Amusing

What Do William Shatner, Gun Control and Barack Obama Have In Common?

William Shatner – How Gun Control Works

In this video the man most famous for playing Captain Kirk on Star Trek, and who starred as Denny Crane on ABC’s Boston Legal, offers a view on gun control not normally seen on television.

Cool, calm, collected and right on target. This is how you do it. Priceless!

 

 

You May Like This --

13 thoughts on “What Do William Shatner, Gun Control and Barack Obama Have In Common?”

  4. Thank you for all that Bill and Founders.

    By George I think I’ve finally got it. So You give the bad guys your watch wallet and chit chat first. Because none of that individually or combined ever neutralizes and dispatches the bad guys and criminal women from going on to the next one to do more of the same acts of violence terrorism theft and racketeering.

  6. If you have to draw your weapon and fire to save your own life, you always shoot to kill; always. What, you don’t think if merely wounded in the foot the criminal won’t shoot back? Since you should not even be using your firearm unless you are in imminent danger of death or serious bodily harm, the only response to that is deadly force by you… Period!

  7. I have never seen that commercial before and that was absolutely awesome.
    William “Capt. Kirk” Shatner can’t be F’d with. LOL!!!!

  10. one problem,shatner is not white,he is jewish.and jews do not like to get robbed,they like to do the robbing,LOL

  11. Love that! What a great scene. William Shatner is the man. F Hollywood. F the Democrats. F Soros. Yes, to freedom! Yes, to self defense.

  13. Find one government in the history of humanity that felt a need to document a “RIGHT” for it’s ARMED FORCES to possess ARMS.
    Oppressive Governments are ALWAYS banning the People’S RIGHTS to arms.
    The claim that the Founding Fathers wrote the 2nd Amendment to give Our ARMED FORCES a “right” to keep and carry ARMS is S-T-U-P-I-D.
    The only reason for the Second Amendment is to clearly spell-out the GOD GIVEN RIGHT of INDIVIDUALS to keep & bear ARMS.
    The only reason for the BILL(list) of RIGHTS was to codify INDIVIDUALS’ GOD GIVEN RIGHTS.
    Has there ever been a government that was not chock full of it’s “rights” up to and including declaring itself to be the Lord God Almighty?! (Rome, Egypt, Israel,etc)
    Does the 1st Amendment mean the GOVERNMENT is allowed to give speeches? Try shutting up any Politician. But THEY would LOVE to shut YOU up, hence the FIRST Amendment.
    Anyone who tells you the 2nd Amendment applies to the Army or State Militia, is telling you they think you are STUPID.
    There has NEVER been a government that felt it had to codify it’s army’s/soldier’s “RIGHT” to “Keep and BEAR ARMS” because there has NEVER been a government that refused to allow It’s own soldiers to KEEP and BEAR ARMS!
    The Second Amendment was given to the People, like all the other rights in the Bill or Rights. This was confirmed by the SCOTUS in the DC vs Heller decision, where they stated that the “People” in the Second Amendment were the same “People” that are mentioned in the First and Fourth Amendment.
    The 2nd Amendment clearly guarantees the “right of the PEOPLE to keep and bear arms”, and certainly not “the Militia”.
    Why would “the Militia”, a type of army manned by citizen-soldiers as opposed to full-time “regulars”, need a constitutional amendment to guarantee they have the right “to keep and bear arms”?
    Is there any specific statement anywhere in the Constitution that the army Congress is empowered to raise has the “right to keep and bear arms”?

    Of course not. …………. That is assumed.
    “The beauty of the Second Amendment is that it will not be needed until they try to take it.” — Thomas Jefferson

    It is implicit in the nature of all kinds of armies —- be they militia or regulars, volunteer, conscripted, or mercenary — to be armed.
    They are all “armed forces”.
    They all “bear arms”.
    They all carry guns.
    That is what they do.
    It certainly no more requires an amendment to the Constitution to state that “the Militia” has the RKBA , than a specific statement that the army Congress is empowered to raise may be manned by armed troops.

Comments are closed.