from investors. Give them an annual return that they could get no where else by taking money from new investors.

Of course, he kept the lion’s share for himself, socking it away in thousands of places, preferring to plead guilty to all charges, rather than cooperate and name any accomplices.

The government estimates that Madoff stole $65 billion from his clients. It has been called the biggest case of fraud in history. I beg to differ.

By my calculations there are some 465 Bernie Madoffs, who are operating a similar Ponzi scheme right under our very noses, stealing billions from hardworking Americans each and every year.

They take our money in the form of tax dollars and dole it out to their friends in the form of pork barrel projects called “earmarks,” who give it back to them in the form of campaign contributions and sweetheart business deals for themselves and members of their families. While a few – very few – members have been prosecuted, most of what they do is legal, though unethical, and they operate with impunity.

Last year, the watchdog group Taxpayers for Common Sense compiled data that showed that 60 percent of the members of the House Armed Services Committee who arranged earmarks also received campaign contributions from the companies that received the funding. Almost all the members of the committee received campaign contributions from companies that got earmarks this year.

We look at Madoff, and we point a finger at federal regulators and say, “Why didn’t somebody do something?” What about the 200 million eligible U.S. voters who have oversight of Congress or, at the very least, the 90 million who pay taxes? Why don’t we do something? After all, we are the victims of this Ponzi scheme.

A large chunk of this money is recycled and doled back to the states, which is supposed to make us feel better about it. In fact, most Madoffs in Congress brag about this practice and use it as a tool to get re-elected. Take the money from taxpayers. Launder it through layers of bureaucracy and give 50 cents on the dollar back to the states for projects the majority of people there don’t need or want.

How much better it would be to cut federal taxes, leave the money in the states and let the people who live there make the hard decisions on how to spend it! But, no! That doesn’t increase the power of our representatives in Washington!

Obama promised to get rid of earmarks but he just signed a $410 billion omnibus bill outside of the glare of the cameras that contained 9,000 of them!

It’s important to identify the Madoffs who passed this bill. In the Senate, it includes all Democrats with the exception of Bayh, McCaskill and Feingold. It also includes Republicans Shelby, Murkowski, Snowe, Cochran, Wicker, Bond, Specter and Alexander.

In the House, the Madoffs include all Democrats with the exception of these 20: Bean, Cardoza, Costa, Speier, Childers, Cooper, Tanner, Donnelly, Hill, Driehaus, Giffords, Mitchell, Kind, Kratovil, Marshall, Matheson, Minnick, Nye, Peterson and Taylor.

The Madoff Republicans are: Bono, Mack, Brown-Waite, Cao, Capito, Castle, Dent, Gerlach, Murphy, Emerson, LoBiondo, McHugh, Miller, Upton, Reichert, Whitfield and Young.

However, these are not the only Madoff Republicans in the House. Despite their “no” votes, all but 39 Republicans had earmarks in this bloated omnibus bill.

In all, only six senators and 64 House members have signed the “no earmark” pledge. Check it out at http://earmarkpledge.com/signers.php. The rest clearly are Madoffs, and they should be dumped in the next election.

They all have excuses – some worthwhile project their state just couldn’t be without. Don’t buy it!

There are those who will argue that earmarks are only a small part of the problem in Washington. This is true. However, when you clean out something, you start with the part that smells.

Source…

 Older Entries  Newer Entries